White House: Obamas earn $5.5 million in 2009

read the OP...i posted it to get evince's take on it...i could care less what he made...you just enjoy lying about others because you can't actually engage in rational debate

you're just a bitter little man who enjoys nothing more than insulting others on the internet....ged, kkk, racist....

got it, that is the extent of your intellect

your next substanstive post will be your first:321:
 
Go back and read that thread, I said it was fine she made the money.

I just pointed out that she left her gov gig for money, her choice and its not problem except for the fools who think she will be president.

no, you were whining about her making money from speeches and books
 
no, you were whining about her making money from speeches and books

This isn't even meant as an insult, but you really do have some reading comprehension issues. She said a few times on that thread that she didn't have any problem whatsoever w/ her making the money. She was just talking about how it related to her political ambitions & other issues surrounding that.

You're wrong.
 
This isn't even meant as an insult, but you really do have some reading comprehension issues. She said a few times on that thread that she didn't have any problem whatsoever w/ her making the money. She was just talking about how it related to her political ambitions & other issues surrounding that.

You're wrong.

He's often wrong. Even so, YurTroll will demand an apology (?) soon, as usual.
 
This isn't even meant as an insult, but you really do have some reading comprehension issues. She said a few times on that thread that she didn't have any problem whatsoever w/ her making the money. She was just talking about how it related to her political ambitions & other issues surrounding that.

You're wrong.

not to insult your intelligence...but

They will never admitt she is obviously using them to make a pantload of cash.

The Governor gig money was looking pretty pale compared to what book sales and speaking fees she saw others getting.

She didnt have to learn anything new and could just keep doing what she always been doing.

who cares if palin quit and wrote books and made money from that and speeches...she is whining about it, yet doesn't have a problem with obama making money from it...how was obama not "using" people who bought his books?

its disingenuous and really a petty thing to even remark on, palin can be knocked for much worse than making money writing books and giving speeches
 
not to insult your intelligence...but



who cares if palin quit and wrote books and made money from that and speeches...she is whining about it, yet doesn't have a problem with obama making money from it...how was obama not "using" people who bought his books?

its disingenuous and really a petty thing to even remark on, palin can be knocked for much worse than making money writing books and giving speeches

The words you posted don't mean what you are saying they mean; your whole OP - to call out Desh for 'hypocrisy' - is bogus. Beyond that, you clearly ignore on the other thread where she is very clear that she has NO problem at all w/ Palin making the money.

It's a reading thing.
 
The words you posted don't mean what you are saying they mean; your whole OP - to call out Desh for 'hypocrisy' - is bogus. Beyond that, you clearly ignore on the other thread where she is very clear that she has NO problem at all w/ Palin making the money.

It's a reading thing.

really...then what is she saying, and where are her posts saying different? i am willing to bet she was called on what she said and then changed her tune...

you seem incapable of actually explaining your position, i explained mine, why is it you can't explain yours. all you have is: you're wrong yurt, cause i say so....

:rolleyes:
 
really...then what is she saying, and where are her posts saying different? i am willing to bet she was called on what she said and then changed her tune...

you seem incapable of actually explaining your position, i explained mine, why is it you can't explain yours. all you have is: you're wrong yurt, cause i say so....

:rolleyes:

That's silly. What do I have to post? There is nothing in Desh's post that says "I begrudge this woman her money" in any shape or form. I realize that's how YOU intepret it, but this represents nothing more than a continuing pattern of misrepresenting the words of others. It has nothing to do with the actual words themselves.

And Desh was very clear on the other thread that she doesn't begrudge Palin the money, if you want to go back & read it. You generally ignore that stuff, because it flies in the face of what you so badly want the words to mean.
 
That's silly. What do I have to post? There is nothing in Desh's post that says "I begrudge this woman her money" in any shape or form. I realize that's how YOU intepret it, but this represents nothing more than a continuing pattern of misrepresenting the words of others. It has nothing to do with the actual words themselves.

And Desh was very clear on the other thread that she doesn't begrudge Palin the money, if you want to go back & read it. You generally ignore that stuff, because it flies in the face of what you so badly want the words to mean.

actually, more than just myself 'interpreted' her comments that way

i've now read more of the thread and see where she had to explain what she was saying....either she can't adequately express thoughts to written word or she got busted and had to recant...

i know you were hoping for a true gotcha this time, sorry to disappoint you.

yawn
 
actually, more than just myself 'interpreted' her comments that way

i've now read more of the thread and see where she had to explain what she was saying....either she can't adequately express thoughts to written word or she got busted and had to recant...

i know you were hoping for a true gotcha this time, sorry to disappoint you.

yawn

That's extraordinarily ironic, since this entire thread was started as a big "gotcha" on Desh, when in fact, she made no implication like the one you are asserting.

It's embarassing. You are always frantically searching for hypocrisy where none exists. There is plenty of hypocrisy in the world & in politics without you having to constantly twist words & misrepresent what others are saying to fabricate it.

Again - I know this is difficult.
 
That's extraordinarily ironic, since this entire thread was started as a big "gotcha" on Desh, when in fact, she made no implication like the one you are asserting.

It's embarassing. You are always frantically searching for hypocrisy where none exists. There is plenty of hypocrisy in the world & in politics without you having to constantly twist words & misrepresent what others are saying to fabricate it.

Again - I know this is difficult.

nice deflection onceler

the only difficulty here is your intellectual capacity, not an insult, just the truth, i hope it doesn't offend you :clink:
 
My capacity is okey-dokey. I can read the words of others, and actually comprehend what they are trying to say, without looking to project what I want to believe they are saying onto those words.

I thought it was a fairly simple thing for most people.
 
Because that is like a bajillion more times than what the White House Janitor makes. The majority of their money should be seized immediately and spread among the REAL workers in the White House.


:good4u:

actually, I might READ a book written by the White House janitor....I bet he has a million interesting stories to tell.....
 
Back
Top