When they say, "traditional Biblical marriage," show them this.

signalmankenneth

Verified User
marriage-bible-tradition.jpg
 
Signalmankenneth gets his ass handed to him by Poet.......Sweeet....

and AssWipe ignored as usual......:good4u:
 
Signalmankenneth gets his ass handed to him by Poet.......Sweeet....

and AssWipe ignored as usual......:good4u:

You're so slow and stupid. He didn't post it as a testimonial. He posted it as ridicule, you moron. I was in agreement with him, not your stupid ass.
 

The New Testament, specifically 1 Corinthians chapter 7, says that if you are going to succumb to the flesh, then one man and one woman should be married...

It is more holy not to get married, but if you are going by Christians rather than Jews... It's a one man, one woman thing.

Interesting, tidbit here. It also says that the wife should not refuse the husband, but in the next sentence the same is said about the husband. The wife shouldn't say no to sex, but neither should the husband...

1 Corinthians 7
Concerning Married Life
1 Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. 3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. 5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
 
The New Testament, specifically 1 Corinthians chapter 7, says that if you are going to succumb to the flesh, then one man and one woman should be married...

It is more holy not to get married, but if you are going by Christians rather than Jews... It's a one man, one woman thing.

Interesting, tidbit here. It also says that the wife should not refuse the husband, but in the next sentence the same is said about the husband. The wife shouldn't say no to sex, but neither should the husband...

ah, but what about divorce?
 
You're so slow and stupid. He didn't post it as a testimonial. He posted it as ridicule, you moron. I was in agreement with him, not your stupid ass.

Are you really too stupid to understand his post....he was ridiculing "traditional marriage" by using the Bible as proof that marriage had various definitions then....

YOU call it "Old Testament BS". So anybody touting the edicts of the Bible as source material for marriage, should just take a crap.

Thats what Kennith was doing, you queer fool....using the Bible as a SOURCE to define marriages.....one man and one woman being one of eight kinds......


Nice tapdance though.....you shouldn't make a fool out of one of your own lefties.....even by accident...and then try to lie you way out of it showing even
more ignorance........fuckin' idiot....
 
Last edited:
Are you really too stupid to understand his post....he was ridiculing "traditional marriage" by using the Bible as proof that marriage had various definitions then....

YOU call it "Old Testament BS". So anybody touting the edicts of the Bible as source material for marriage, should just take a crap.

Thats what Kennith was doing, you queer fool....using the Bible as a SOURCE to define marriages.....one man and one woman being one of eight kinds......


Nice tapdance though.....you shouldn't make a fool out of one of your own lefties.....even by accident...and then try to lie you way out of it showing even
more ignorance........fuckin' idiot....

Did you even read his comment at the head of the post?

When they say, "traditional Biblical marriage," show them this.


It's clear to all of us except you that he was ridiculing the religious right.
 
Only if you claim that religion is the basis for the current restrictions on marriage in most states. *shrug*

Um... You were the one that said that the bible made a "good argument" for making a law, not me saying that current "restrictions" are based in anything at all. You make the assertion, expect people to "suggest" that the Constitution may get in your way.
 
Did you even read his comment at the head of the post?

When they say, "traditional Biblical marriage," show them this.


It's clear to all of us except you that he was ridiculing the religious right.

Whats clear is your lack of reading comprehension....

When the right talks about "Trad. Biblical marriage" they obviously mean 1 man and 1 woman ONLY.

Pinhead Kenneth wants to use his Biblical findings to counter that traditional meaning.....he is the one using the Bible to define his versions of marriage...

You might be able to pronounce the words in front of you, you just don't know what the fuck they mean together and in context....



And , just like Hershey Highway Poet claims, using the Bible as source material for marriage is bs....I agree....
 
Whats clear is your lack of reading comprehension....

When the right talks about "Trad. Biblical marriage" they obviously mean 1 man and 1 woman ONLY.

Pinhead Kenneth wants to use his Biblical findings to counter that traditional meaning.....he is the one using the Bible to define his versions of marriage...

You might be able to pronounce the words in front of you, you just don't know what the fuck they mean together and in context....



And , just like Hershey Highway Poet claims, using the Bible as source material for marriage is bs....I agree....

There you go again, talking about your mama. You are clearly the one that is lacking in reading comprehension. Everybody got "it", but you. LOL.
 
Back
Top