what he said vs what he is doing

Trump likes people who have made lots of money, especially in an entrepreneurial way. The Goldman Sachs hires make no sense. Linda McMahon and the Carl's Jr guy make total sense with who he is

the head of carl's jr is a poor pick for labor sec. he wants to replace people with robots.
 
" A billionaire could have been poor and then become rich. Wouldn't that be the ultimate example of a person who knows how to succeed from the lowest of circumstances? " c #19
Even if so, cupidity is not necessarily a guarantor of benevolent executive skills.

A brilliant photographer may be an inadequate brain surgeon.

A gifted financial investor may be a talentless arctic explorer.

etc.

If Trump is more comfortable surrounded by fellow* $billionaires, that's fine. But it's possible to have superficial appearance of diversity in a cabinet, without much ideological complexity. The pitfall to that is obvious; they're easily blind-sided.

* Do we know for a certitude Trump is a $Billionaire? He said "I'm really rich." I don't recall him setting an order of magnitude on it.
 
DQ, what would be your definition of being in the side of the working man? Is that working to increase the minimum wage? Is it working to increase jobs?

to date he has done neither. his appointment for labor sec. is opposed to the minimum wage. and his deal to save jobs at carrier saved 750 (not 1100) jobs at a cost to the state of 7 million dollars.
 
Fair and honest about what? A billionaire could have been poor and then become rich. Wouldn't that be the ultimate example of a person who knows how to succeed from the lowest of circumstances?

Yes, some could have but how many actually did? It smacks of crony capitalism, all these billionaires and Wall St. insiders.

OT, have you ever read Sherlock Holmes? There is a point to this question.
 
You're asking for career bureaucrats. Those are the exact type he said he wouldn't hire

When Obama ran in 2008 and even now, people snarked that he was just a community organizer with no government experience. Now the cons don't consider no experience a liability.
 
That's what's going to happen when we try to raise entry level jobs to $15/hr. The econony is changing and we have to change with it

According to an article I read on NR, the pending Labor Secretary is on record as supporting the $15 minimum wage.
 
#30
Necessity is subjective.
In the vast scheme of things, the phrase "have to" is not used that way.

AND !!

Sometimes you have to economize.
I spent years having roommates,

not apartment mates, roommates.

There was a payoff. I now live on an estate that's hundreds of acres inside the Adirondack Park, with the luxury of living alone. It's paradise.
"I think you can have it all.
You can't have it all at once." Oprah Winfrey
 
America's main division right now is people who see through Trump and have easily seen through him since his escalator ride, and people who inexplicably still do not.

actually, the main division right now is people who see through the two main parties lying and manipulations of their supporting sheeple, and those who inexplicably still do not.
 
the head of carl's jr is a poor pick for labor sec. he wants to replace people with robots.
already happening..McDonalds announced kiosk ordering in Europe -the USA is sure to follow.

20150524_mcd.jpg


it's bound to happen. Heck even most call center jobs ( me) are outsourced - mine isn't because I sell -I'm not customer service.
How do you stop this>>? Is what Trump is looking at.
 
"How do you stop this>>? Is what Trump is looking at." #34
If you say so.

Crony capitalism isn't bad enough? Now he's looking to obstruct progress? Block efficiency in our economy?
"Every Presidential campaign is an epidemic of economic illiteracy, but this year is a particularly egregious case when talking about the manufacturing [jobs] crisis. What that means is manufacturing employment as a percentage of total employment is declining. True. [It] Has been for 60 years. We make steel today, we made steel 20 years ago. We just make 1/3 more steel today with 2/3 fewer steel works who have gone on to other points of employment. If we have a crisis in manufacturing ... we have a calamity in agriculture, because in 1940 19% of our employers were in agriculture, 4% by 1970, 2% today. That's a triumph of American productivity, not a problem." George Will
 
If you say so.

Crony capitalism isn't bad enough? Now he's looking to obstruct progress? Block efficiency in our economy?
only you could come up with that misshapen idea. :)
Of course not. One cannot "stop" automation - the Labor Sec from carl's is an advocate of automation for food service jobs.

What you can do is raise the general GDP level ( raising wages) which spins off more labor jobs. And then prevent mindless outsourcing of those
Manufacturing jobs are superior to service jobs- get more of them to offset McDonalds jobs
 
Back
Top