What god did Einstein believe in?

[Monad Portal]

Promise?

no.

Or are you lying like a globalist cocksucker again?

faulty premise error. you are the weakest link.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

no.

faulty premise error. you are the weakest link.

Thanks for admitting you're a liar and a bullshitter, but you and I both knew that already as do most people.

Meh. We're all links in the chain of life and will all eventually be replaced. So it goes.

 

[Cypress]

how did you determine that random chance is the least likely explanation?!!

Basic mathematical probability and logic. Think man, think!

By the laws of physics and logic, something cannot come from nothing. No matters how many chances there are. You could roll a six sided die 500 trillion times and never get a 7.

By the laws of logic, the rational does not spontaneously pop out by chance from the irrational. The rational mathematical scaffolding of physical reality would not spontaneously pop into existence by random chance.

By the laws of probability and logic, fine tuning is statistically implausible. In principle, the geometry and the physical constants seem like they could have taken on any value. The perfect flatness of space; the perfect net zero balance of positive and negative energy; the fortuitous values of the universal constants to allow complex atomic matter, all point to a coincidence too massive to sweep under the rug and ignore.

 

[Monad Portal]

Thanks for admitting you're a liar and a bullshitter, but you and I both knew that already as do most people.

Meh. We're all links in the chain of life and will all eventually be replaced. So it goes.

you have mischaracterized what has happened here.

 

[Monad Portal]

Basic mathematical probability and logic. Think man, think!

By the laws of physics and logic, something cannot come from nothing. No matters how many chances there are. You could roll a six sided die 500 trillion times and never get a 7.

By the laws of logic, the rational does not spontaneously pop out by chance from the irrational. The rational mathematical scaffolding of physical reality would not spontaneously pop into existence by random chance.

By the laws of probability and logic, fine tuning is statistically implausible. In principle, the geometry and the physical constants seem like they could have taken on any value. The perfect flatness of space; the perfect net zero balance of positive and negative energy; the fortuitous values of the universal constants to allow complex atomic matter, all point to a coincidence too massive to sweep under the rug and ignore.

those are just descriptors we devised.

you have still not addressed what gave reality this consistency.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I'm a liar and a bullshitter who broke my own word within minutes of posting it.

FTFY, Freddy.

that's my final answer.

Promise? Or are you lying like a globalist cocksucker again?

no.

 

[Monad Portal]

FTFY, Freddy.

shut up, bitchy whore.

 

[Cypress]

those are just descriptors we devised.

For an atheist you don't think very well.

Math is a language of logic, and what we have found is that the universe surprisingly follows logical, rational, predictable patterns and principles

That is not what you would expect if your hypothesis is correct: that somehow a rational, predictable, lawfully organized universe just popped into existence by inanimate and irrational random chance.

You would expect a universe caused by random irrational chance to be inherently irrational, unlawful, unorganized, unintelligible.

You would expect a universe caused by random irrational chance to be irrational, unlawful, unorganized, unintelligibleyou have still not addressed what gave reality this consistency.

There's really only three choices

1) Something came from nothing by random chance and irrational inanimate causes.

2) The universe is infinitely old and it's design is random chance, therefore we don't have to explain an origin or cause.

3) Some external rational agency or force caused a rational and lawful universe.


Based on logic and physics the first two options are logically incoherent, though I could always be wrong. The last inference to the best explanation left standing is #3.

 

[Monad Portal]

For an atheist you don't think very well.

Math is a language of logic, and what we have found is that the universe surprisingly follows logical, rational, predictable patterns and principles

That is not what you would expect if your hypothesis is correct: that somehow a rational, predictable, lawfully organized universe just popped into existence by inanimate and irrational random chance.

You would expect a universe caused by random irrational chance to be inherently irrational, unlawful, unorganized, unintelligible.

There's really only three choices

1) Something came from nothing by random chance and irrational inanimate causes.

2) The universe is infinitely old and it's design is random chance, therefore we don't have to explain an origin or cause.

3) Some external rational agency or force caused a rational and lawful universe.


Based on logic and physics the first two options are logically incoherent, though I could always be wrong. The last inference to the best explanation left standing is #3.

matter and energy behaving consistently is just an innate characteritic, not something created.

you're just a fool.