'We’ll burn Jews like Hitler did’: Freelance journalist for BBC Arabic praises attacks on Jews: report

volsrocks

Verified User
Samer Elzaenen, who appeared on BBC Arabic multiple times since war began, shared posts promoting hatred, violence against Jews and support for terror; ..

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... A Gaza-based journalist who has appeared frequently on BBC Arabic since the beginning of the war expressed support for violence against Jews and praised terrorist attacks, the Telegraph reported on Saturday.




He’s a combatant not a journalist.

This is why I never shed a tear when I hear another “journalist” was killed in Gaza.
 
Samer Elzaenen, who appeared on BBC Arabic multiple times since war began, shared posts promoting hatred, violence against Jews and support for terror; ..

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... A Gaza-based journalist who has appeared frequently on BBC Arabic since the beginning of the war expressed support for violence against Jews and praised terrorist attacks, the Telegraph reported on Saturday.




He’s a combatant not a journalist.

This is why I never shed a tear when I hear another “journalist” was killed in Gaza.
Let be clear... You're not talking about all (true and neutral) journalists?
 
Samer Elzaenen, who appeared on BBC Arabic multiple times since war began, shared posts promoting hatred, violence against Jews and support for terror; ..
You didn't provide any information as to why you felt this post was somehow a good use of bandwidth. Many people make crazy posts on social media. Why single this one out?

When Elzaenen says that "We'll burn Jews", who does he mean by "we"? The BBC? England? Manchester United? Who?
 
You didn't provide any information as to why you felt this post was somehow a good use of bandwidth. Many people make crazy posts on social media. Why single this one out?

When Elzaenen says that "We'll burn Jews", who does he mean by "we"? The BBC? England? Manchester United? Who?
It’s entirely reasonable to spotlight this individual, given his repeated appearances on the BBC, a distinction few can claim. Say what you want, but that’s an elite circle. No one’s combing the depths of the internet for just any eccentric’s wild opinions, not in this case anyways. This is merely another symptom of the media’s descent into a quagmire of diminished standards. The BBC deliberately amplifies a provocateur whose views conveniently align with their unspoken agenda. Consider the droves who flock to this man’s social media the moment he’s featured on a major platform. It might not be a windfall, but it’s likely substantial. In effect, they’re erecting a glaring billboard for a radical, allowing him to voice what they cannot. That’s one valid reason to single out this loser, I'm sure others exist.
 
It’s entirely reasonable to spotlight this individual, given his repeated appearances on the BBC, a distinction few can claim. Say what you want, but that’s an elite circle. No one’s combing the depths of the internet for just any eccentric’s wild opinions, not in this case anyways.
The problem is that we are being asked to fall for the same hyped-up fake news bait that comprises the entirety of leftist rhetoric. They tightly crop some words/audio/video from a personal source (not an official or organizational source), take it completely out of any and all context, and ask "Did ya' hear what was said? Did ya? Did ya? Did you hear what was said?".

How many do we get every day asking "Did ya' hear what Trump said? Did ya? Did ya? Did ya' hear what Trump said?". At least with Trump it's Trump, but in this case it's literally a guy for whom absolutely no additional information is available. I couldn't even find a bio. Why are we suddenly concerned about a tightly-cropped excerpt from one of his social media posts? A thread dedicated to it?
 
The problem is that we are being asked to fall for the same hyped-up fake news bait that comprises the entirety of leftist rhetoric. They tightly crop some words/audio/video from a personal source (not an official or organizational source), take it completely out of any and all context, and ask "Did ya' hear what was said? Did ya? Did ya? Did you hear what was said?".

How many do we get every day asking "Did ya' hear what Trump said? Did ya? Did ya? Did ya' hear what Trump said?". At least with Trump it's Trump, but in this case it's literally a guy for whom absolutely no additional information is available. I couldn't even find a bio. Why are we suddenly concerned about a tightly-cropped excerpt from one of his social media posts? A thread dedicated to it?
I hear you, and frankly, I couldn’t care less about this dumbass, but apparently the BBC trots him out like he’s the star puppet in their narrative circus. He’s as relevant as most of their legion of brain-dead talking heads, which is to say, barely.

If I had my way, I’d yeet 95% of these media guests into obscurity faster than you can say “breaking news.” Hold up, I’m already the supreme ruler of Tobytone Island, and from my throne, I hereby banish this dimwit and his entire entourage of blabbering buffoons. Laugh if you want, but my royal decree is ironclad. For real.
 
I hear you, and frankly, I couldn’t care less about this dumbass, but apparently the BBC trots him out like he’s the star puppet in their narrative circus. He’s as relevant as most of their legion of brain-dead talking heads, which is to say, barely.
The sad part of all this for me is how the BBC has followed suit with MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, etc. Back around 2000, when CNN and MSNBC had gone full Marxist, I could still count on the BBC to provide accurate and thorough coverage of international news. Yes, the BBC was totally biased regarding local British issues and they HATED the US, but they didn't give a shiit about anything outside of those two countries so the BBC was neutral and dispassionate.

Now, every BBC topic is heavily edited to toe the Marxist party line propaganda.
 
Back
Top