We need an investigation into Loretta Lynch

Stretch

New member
Sen. Dianne Feinstein is right: We need an investigation into Loretta Lynch
Washington Examiner

In 2008, Barack Obama surged past Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary partially because of his pledge to offer a departure from politics as usual in Washington. What Obama gave the country, instead, was an attorney general who allegedly used her office to promote the election of Clinton as his successor.

In a hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee last week, former FBI Director James Comey testified under oath that, in 2016, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch asked him to refer to the investigation in Hillary Clinton's emails as a "matter" rather than an investigation.

According to Comey's testimony:

The Clinton campaign at the time was using all kinds of euphemisms, security matters, things like that for what was going on. We were getting to a place where the attorney general and I were both going to testify and talk publicly about it I wanted to know was she going to authorize us to confirm we have an investigation. She said yes, don't call it that, call it a matter. I said why would I do that? She said, just call it a matter.

"It gave the impression that the attorney general was looking to align the way we talked about our work with the way [the Clinton campaign] was describing that. It was inaccurate," the former FBI director said. "We had an investigation open for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, we had an investigation open at the time. That gave me a queasy feeling."

Even Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., agrees.

article with video continued at http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/s...estigation-into-loretta-lynch/article/2625694
 
"She said yes, don't call it that, call it a matter. I said why would I do that? She said, just call it a matter."

Talk about obstruction! :eek:
 
"She said yes, don't call it that, call it a matter. I said why would I do that? She said, just call it a matter."

Talk about obstruction! :eek:

Been there, done that, it's getting old

Amazing how we got a President who doesn't accept the danger even after all the intelligence entities have labeled Russian involvement in the American election process one of the greatest threats to the country, and conservatives now want to go back and "investigate" events of year ago that amounted to nothing, says a lot
 
Been there, done that, it's getting old

Amazing how we got a President who doesn't accept the danger even after all the intelligence entities have labeled Russian involvement in the American election process one of the greatest threats to the country, and conservatives now want to go back and "investigate" events of year ago that amounted to nothing, says a lot

Amazing how 'old news Hillary' just won't disappear and shut up. Amazing how this is Feinstein asking for this TODAY.
 
Amazing how 'old news Hillary' just won't disappear and shut up. Amazing how this is Feinstein asking for this TODAY.

"old news Hillary" won't disappear because conservatives as yourself have an obsession with her, Clintonphobia, beginning to appear she defines you, then again, seeing conservatives can't defend, explain or even rationalize the guy they elected, it makes sense to avoid that topic and regurgitate scapegoats from the past
 
About as relevant as her future cell number.

Oh, oh, another "lock her up" one, ironic that that the figure associated with that chant has a better chance of looking out from bars than anyone else

Lynch is a diversion from the President's KremlinGate anchor
 
"old news Hillary" won't disappear because conservatives as yourself have an obsession with her, Clintonphobia, beginning to appear she defines you, then again, seeing conservatives can't defend, explain or even rationalize the guy they elected, it makes sense to avoid that topic and regurgitate scapegoats from the past

Sure, we wait with baited breath for her books to come out and her screechy-voiced interviews.
 
Well, not for the books or such, but you always got last year's radio rhetoric, as I noted, just regurgitating the past

And, what a deliciously entertaining past she has...so much so that she continues to drag her same old baggage with her wherever she goes. :)
 
I trust that if Lynch has broken a law and Comey has a tale to tell, it will be investigated. He will tell Senate behind closed doors.
 
Been there, done that, it's getting old

Amazing how we got a President who doesn't accept the danger even after all the intelligence entities have labeled Russian involvement in the American election process one of the greatest threats to the country, and conservatives now want to go back and "investigate" events of year ago that amounted to nothing, says a lot

Yep; liberal dumbfucks can't claim collusion so now the new moronic cry is "he just doesn't care about the danger."

Meanwhile, you classless idiots attempt to make a mockery of our election process and refuse to accept the results. Liberals are the single greatest threat to any society. They're a cancer much like Islam and Communism; full of intolleranxe to anyone who doesn't goose step march to their agenda.
 
What public office does Loretta Lynch currently hold?

I see you're an idiot who also cannot comprehend statutes of limitation. In dumbfuck land, where you wallow, the minute a corrupt member of the Party of the Jackass leaves office, they are immune from their criminal behavior. Think again dumbass.
 
I trust that if Lynch has broken a law and Comey has a tale to tell, it will be investigated. He will tell Senate behind closed doors.

Comey testified that she did obstruct an investigation; funny how his testimony is only credible if involves politicizing Trump.

I'm betting he's too stupid to realize he's incriminating himself and the Obama administration. They really believe that all Americans are as stupid and gullible as you are and that they can get away with it.
 
Lynch is on safe ground...
Trump, on the other hand, is in political and legal peril.

We know how bad you want to believe that lol.

But how do you justify charging Trump with obstruction and *not charge* Lynch? Apart from the fact Lynch worked for Obama---that doesn't count.

And is Comey going to escape two misimprisonment charges if both Lynch and Trump are charged with obstruction? Comey covered himself [no way a man will admit to being a coward in public unless he has a VERY good reason] with having a Snowflake moment when Trump was telling him that he 'hoped' he would find a way out for Flynn.

What would be his excuse with Lynch? See what a mess this is lol? All because you won't accept the results of an election .
 
Back
Top