We can no longer afford to do nothing about Clinton's puzzleheaded revenge fantasies. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on her nettlesome, conceited platitudes. Clinton avers that she is as innocent as a newborn lamb. Go home, Clinton; you're drunk. Any sober person would realize that there is no place in this country where we are safe from Clinton's protégés, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. While some may argue that she has the right, if she so desires, to use psychological tools to trick us into doing whatever she requires of us, I maintain that she has a correlative obligation of responsible self discipline. More precisely, if five years ago I had described a person like Clinton to you and told you that in five years she'd place our children at imminent risk of serious harm, you'd have thought me simple-minded. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how she has been trying hard to separate us off into various, antagonistic camps. I avouch we should oppose that effort by comparing, contrasting, and identifying the connections among different classes of beastly totalitarianism. In a nutshell, I find Hillay Clinton's reification of tribalism a tad disconcerting.
