Washington Post criticized, and lampooned, over Baghdadi headline

Grokmaster

Well-known member
Contributor
Leftist Washington Post criticized, and lampooned, over Baghdadi headline

Sickening , ISLAMIST APOLOGIST FAKE NEWS.


Washington Post criticized, and lampooned, over Baghdadi headline



The Washington Post faced criticism on Sunday for calling Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State group who had died the day before, an "austere religious scholar".

The newspaper amended its headline to call him an "extremist leader".

Vice president of communications Kristine Coratti Kelly said the headline "should never have read that way and we changed it quickly".

Baghdadi detonated a suicide vest during a raid by US special forces.

His death was announced by President Trump in a nationally televised address on Sunday.


The Post faced serious criticism on social media, but many took the opportunity to poke fun at headline using the hashtag #WaPoDeathNotices - tweeting mock headlines for obituaries of notorious figures from history.

"Adolf Hitler, dedicated art enthusiast, animal rights activist, and talented orator, dies at 56," read one.

"Ted Bundy, meticulous researcher, charismatic figure, and Polaroid enthusiast, dead at 42", read another, in reference to the infamous serial killer.
The first version of the Washington Post's headline called Baghdadi "terrorist-in-chief", before it was changed to "austere religious scholar at the helm of Islamic State".





https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50205592
 
Last edited:
OH LOOK!! ANOTHER JPP LEFTIST DEFENDING CHEERLEADING ISLAMIST TERRORSLIME....what a shocker....not.

How lame is that, guess you just can't accept the fact that both the WP and NYT have increased circulation in the era of Trump, they must be doing something right

And there is no way you ever read either newspaper, the reading level required to process it is beyond your capability
 
How lame is that, guess you just can't accept the fact that both the WP and NYT have increased circulation in the era of Trump, they must be doing something right

And there is no way you ever read either newspaper, the reading level required to process it is beyond your capability

Not sure how anyone can defend WAPO on this one.
 
I am sure you produce the WAPO articles to defend that position. Now would be great.

Don't have to, just the narrative on the article, keep in mind it as an obituary, not a headline story as the above implies:

"The original headline read, "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Islamic State’s 'terrorist-in-chief,' dies at 48." But it was later changed to "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, austere religious scholar at helm of Islamic State, dies at 48."

As of Monday morning, the headline was "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, extremist leader of Islamic State, dies at 48."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-washington-post-austere-headline/2483340001/

And throughout the obituary it highlighted that the guy was a terrorist, world's worst terrorist
 
Don't have to, just the narrative on the article, keep in mind it as an obituary, not a headline story as the above implies:

"The original headline read, "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Islamic State’s 'terrorist-in-chief,' dies at 48." But it was later changed to "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, austere religious scholar at helm of Islamic State, dies at 48."

As of Monday morning, the headline was "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, extremist leader of Islamic State, dies at 48."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-washington-post-austere-headline/2483340001/

And throughout the obituary it highlighted that the guy was a terrorist, world's worst terrorist

Of course they changed the headline. They had too. That has become standard operating procedure for left wing media sources.
 
Of course they changed the headline. They had too. That has become standard operating procedure for left wing media sources.

Oh, now we are moving the goal posts I see

Point being it wasn't a major story nor headline in the paper as those above have framed it, it was an obituary, and the headlng was changed, probably in three different editions, but in all three the content included the facts that the guy was terrorist leader
 
Oh, now we are moving the goal posts I see

Point being it wasn't a major story nor headline in the paper as those above have framed it, it was an obituary, and the headlng was changed, probably in three different editions, but in all three the content included the facts that the guy was terrorist leader

How is that moving the goal posts? The WAPO made a terrorist out to be a religious scholar. They were forced to redact that idiocy. Once again, that has become common place for left wing media outlets to do.
 
Back
Top