Based Chad
Was it me?
But not against them enough to actually make an issue of it.
But not against them enough to actually make an issue of it.
cawacko
Well-known member
How does that work? Are there any examples of countries who have successfully done that?
Based Chad
Was it me?
It isn't, the rate of increase in wages never matches the rate of inflation. It is used by the FED to force people to spend the money rather than save as savings loses value, it promotes the very debt bubbles that caused our problems to begin with.
How is posting silly pictures working for you?
Based Chad
Was it me?
This time it can. We are not condemned to repeeat the exact same past policies. We can conduct fed policy with populists instead of elitist values.
Your lack of vision condemns you to a limited reality.
Right, we should do the exact same thing that hasn't worked forever because *this time* it will be different.
One of the signs of insanity is to continue to do the same thing, yet consistently expect a different result. Your lack of knowledge makes you dangerous.
Based Chad
Was it me?
Im not talking about doing the same thing. You are. Im talking about protectionism combined with sufficient capitalization. In the past, the fed only opens up the money gate gate for globalists schemes. Your commitment to internationalist fascism and propaganda makes you a traitor.
Actually you are, you support inflationary overspending because there would be jobs. Basically I said, "Yeah, let's keep jobs here and stop the inflationary practices." to which you said, "No keep the inflationary practices, they'll work THIS TIME!" Just two posts ago. You can read it.
Based Chad
Was it me?
Your summaries in err.
No, they really aren't. You really believe that inflationary stupidity will work "this time", you said so.
Based Chad
Was it me?
They really are. You never said keep jobs here. You just started talking about spending. And im speaking of a new and different direction for fed policy. Not the same globalist crap. creating money is a political act. Im talking about moving fed policy from a globalist to a nationalist paradigm.
Globalist thinking is inherently flawed.
Incorrect, I supported your idea of protectionism with the added condition that we reduce spending so that we would stop the inflationary practices at the same time. You then started off on how great inflationary practices are if they are "populist".
I'm amazed at how you went from how we should go back to bartering to support wholly of the FED in stupid practices which create the very problems we face today.
You are truly incapable of understanding what I say, and I was wrong. Earlier today I said you were consistent. You aren't.
Based Chad
Was it me?
You didnt support it. You just started talking about spending.
Where is your utterance of support? And spending isnt a problem when revenue is sufficient. And revenue is sufficient when keep business here instead of allowing too much imports. your globalist brainwash is enfooling you.
So you want me to go back and read the thread to you. This is a relatively consistent theme with you. So far I've been 100% accurate. Would you like to lay a bet on this time?
Based Chad
Was it me?
Do what you want. Im certain your summarizations are wrong. I said we should keep spending, but not in the same way. If you want to keep simplifying the argument into "its the same thing", you may continue to do so in your characteristically flaccid fashion.
You said:
To Which I answered:
Notice, I was supporting it "only if you curtail spending at the same time"...
Now you are here:
The only fool here is the idiot who now supports wholeheartedly the inflationary practices of the FED so long as they do it in some "populist" fashion.
To Which I answered:
Notice, I was supporting it "only if you curtail spending at the same time"...
Now you are here:
The only fool here is the idiot who now supports wholeheartedly the inflationary practices of the FED so long as they do it in some "populist" fashion.
Based Chad
Was it me?
So you want to return to gold backed currency?
You still didn't support keeping jobs here. Not disagreeing is not support.
Saying we should implement it so long as "this" is done is support even if you are trying real hard to pretend it isn't. And I've always wanted to return to a currency with value. But heck, you want to inflate the crap out of it in some "populist" fashion that will work "this time".
Based Chad
Was it me?
I was talking about you "supporting" protectionism. Returning to hard currency is just a bridge too far for me right now, though i sympathize. We can still conduct fed policy with americans in mind, instead of the global elite.