Voters Trust Trump slightly more then media

anatta

100% recycled karma
just slightly..but considering the thumping the media (sic) have given to Trump it's significant
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ers-divided-over-trusting-trump-or-media.html
Slightly more voters find the White House more truthful than the media, according to the latest Fox News Poll.

In addition, most feel the press is tougher on President Trump than it was on President Obama. But that may be a positive development, as a majority thinks aggressive coverage of the presidency is good for the country.

By a slim 45-42 percent margin, more voters say they trust the Trump administration to “tell the public the truth” than the reporters who cover the White House. Ten percent say neither.


he poll, released Friday, was conducted Saturday through Monday evenings. That was before Trump told reporters at a press conference Thursday, “the public doesn’t believe you people anymore.”
The Fox poll last asked a similar question in June 2006. At that time, “news reporters” were more trusted than “government officials” by a 40-25 percent margin :whoa:
with 26 percent saying neither.
1487364051596.jpg


Some 68 percent think the press has been “tougher” on Trump than Obama. That’s more than three times the number who think reporters are giving him an “easier” time (18 percent). Another 12 percent see treatment of the two as the same.

People want tough press coverage. A majority, 55 percent, thinks it’s better for the country if the news media “cover the president aggressively.” Thirty-eight percent feel it would be better if reporters gave the president the “benefit of the doubt.”

There are the expected partisan differences. Eight in 10 Republicans (81 percent) trust the Trump administration more to tell the truth, while roughly the same portion of Democrats trust the media (79 percent). Independents are twice as likely to put their faith in Trump as the press (52-26 percent), while 16 percent say neither.

Almost all Republicans (92 percent) and most independents (74 percent) perceive coverage as tougher on Trump. Some Democrats agree: 42 percent say it’s been tougher, 34 percent easier, and 21 percent the same.

Over half of conservatives (55 percent) and Republicans (54 percent) want the president to be more careful when he speaks. At the same time, over half of those who voted for Trump in the election like the fact that he speaks his mind (54 percent).
++

The Fox News poll is based on landline and cellphone interviews with 1,013 randomly chosen registered voters nationwide and was conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from February 11-13, 2017. The poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points for all registered voters.
 
Trump doesn't even really know how to tell the truth.
This survey says more about voters than it does about the media or Trump.
It's telling you the media cannot be trusted. all those negative articles stacked up like bowling pins
can be knocked down. Take a look at Wapo or NYTims online -there isn't even a casual desire to show objectivity

Not all of them. But more then not they are so heavily biased against Trump as to be little more then 'newz'.
 
It's telling you the media cannot be trusted. all those negative articles stacked up like bowling pins
can be knocked down. Take a look at Wapo or NYTims online -there isn't even a casual desire to show objectivity

Not all of them. But more then not they are so heavily biased against Trump as to be little more then 'newz'.

Trump is a deranged human being. I think his voters expect the media to pretend that he isn't. I'm glad they call it like it is.
 
The State media keeps reporting rumors with no evidence from anonymous sources ... i.e. FAKE NEWS.
 
Versus Trump who uses "some people say".

Fucking tard.

How is that different from the state media? :rofl2:

You still don't get it.

And don't forget Obama lied, big league.
 
Last edited:
It's not "news" when a position is taken, and more often than not (both in print and in network news shows), a position is strongly detected by readers/viewers. Reporting news is strictly presenting and stating all the facts, and placing them in their proper context. It's not presenting innuendo, unsubstantiated claims, rumors, etc. and whipping people up into a frenzy. You can barely find national news media where there isn't some headline written precisely for click-bait. Many times, the headline is not only misleading, but isn't even backed up by the rest of the article when you read through it all. In visual news media, it's similar. They break news with their own slanted headlines and usually spend only a few seconds on actually stating facts, and quickly throw it to several pundits who put their spin on things. All this is done while real Americans are wondering if anyone is really looking out for them or just trying to grab attention for their own pocket books.
 
the Fox poll last asked a similar question in June 2006. At that time, “news reporters” were more trusted than “government officials” by a 40-25 percent margin
2006 -under Shrub
 
Trump is a deranged human being. I think his voters expect the media to pretend that he isn't. I'm glad they call it like it is.

So the media should just stop being objective as they claim to be? Granted, Trump is being absolutely stupid with his war against much of the media, but they are being as childish and dishonest by their clearly biased reporting.
 
It's not "news" when a position is taken, and more often than not (both in print and in network news shows), a position is strongly detected by readers/viewers. Reporting news is strictly presenting and stating all the facts, and placing them in their proper context. It's not presenting innuendo, unsubstantiated claims, rumors, etc. and whipping people up into a frenzy. You can barely find national news media where there isn't some headline written precisely for click-bait. Many times, the headline is not only misleading, but isn't even backed up by the rest of the article when you read through it all. In visual news media, it's similar. They break news with their own slanted headlines and usually spend only a few seconds on actually stating facts, and quickly throw it to several pundits who put their spin on things. All this is done while real Americans are wondering if anyone is really looking out for them or just trying to grab attention for their own pocket books.

I used to think CNN was the least bias, but ever since last summer and especially since he has won, they have clearly thrown objectivity out the window and are basically an opinion piece when it comes to anything Trump. I don't expect Trump to ever take the high road, I thought he would as president, but that is clearly not the case. CNN is not doing itself any favors by be clearly biased against him, they are in fact proving his point more and more each day.
 
So the media should just stop being objective as they claim to be? Granted, Trump is being absolutely stupid with his war against much of the media, but they are being as childish and dishonest by their clearly biased reporting.

The State media has refused to accept the election results, period. 'Nuff said.
 
Back
Top