US appeals court could reconsider ruling in Trump’s favor on Portland troop deployment

H

Hume

Verified User
A decision in Donald Trump’s favor by a three-judge panel issued on Monday, which lifted a block on his planned deployment of Oregon national guard troops to Portland, could be reconsidered by a new, larger panel of federal appeals court judges.

Hours after the three-judge panel decided, 2-1, that Trump has the legal authority to deploy federalized troops to Portland, a judge on the ninth circuit court of appeals formally requested “a vote on whether this case should be reheard” by a larger panel of judges.

www.theguardian.com

US appeals court could reconsider ruling in Trump’s favor on Portland troop deployment

Judge requests ‘vote on whether case should be reheard’ after panel lifted block on Trump’s planned deployment
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
Hume said:
Unlike you fascists, empiricists know that facts are sharable. All of science is based on this principle.
Click to expand...

Not quite. Science is built on the principle that observations and results should be reproducible and verifiable by others, which implies a form of shareability. The core idea is that science relies on empirical evidence and testable hypotheses, which, when shared, allow for scrutiny and validation.

If you had any sharable facts, you'd post them.
 
Diogenes said:
Not quite. Science is built on the principle that observations and results should be reproducible and verifiable by others, which implies a form of shareability. The core idea is that science relies on empirical evidence and testable hypotheses, which, when shared, allow for scrutiny and validation.

If you had any sharable facts, you'd post them.
Click to expand...
Already told you. Do you know that the Supreme Court decided that officially Trump as President is virtually immune?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top