UN-FREAKING-BELIVABLE

And what is it that you disagree with?
Please give examples and be as precise as you can.


I disagree with all of it. For starters, I have no idea what "non discretionary premarital sex" is nor do I have any idea how it can "collude" with inanimate objects and medical procedures to do anything.

It reads as though Ice Dancer is a program that just spews out right-wing "family values" gobbledygook.
 
I disagree with all of it. For starters, I have no idea what "non discretionary premarital sex" is nor do I have any idea how it can "collude" with inanimate objects and medical procedures to do anything.

It reads as though Ice Dancer is a program that just spews out right-wing "family values" gobbledygook.

I would like to debate this with you; but unfortunetly you cherry picked what was posted and left out the other parts that went along with the two sections you quoted.


It's like be posting a recipe that contains flour, eggs, spices, and other ingrediants, and then saying to bake it at 350 degrees for an hour and then you questioning how baking flour is going to result in anything.
Would you like to try again??
 
Last edited:
I disagree with all of it. For starters, I have no idea what "non discretionary premarital sex" is nor do I have any idea how it can "collude" with inanimate objects and medical procedures to do anything.

It reads as though Ice Dancer is a program that just spews out right-wing "family values" gobbledygook.

Non discretionary- having no discretion. Colluding may have been hyperbolic, but if the attitude behind its usage escapes you I am really not surprised.

The fact of the matter is that your dismissal of what I believe constitues the undermining of families is as irrelevant as you claim my opinion is, as it is merely your own opinion too Nigel.
 
Tell us what you feel....

you, sir, will have no knowledge of my feelings on anyone I hold dear. no offense, but you're a major ass. I have something for you.

assclown.jpg
 
Non discretionary- having no discretion. Colluding may have been hyperbolic, but if the attitude behind its usage escapes you I am really not surprised.

The fact of the matter is that your dismissal of what I believe constitues the undermining of families is as irrelevant as you claim my opinion is, as it is merely your own opinion too Nigel.


Well, I have not expressed any opinion on the matter. You see, I try to shy away from reading horrible stories about horrible people and making grand pronouncements about society at large based on that one horrible person, but that's just me.
 
I would like to debate this with you; but unfortunetly you cherry picked what was posted and left out the other parts that went along with the two sections you quoted.


It's like be posting a recipe that contains flour, eggs, spices, and other ingrediants, and then saying to bake it at 350 degrees for an hour and then you questioning how baking flour is going to result in anything.
Would you like to try again??


Nah, it's more like posting a recipe that contains flour, eggs, guano, manure and feces and questioning why the hell you're cooking with shit.
 
Nah, it's more like posting a recipe that contains flour, eggs, guano, manure and feces and questioning why the hell you're cooking with shit.

I see that once again you missed the correlation of what was posted and what you were asking.
But then after embarassing yoursellf so badly, I can see why you didn't want to address your lack of cognitive thought.
 
I see that once again you missed the correlation of what was posted and what you were asking.
But then after embarassing yoursellf so badly, I can see why you didn't want to address your lack of cognitive thought.


I wasn't asking anything at all. I was merely making an observation. And I'm not certain what I'm supposed to be embarrassed about. Can you clue me in?
 
I see where you're going with this :good4u:

they should be held accountable for allowing those kids to even be near her vicinity after she started in with her rants against them. They failed to protect the children from an abusive mother, even after they knew she was a danger to them.

They did indeed fail to protect the child
 
YEAH!!
How dare they take that 11 year old's feelings into considreration and allow him to try and hug his mother good-bye.
They should have tazed him, the moment he made a move to show his love.

Then DTS could've cut n' pasted the "injustice report" for us!

I'm disappointed that he refuses to share his feelings for the boys with us.

I'm also saddened by his reluctance to reveal the nature of his daily acts of death-defying bravery.
 
Well, I have not expressed any opinion on the matter. You see, I try to shy away from reading horrible stories about horrible people and making grand pronouncements about society at large based on that one horrible person, but that's just me.

No you make shit filled observations and then claim its not an opinion. Like I said you love to eat shit so enjoy your self made meal.
 
typical liberal. just wanting to run off and forget her responsibilities, leaving them to society.

I hope the kids can get through this.

Obviously you're being facetious.

I hardly think this dreg of society gives a hoot about the political system, when she can't even be bothered with caring for her own children.
 
Police spokesman Sgt. Mark Ortega said the boy's mother, Christina Muniz (MYOO'-neez), 29, came out and told officers that she was "sick of her children" and wanted the police to take them so she can "have fun and play."

Is she mentally disabled or something? This kind of behavior is simply not natural.
 
Back
Top