U.S. Navy strike group to move toward Korean peninsula: U.S. official

Bill

Malarkeyville
What happened to the "America first" isolationist guy on tv??

A U.S. Navy strike group will be moving toward the western Pacific Ocean near the Korean peninsula, a U.S. official told Reuters on Saturday, as concerns grow about North Korea's advancing weapons program.

Earlier this month North Korea tested a liquid-fueled Scud missile which only traveled a fraction of its range.

The strike group, called Carl Vinson, includes an aircraft carrier and will make its way from Singapore toward the Korean peninsula, according to the official, who was not authorized to speak to the media and requested anonymity.

"We feel the increased presence is necessary," the official said, citing North Korea's worrisome behavior.

This year North Korean officials, including leader Kim Jong Un, have repeatedly indicated an intercontinental ballistic missile test or something similar could be coming, possibly as soon as April 15, the 105th birthday of North Korea's founding president and celebrated annually as "the Day of the Sun."

Earlier this week U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in Florida, where Trump pressed his counterpart to do more to curb North Korea's nuclear program.

Trump's national security aides have completed a review of U.S. options to try to curb North Korea's nuclear and missile programs. These include economic and military measures but lean more toward sanctions and increased pressure on Beijing to rein in its reclusive neighbor.

Although the option of pre-emptive military strikes on North Korea is not off the table, the review prioritizes less-risky steps and de-emphasizes direct military action.

(Reporting by Idrees Ali; Editing by Richard Chang)
 
What happened to the "America first" isolationist guy on tv??

A U.S. Navy strike group will be moving toward the western Pacific Ocean near the Korean peninsula, a U.S. official told Reuters on Saturday, as concerns grow about North Korea's advancing weapons program.

Earlier this month North Korea tested a liquid-fueled Scud missile which only traveled a fraction of its range.

The strike group, called Carl Vinson, includes an aircraft carrier and will make its way from Singapore toward the Korean peninsula, according to the official, who was not authorized to speak to the media and requested anonymity.

"We feel the increased presence is necessary," the official said, citing North Korea's worrisome behavior.

This year North Korean officials, including leader Kim Jong Un, have repeatedly indicated an intercontinental ballistic missile test or something similar could be coming, possibly as soon as April 15, the 105th birthday of North Korea's founding president and celebrated annually as "the Day of the Sun."

Earlier this week U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in Florida, where Trump pressed his counterpart to do more to curb North Korea's nuclear program.

Trump's national security aides have completed a review of U.S. options to try to curb North Korea's nuclear and missile programs. These include economic and military measures but lean more toward sanctions and increased pressure on Beijing to rein in its reclusive neighbor.

Although the option of pre-emptive military strikes on North Korea is not off the table, the review prioritizes less-risky steps and de-emphasizes direct military action.

(Reporting by Idrees Ali; Editing by Richard Chang)
I know Milo and the guys will be further disappointed.
 
It's a very serious thing to have an aircraft carrier told to change its direction. I believe the USS Carl Vinson was on its way to Australia when told to change course...in this case toward South Korea. Let's hope it's just another serious message, not more. Carriers don't travel alone, I think there are 2 other ships with her.
 
HelleJ20170408A_low.jpg
 
What happened to the "America first" isolationist guy on tv??

He got elected. Welcome to the Trumpton Plan.

Incidentally- sinking all this mass of tonnage would be extremely bad for the marine environment.
 
Last edited:
sooner or later...

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Let our big beautiful ships float around out there. Again, it's appearance...just sit out there on the horizon looking all bad and tough...give Kim a visual to mull around with in his crazy head.
 
He got elected. Welcome to the Trumpton Plan.

Incidentally- sinking all this mass of tonnage would be extremely bad for the marine environment.
Yep....Korea is anxiously anticipating these sitting ducks in their back yard.
 
Russia just suspended key military agreements with the US — raising the risk of war
http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-air-agreement-syriaus-missile-strike-assad-2017-4

In less than 100 days this cartoon president has this nation standing on the brink of war on several fronts.

Wars with nations with nuclear arms.

Who knows what Putin's endgame is?

... all this with a clown as commander-in-chief.
I have that adblocked..but this is why it's better to find common ground with Putin, then go into the John McCain frenzied "Putin is a KGB murderous thug" realtionship..

The Dem's don't really give a damn about Putin one way or the other- all they care about is lambasting Trump .. and they'll align with such creatures as McCain & Graham
 
I have that adblocked..but this is why it's better to find common ground with Putin, then go into the John McCain frenzied "Putin is a KGB murderous thug" realtionship..

The Dem's don't really give a damn about Putin one way or the other- all they care about is lambasting Trump .. and they'll align with such creatures as McCain & Graham

Wrong. Democrats and anybody who knows anything about geopolitical politics, including a great many republicans, don't trust Putin.

Putin IS a murderous KGB thug. How is it that you think he's different? Based on what?

Neither Trump nor you know what Putin's endgame is. You have no idea, no clue what that is.

What is known is that he cannot be trusted.
 
Wrong. Democrats and anybody who knows anything about geopolitical politics, including a great many republicans, don't trust Putin.

Putin IS a murderous KGB thug. How is it that you think he's different? Based on what?

Neither Trump nor you know what Putin's endgame is. You have no idea, no clue what that is.

What is known is that he cannot be trusted.
well you certainly can structure a deal that benefits both parties..we did this even with the USSR.

do you recall "trust but verify?" and that was with nuclear weapons! (MAD)..

I don't view Putin as a madman -he's a calculating geopolitical chess player
 
well you certainly can structure a deal that benefits both parties..we did this even with the USSR.

do you recall "trust but verify?" and that was with nuclear weapons! (MAD)..

I don't view Putin as a madman -he's a calculating geopolitical chess player

I didn't say Putin was a madman .. I and just about everyone else know him to be a murderous KGB thug .. with the history to prove it.

Your warm and fuzzy for Putin is based on your support for Trump, not based on any evidence that Putin is trustworthy.

From your side of the aisle ..

It's time to realize that Vladimir Putin can't be trusted
http://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/its-time-realize-vladimir-putin-cant-be-trusted

Don't Trust Putin
https://www.forbes.com/sites/anderscorr/2016/09/03/dont-trust-putin/#565a9b67199
 
You supported him, cuck -fuck so shut the fuck up.

No- I supported the other guy. Who the hell is this guy ?

Now let's have some manners from you, please, or I'll ridicule you in public- and you'll wind up like the Brit maggot; isolated, craven and humiliated.
 
Russia just suspended key military agreements with the US — raising the risk of war
http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-air-agreement-syriaus-missile-strike-assad-2017-4

In less than 100 days this cartoon president has this nation standing on the brink of war on several fronts.

Wars with nations with nuclear arms.

Who knows what Putin's endgame is?

... all this with a clown as commander-in-chief.

Lol, wasn't your dumbass just saying that Trump is Putins puppet.

Hysterical liberals can't make up their mind.
 
I didn't say Putin was a madman .. I and just about everyone else know him to be a murderous KGB thug .. with the history to prove it.
Your warm and fuzzy for Putin is based on your support for Trump, not based on any evidence that Putin is trustworthy.

From your side of the aisle ..

It's time to realize that Vladimir Putin can't be trusted
http://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/its-time-realize-vladimir-putin-cant-be-trusted

Don't Trust Putin
https://www.forbes.com/sites/anderscorr/2016/09/03/dont-trust-putin/#565a9b67199

Heriatge I'm not gonna read -TY, but the Forbes piece is more of the same "Putin is a killer"
so what? I mean that literally SO WHAT? ( and the article mentions Iraq of all things)

Are we not killers - you know we are -we do what we do where we can get away with it.
I don't see Putin doing anything different. we can claim some moral highground here and there
but when push comes to shove we engage in regime change because we (think) it'sbeneficail

The question is then "Is Putin a rationalist" can he make a deal and can we both keep the deal.
I don't see any reason why not. We've dealt with murderers before.

We structure deals along the lines where everybody gains and everybody gives..
This is SOP among nation states. since time immemorial
 
well you certainly can structure a deal that benefits both parties..we did this even with the USSR.

do you recall "trust but verify?" and that was with nuclear weapons! (MAD)..

I don't view Putin as a madman -he's a calculating geopolitical chess player

Putin is absolutely sane.

The little NK bastard, not so much. Sooner or later the little madman is going to launch one, the only question is who gets it first.
 
Putin is absolutely sane.

The little NK bastard, not so much. Sooner or later the little madman is going to launch one, the only question is who gets it first.
excellent insight.
lil Kim really is a madman- he only gets away with it because of China-but one of these days...
Putin on the other hand will push and shove & ooze and fill in where he can,
but he's not going to launch nukes "just because"
 
Back
Top