Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
American voters will face a choice of historically negative magnitude, between two major-party candidates whom the public, as a whole, intensely dislike.
We only started polling on trustworthiness and character of candidates in the 1950s. But since we’ve been doing it, these are the least-trusted pair of candidates by far. There has never been anything like it, at least in modern times.
In theory, a public mood of deep distrust of government and politicians should have made voters hungry for an impeccable, plausible ― and presumably younger and less damaged ― newcomer.
It hasn’t worked out that way. Some of the reasons are particular to the Democratic and Republican parties.
Midterm elections in 2010 and 2014, both characterized by backlash to Barack Obama’s presidential victories, wiped out a younger generation of potential challengers to a Clinton brand that was launched in the 1980s.
Hillary was left facing a ridiculously weak field. I like Bernie Sanders, but come on. The fact that he got as far as he did, showed that there really wasn’t anybody to knock off Hillary.
On the GOP side, the party was the victim of the cynicism it had sowed for decades about the role of government ― and politicians. And the often valid critique of “big” government transformed in the Obama years into an open, out-and-out hatred of immigrants, minorities and any “other” who threatened white voters.
The Republicans since 2010 have been electing more and more extreme candidates,. The Tea Party and its aftermath was never just about Obamacare ― it was about THEM.
The natural result was Donald Trump ― it would have been Ted Cruz had it not been for Trump.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-popularity-trust_us_5782b2b3e4b01edea78e7277?section=