No previous speaker did this. Only Pelosi is special enough for it.TO be fair, Romney is not the Speaker of the House.
No previous speaker did this. Only Pelosi is special enough for it.TO be fair, Romney is not the Speaker of the House.
She needs to be more security conshous than Romney.
Do you think the President and Vice President should also fly commercial?
so what? does that mean she should have better healthcare too? i dont care if shes the pope.. In a major recession taking expensive private jets around the world bitching about CEO's making to much money. Its disgusting to listen too.
No previous speaker did this. Only Pelosi is special enough for it.
Ah... Okay. I think the VP could survive just fine taking the train and the Speaker would be fine refueling. What she wanted to do was avoid actually having to talk to citizens.No, Damo, that's not true. The speaker has had a plane for quite a while. Pelosi wanted an upgraded plane with expanded range so that she could fly to Washington without refueling in case of an emergency. But there was already a plane for the speaker.
The speaker is third in line for succession, but literally probably second in line to the president in terms of actual power. She needs a secure mode of transport more than the VP does.
Ah... Okay. I think the VP could survive just fine taking the train and the Speaker would be fine refueling.
What she wanted to do was avoid actually having to talk to citizens.![]()
In those situations she could easily be allowed to charter a trip on more available transport.In normal circumstances, sure. If a war breaks out or something, the speaker needs to get to Washington as fast as possible if shes in recess.
I wouldn't blame her, but there are valid national security concerns here.
In those situations she could easily be allowed to charter a trip on more available transport.
Again. Take away the plane, she can get where she needs to go using regular transport, if the stuff is hitting the fan she/he can then charter a more direct transport. They can rely on the same effective security we all must rely on when flying.Damo, the brilliant military strategist.
If the speaker is going to have a plane it should get them where they need to go.
Someone was just being a douchebag in front of him. There was no need to get violent.
One of the biggest problems with southerners like STY is their defense of resorting to violence in every possible matter. It's the reason we have such dramatically higher murder rates than liberal states.
No previous speaker did this. Only Pelosi is special enough for it.
Catch up. Ugh...Ohh, I see, because noone in the past ever did it, that makes it bad to do now!
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blog...tened-by-air-canada-passenger/article1469196/
One for flying on a commercial plane in row 15 while he is a multi milllionaire.
Two for taking the non-violent approach to being attacked.