Trumps Ego Stumbles his National Camapign

anatta

100% recycled karma
A constant stream of changes and scuffles are unsettling Donald J. Trump’s campaign team, including the abrupt dismissal this week of his national political director.

A sense of paranoia is growing among his campaign staff members, including some who have told associates they believe that their Trump Tower offices in New York may be bugged, according to three people briefed on the conversations.

And there is confusion among his donors, who want to give money to a “super PAC” supporting Mr. Trump, but have received conflicting signals from top aides about which one to support.

On Thursday, Mr. Trump secured the Republican Party’s nomination for president, a remarkable achievement for a political newcomer. But inside his campaign, the limits of his managerial style — reliant on his gut and built around his unpredictable personality — are vividly on display, according to interviews with nearly a dozen Republicans inside and outside of the operation.


Two months after assurances that the candidate would become “more presidential” and transition to a more unifying phase of his campaign, Mr. Trump continues to act as if the primary is still underway. His team has struggled to fill top positions, such as communications director, and Mr. Trump has made clear he still sees himself as his own chief adviser.

This week, Mr. Trump fired Rick Wiley, his national political director, after Mr. Wiley clashed with campaign officials in three states. And while fights among aides are not unusual, the daily leaks of damaging information from his campaign are prompting worry among Republican officials.

Candidate Trump needs to better understand that he is now the titular head of the G.O.P.,” said Scott W. Reed, senior political strategist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “His words and actions will have an impact on the over 6,000 G.O.P. candidates running for office — from federal races down to the courthouse.”


Asked for comment about his management style, and the current state of his campaign, Mr. Trump declined, criticizing the reporters writing this article. “You two wouldn’t know how to write a good story about me if you tried — dream on,” Mr. Trump said in an email relayed by his spokeswoman, Hope Hicks.

So far, Mr. Trump has shown little inclination to adjust to a political world. His penchant for setting up competition and infusing tension between his subordinates has carried over from his real estate company.

“He certainly does love playing people against each other, but in my experience he knew how to make me reach my potential

But, as was the case with Mr. Wiley’s dismissal, Mr. Trump is reliant on information he garners himself, and can be swayed by the last person he talked to.
On Wednesday, for instance, Mr. Trump met with dozens of female chief executives and entrepreneurs before his afternoon rally in California, a meeting that was never publicized. Instead, the campaign sent out a message announcing Mr. Wiley’s dismissal.

The shake-up also hindered the campaign from pouncing on the tough day his likely Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, was having, on the heels of a State Department inspector general’s report on her use of a private email server when she was secretary of state.


The drama in Trumpville this week,” Mr. Reed said, totally overtook the “devastating” report, which, he added, “should be all the country is talking about.”

Now, many Republican officials worry that Mr. Trump is uninterested in transitioning into his new role, including the rigors of going up against Mrs. Clinton in a general election fight.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/u...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
 
He's running his campaign out of his head. No nat'l campaign manger would put up with that,
and the chaos is costing him points. I wonder if he could actually be "presidential"
 
He's running his campaign out of his head. No nat'l campaign manger would put up with that,
and the chaos is costing him points. I wonder if he could actually be "presidential"

If Trump's executive style is to micro-manage he needs to unlearn that real quick. You can get away with that, at least to a degree, running a corporation. A country, not so much.
 
He's running his campaign out of his head. No nat'l campaign manger would put up with that,
and the chaos is costing him points. I wonder if he could actually be "presidential"
a friend who is politically savvy and myself were speaking yesterday. we both agree Clinton is unacceptable for myriad of reasons.
But we both are concerned that Trump can't "dial it back" - he has to get in every little squabble in the campaign.

Which means he could be easily distracted etc. One one hand he is successful, on the other hand he shows no ability to prioritize.
So do you take a chance on that, or go with a really bad choice in Clinton?
I think that's the campaign right there.
 
a friend who is politically savvy and myself were speaking yesterday. we both agree Clinton is unacceptable for myriad of reasons.
But we both are concerned that Trump can't "dial it back" - he has to get in every little squabble in the campaign.

Which means he could be easily distracted etc. One one hand he is successful, on the other hand he shows no ability to prioritize.
So do you take a chance on that, or go with a really bad choice in Clinton?
I think that's the campaign right there.

That's kind of where I'm at. Known vs unknown. I'm ready to roll the dice on Trump because Hillary will do a lot of things besides surprise anyone.

The anti-Trump people will never admit it, but Trump definitely has potential for an upside that Hillary simply doesn't possess. There is something to be said for putting America first. Hope n Change was an empty campaign slogan, but you can actually put 'America first' into practice.

When world leaders whine about being uncomfortable with Trump, that's code for 'we might not be able to screw them on trade deals or treaties if Trump gets elected'. Pure and simple. Iran for example, would much rather deal with a docile and naive John Kerry than whoever Trump would appoint.

But Trump does need to restrain himself and/or learn to trust the people around him. It's odd, because he's run a brilliant campaign, even in spite of himself lol. And if there's even a modest chance he could lead brilliantly when elected....it's a no-brainer to me.

I'm voting for Trump.
 
a friend who is politically savvy and myself were speaking yesterday. we both agree Clinton is unacceptable for myriad of reasons.
But we both are concerned that Trump can't "dial it back" - he has to get in every little squabble in the campaign.

Which means he could be easily distracted etc. One one hand he is successful, on the other hand he shows no ability to prioritize.
So do you take a chance on that, or go with a really bad choice in Clinton?
I think that's the campaign right there.




you and your friend are fucking traitors to this nation
 
That's kind of where I'm at. Known vs unknown. I'm ready to roll the dice on Trump because Hillary will do a lot of things besides surprise anyone.

The anti-Trump people will never admit it, but Trump definitely has potential for an upside that Hillary simply doesn't possess. There is something to be said for putting America first. Hope n Change was an empty campaign slogan, but you can actually put 'America first' into practice.

When world leaders whine about being uncomfortable with Trump, that's code for 'we might not be able to screw them on trade deals or treaties if Trump gets elected'. Pure and simple. Iran for example, would much rather deal with a docile and naive John Kerry than whoever Trump would appoint.

But Trump does need to restrain himself and/or learn to trust the people around him. It's odd, because he's run a brilliant campaign, even in spite of himself lol. And if there's even a modest chance he could lead brilliantly when elected....it's a no-brainer to me.

I'm voting for Trump.
that's our reasoning too. the "potential upside"- but damn I wish he would get some discipline.
I am looking at 3rd party or Trump - i'd much rather go Trump for the upset of establishment politics,
and because he does mirror Bernie on trade . Again Clinton fails in every metric.
Trump needs campaign guidance, and his ego needs subordination to a cause greater then himself.
 
Back
Top