Trump voters would be among the biggest losers in Republicans' Obamacare replacement

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Trump voters, deserve to be the biggest losers for putting this nutcase in office in the first place!

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-obamacare-trump-supporters-20170312-story,amp.html

healthtoon01.jpg
 
Last edited:
Include all women in that group...not just those who are subservient to their Republican husbands, and were forced to vote for trump.

Even though this bill, or anything resembling this bill will never see the light of day, women would pay double what men pay for health insurance under this bill.
 
Include all women in that group...not just those who are subservient to their Republican husbands, and were forced to vote for trump.

Even though this bill, or anything resembling this bill will never see the light of day, women would pay double what men pay for health insurance under this bill.

that's because woman spend more on healthcare. when women and men are charged "equally" men are actually the ones being effectively charged more. dumb ho.

lets say we order a pizza, and each slice is a dollar. I eat 3 slices and christiefan eats 5. Under obama care, we are each paying 4 dollars because that's "fair?"

Stupid dumb ho women actually believe this.

If we changed it to the man paying 3 and the woman paying 5, all of a sudden it's oppression..lol.
 
CBO: 14 million people would lose coverage next year under GOP health care plan

that's because woman spend more on healthcare. when women and men are charged "equally" men are actually the ones being effectively charged more. dumb ho.

lets say we order a pizza, and each slice is a dollar. I eat 3 slices and christiefan eats 5. Under obama care, we are each paying 4 dollars because that's "fair?"

Stupid dumb ho women actually believe this.

If we changed it to the man paying 3 and the woman paying 5, all of a sudden it's oppression..lol.

Hope all the 14 million losing their health coverage under the GOP health plan are Trump voters too!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/behind-t...s-obamacare-replacement-report-184603210.html

-bbd1049c754cbda3.JPG


Just in, Ken is dying of AIDS! Pray for me!:)
man-dying-of-aids.jpg
 
Include all women in that group...not just those who are subservient to their Republican husbands, and were forced to vote for trump.

Even though this bill, or anything resembling this bill will never see the light of day, women would pay double what men pay for health insurance under this bill.

You seriously believe women want to vote democrat but their hubbies make them vote republican?

Seriously?
 
maybe just don't repeal it,and let it continue in a death spiral. The Dem's couldn't complain
Exactly what I've said.
That would satisfy dims and pubs.
Healthcare is a losing issue for any party that takes it on. It's like that children's game hot potato.
Obamacare was a loser for dims and if the American Health Care Act gets passed I predict it will be a loser for pubs, although I don't know exactly what's in it. Anything short of a system where everybody pays into it will be deemed unacceptable to segments of society.
As I said from the beginning, Obamacare had winners and losers, but unforeseen by me at the time, far more losers.
 
Include all women in that group...not just those who are subservient to their Republican husbands, and were forced to vote for trump.
Uh, how were they "forced" to vote for anybody ???? Did their hubbies go into the booth with gun pointed at their head?
Prediction: I won't get a (real) answer, if one at all. Too inconvenient.
 
that's because woman spend more on healthcare. when women and men are charged "equally" men are actually the ones being effectively charged more. dumb ho.

lets say we order a pizza, and each slice is a dollar. I eat 3 slices and christiefan eats 5. Under obama care, we are each paying 4 dollars because that's "fair?"

Stupid dumb ho women actually believe this.

If we changed it to the man paying 3 and the woman paying 5, all of a sudden it's oppression..lol.
Cost sharing is the only way insurance works. It's not a new concept. Women pay for boner pills, and men pay for birth control/maternity.

Given the a la carte plan Republicans are offering, women and seniors get killed. I paid for the elderly for almost 40 years. Now this plan will charge older people 5 times what younger people pay. It won't work. Given the billions in tax savings for insurance companies, premiums should be halved.

But the only thing we'll see is higher CEO pay, and larger dividends.

Good thing this idea is DOA
 
Uh, how were they "forced" to vote for anybody ???? Did their hubbies go into the booth with gun pointed at their head?
Prediction: I won't get a (real) answer, if one at all. Too inconvenient.
Every Republican knows that the woman must submit to her husband.


In a speech at a mega-church in the Minneapolis area back in 2006, Michele Bachmann explained her decision to pursue tax law. It wasn't her choice, exactly. God had already told her to go to law school; God had also told her to marry a fellow named Marcus Bachmann. Now Marcus told her "to go and get a post-doctorate degree in tax law." This was not a particular desire of Michele's ("Tax law? I hate taxes!"), but she was certain God was speaking through her husband.
"Why should I go and do something like that?" she recalled thinking. "But the Lord says, 'Be submissive wives; you are to be submissive to your husbands.' "


http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_facto..._claims_to_be_submissive_to_her_husband_.html
 
Exactly what I've said.
That would satisfy dims and pubs.
Healthcare is a losing issue for any party that takes it on. It's like that children's game hot potato.
Obamacare was a loser for dims and if the American Health Care Act gets passed I predict it will be a loser for pubs, although I don't know exactly what's in it. Anything short of a system where everybody pays into it will be deemed unacceptable to segments of society.
As I said from the beginning, Obamacare had winners and losers, but unforeseen by me at the time, far more losers.
What program does work when key funding is removed for political purposes? Republicans wanted it to fail, and it will fail without funding.

Now, why don't they start by selling across state lines as the first order of business? And what ever happened to that Conservative panacea....TORT reform?
 
No surprise there. Trump has been scamming his investors for years. The more you trust him, the more you lose in the end. Everyone in Atlantic City knows that. Trump promised better, cheaper coverage for everyone. Instead, he is pushing tax cuts for millionaires and fifteen million people kicked off the insurance rolls. He lied! Of course he lied, and the working-class suckers who believed his lies are taking it in the shorts -- or they would be if his own GOP was dumb enough to sign on to his kamikaze dive. The guy is a sick joke.
 
No surprise there. Trump has been scamming his investors for years. The more you trust him, the more you lose in the end. Everyone in Atlantic City knows that. Trump promised better, cheaper coverage for everyone. Instead, he is pushing tax cuts for millionaires and fifteen million people kicked off the insurance rolls. He lied! Of course he lied, and the working-class suckers who believed his lies are taking it in the shorts -- or they would be if his own GOP was dumb enough to sign on to his kamikaze dive. The guy is a sick joke.
They get to say 'average costs for coverage will go down'.

Yes, because they're going to bring back policies that cost $100/month, but don't cover anything. Average out everyone's skyrocketing premiums, and you get to claim that it will be cheaper.
 
Every Republican knows that the woman must submit to her husband.


In a speech at a mega-church in the Minneapolis area back in 2006, Michele Bachmann explained her decision to pursue tax law. It wasn't her choice, exactly. God had already told her to go to law school; God had also told her to marry a fellow named Marcus Bachmann. Now Marcus told her "to go and get a post-doctorate degree in tax law." This was not a particular desire of Michele's ("Tax law? I hate taxes!"), but she was certain God was speaking through her husband.
"Why should I go and do something like that?" she recalled thinking. "But the Lord says, 'Be submissive wives; you are to be submissive to your husbands.' "


http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_facto..._claims_to_be_submissive_to_her_husband_.html
Even dumber than I expected. Sometimes it's better to say nothing.
 
Back
Top