Trump suggests U.S. should bomb Libya: stomps on own message re: Clinton

anatta

100% recycled karma
— Donald Trump on Friday suggested that the United States should bomb ISIS in Libya, a decision that would mark a serious escalation of the U.S. military campaign against the terrorist group. It's also a new position for Trump, who has argued both in favor of and against military intervention in Libya over the past five years.

Claiming that ISIS controls oil fields in Libya, the presumptive Republican nominee questioned during a rally here why the United States isn't "bombing the hell out of" ISIS in Libya.

"
ISIS has the oil. And then you say if ISIS has the oil, why aren't we blockading so they can't sell it? Why aren't we bombing the hell out of --"
Trump said, stopping short as he pivoted to slamming President Barack Obama as "grossly incompetent."

The U.S. has bombed ISIS in Libya, including a major strike on an ISIS camp back in February. The Pentagon recently acknowledged there is a "concept of operations" for Libya that includes continued airstrikes against ISIS targets when they can be located.

Trump has previously argued in favor of bombing oil fields in ISIS hands in Iraq -- where the U.S. already has several thousand troops -- but his remarks on Friday mark the first time the de facto Republican nominee has raised the possibility of a U.S. military campaign in another country.


Although Trump has emphasized a foreign policy of "America First" and railed against foreign entanglements, he has repeatedly said the U.S. needs to "knock out" ISIS.

And despite Trump's claim, ISIS does not control oil fields in Libya, though supply lines have been disrupted by ISIS assaults in the North African country.

The Trump campaign did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Trump raised the possibility of another U.S. military intervention just as he slammed former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee, for arguing in favor of the 2011 NATO bombing campaign that ousted Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

"Her decision to go in -- and this was her baby, Libya -- was a disaster," Trump said Friday.

Trump has repeatedly railed against the U.S. decision to strike Libya as part of a multinational campaign, which he has used to question Clinton's judgment.

But Trump in 2011 also argued in favor of a military intervention in Libya.

"
We should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives," Trump said in February 2011, a month before NATO launched its military intervention.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/27/politics/donald-trump-libya-isis/
 
Last edited:
hoo boy..how does he get everything wrong in 1 press conference?

1.ISIS ( Sirte basin) does not control oil -it has helped keep Libyan oil down to about 330k BBD. But that was before ISIS also.

2.Then he (correctly) blames Clinton for the intervention - she was indeed chief architect and advocate for Libyan War 2011.

3. Libya has 2 1/2 governments ( Unity, HoR, and Tripoli..sort of) - none want western bombings.

4. "ISIS has the oil. And then you say if ISIS has the oil, why aren't we blockading so they can't sell it? Why aren't we bombing the hell out of it"
^ that is so bad I can't even deconstruct it.
 
Last week, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon tried to put to bed questions about whether Britain is planning to deploy the Army to Libya, where, just 200 miles from Europe, Isis has flourished amid a permanent state of chaos after the 2011 Nato-backed overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi.

Fallon said Britain is not planning a “combat role” for British troops in Libya; if the army were to be deployed in Libya, Parliament would discuss it first.

But just two days after his comments the Times reported that British Special Air Service troops are already in Libya and were seen earlier in May blowing up an Isis vehicle laden with explosives near Misrata.

What is still not clear is who exactly Britain is fighting alongside in a country that doesn’t have an effective government or army.

Britain is at war in Libya and nobody thought to tell us
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...a-and-nobody-thought-to-tell-us-a7052356.html

web-libya-soldiers-get.jpg

Fighters loyal to Libya's Government of National Accord prepare to launch attacks against Isis as they continue their resistance on the outskirts of the western city of Sirte
 
Last edited:
Last week, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon tried to put to bed questions about whether Britain is planning to deploy the Army to Libya, where, just 200 miles from Europe, Isis has flourished amid a permanent state of chaos after the 2011 Nato-backed overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi.

Fallon said Britain is not planning a “combat role” for British troops in Libya; if the army were to be deployed in Libya, Parliament would discuss it first.

But just two days after his comments the Times reported that British Special Air Service troops are already in Libya and were seen earlier in May blowing up an Isis vehicle laden with explosives near Misrata.

What is still not clear is who exactly Britain is fighting alongside in a country that doesn’t have an effective government or army.

Britain is at war in Libya and nobody thought to tell us
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...a-and-nobody-thought-to-tell-us-a7052356.html

web-libya-soldiers-get.jpg

Fighters loyal to Libya's Government of National Accord prepare to launch attacks against Isis as they continue their resistance on the outskirts of the western city of Sirte

Those special forces like the SAS should target the people traffickers that are sending tens of thousands of migrants out into the Mediterranean on overcrowded unseaworthy craft.
 
This mess is O-BOMB-YA and the Hildebeast's fault.

there is plenty of blame to go around, but yes HRClinton was the driving force beyond a "no fly" zone, to military interventionism
after her meetings with the NTC's Jabril in Paris.

Sarkozy of France was the impetus for the UN resolution. It's a cluster of "smart power" (Hillary's words).
5 years later the country is a failed state with ISIS infestations, that is slowly trying to unify

details here: my blog spot. --> Libyan Civil War 2014 - Present
 
Last edited:
Those special forces like the SAS should target the people traffickers that are sending tens of thousands of migrants out into the Mediterranean on overcrowded unseaworthy craft.
It's hard to stop the smugglers once they get thru to Libya -it's a quick dash to the coast by then, and there are ready boats for the right price.
The UK is now doing this to augment the Libyan navy/coast guard,

Migrant crisis: UK set to send Royal Navy warship to Libya
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36394597
The new Government of National Accord (GNA) in Libya last week asked the European Union - which is running a mission, called Operation Sophia, in the area - for more assistance.
It requested help in training its navy and coastguard, as well as stopping the trafficking of migrants across the Mediterranean.

The GNA is also believed to be considering a request for international ships to operate in Libyan waters
 
Back
Top