Trump says Republicans should 'nationalize' voting in at least 15 places

H

Hume

Verified User
WASHINGTON, Feb 2 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Monday that Republicans should "nationalize" and "take over" voting in at least 15 unspecified places, reiterating his false claims that U.S. elections are marred by widespread fraud.

www.reuters.com

Trump says Republicans should 'nationalize' voting in at least 15 places

President Donald Trump said on Monday that Republicans should "nationalize" and "take over" voting in at least 15 unspecified places, reiterating his false claims that U.S. elections are marred by widespread fraud.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
 
Hume said:
Yes. Showing the US Constitution only as good as its enforcement.
Click to expand...
Time for Congress to wake up and do something about Trump before it is too late.
Time for everybody to call/ text/ email /write their Congressmen and tell them to get off their lazy asses and do something, Trump HAS to be removed one way or another, the 25 th or impeach him do something!
 
Hume said:
WASHINGTON, Feb 2 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Monday that Republicans should "nationalize" and "take over" voting in at least 15 unspecified places, reiterating his false claims that U.S. elections are marred by widespread fraud.

www.reuters.com

Trump says Republicans should 'nationalize' voting in at least 15 places

President Donald Trump said on Monday that Republicans should "nationalize" and "take over" voting in at least 15 unspecified places, reiterating his false claims that U.S. elections are marred by widespread fraud.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
Click to expand...
Completely disagree. ALL national elections should be nationalized. State and local election leave alone.
 
Donald Trump is Exhibit One in the case of why federal elections should be left just as The Constitution leaves them. It's pointless arguing about this anyway. There is zero likelihood of changing it.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Yeah, that brain fart isn't going to work. :nono:
Banning Dominion machines and requiring watermarked ballots could be done.
States have to meet the standards of other states, or else their votes get discounted..like that. :dunno:
Click to expand...
Where does it say " states have to meet the standards of other states" ?
It states in the Constitution that it is up to each states legislature how they want to choose their representatives.
 
martin said:
Every state has laws and procedures that enable and assure responsible elections.
Click to expand...
Oh I agree but it does state right in the Constitution that state legislatures are the ones that say how they are going to appoint their representatives. Heck if the state legislature decides just to appoint who they want without elections they can.
I am sure IF they ever did this they wouldn't have a job for long.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Yeah, that brain fart isn't going to work. :nono:
Banning Dominion machines and requiring watermarked ballots could be done.
States have to meet the standards of other states, or else their votes get discounted..like that. :dunno:
Click to expand...
No, there is nothing in the Constitution that says "states have to meet the standards of other states".

What is a state decided you must be a landowner to vote and demanded every other state meet those standards?
 
martin said:
Every state has laws and procedures that enable and assure responsible elections.
Click to expand...
But if states make rules that favor one candidate or party over another then the federal govt should step in to correct that. It's funny how you twats are suddenly all about states rights and you're pro gun so idiots like pretti can carry at a protest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top