Trump inauguration ratings second biggest in 36 years

O

OldMercsRule

Verified User
"Trump inauguration ratings second biggest in 36 years

James Hibberd@JamesHibberd

Updated January 22, 2017 at 10:57am EST

...And actually, Trump could have been seen by more viewers than either Obama or Reagan. Nielsen ratings do not account for online viewing, which has grown sharply in recent years and is far more commonplace than even four years ago. CNN.com, for example, clocked 16.9 million live streams, tying*with its Election Day coverage for the site’s top event (live stream tallies are typically not apples-to-apples with Nielsen’s strict methodology of counting average viewers, but are still additive). Plus, portals like YouTube,*Facebook and Twitter offered live streams as well..."

http://ew.com/tv/2017/01/21/trump-inauguration-ratings/

The ol' Dumpster does get attention...
 
OldMercsRule said:
"Trump inauguration ratings second biggest in 36 years

James Hibberd@JamesHibberd

Updated January 22, 2017 at 10:57am EST

...And actually, Trump could have been seen by more viewers than either Obama or Reagan. Nielsen ratings do not account for online viewing, which has grown sharply in recent years and is far more commonplace than even four years ago. CNN.com, for example, clocked 16.9 million live streams, tying*with its Election Day coverage for the site’s top event (live stream tallies are typically not apples-to-apples with Nielsen’s strict methodology of counting average viewers, but are still additive). Plus, portals like YouTube,*Facebook and Twitter offered live streams as well..."

http://ew.com/tv/2017/01/21/trump-inauguration-ratings/

The ol' Dumpster does get attention...
Click to expand...

The online views were at least 25 percent of the total views.
 
Like watching a slow motion train wreck, as horrible as it is, people have to look to make sure it's really happening.

His popularity ratings are historically low for any new President.

Doubtful he'll last one full term.
 
Micawber said:
The photos prove nobody showed. It was a non show inauguration, befitting the illegitimate usurper.
Click to expand...

It wasn't nearly the 2009 crowd, butt: It was a very large crowd.

I'm a sceptic of the media's photos as the time of the photo, relative to the crowd arriving, is very easy to manipulate.

All that aside, Dumpster's inaugural was prolly viewed by a record number of eyeballs, as the article states, eh; $0.25?
 
OldMercsRule said:
It wasn't nearly the 2009 crowd, butt: It was a very large crowd.

I'm a sceptic of the media's photos as the time of the photo, relative to the crowd arriving, is very easy to manipulate.

All that aside, Dumpster's inaugural was prolly viewed by a record number of eyeballs, as the article states, eh; $0.25?
Click to expand...

Skeptical of the media. Why in the world for? ;)
 
Nomad said:
Like watching a slow motion train wreck, as horrible as it is, people have to look to make sure it's really happening.

His popularity ratings are historically low for any new President.

Doubtful he'll last one full term.
Click to expand...

People are always skeeeered of change.

Dumpster is a high risk POTUS, butt: if he does a good job you dim wit Democrats have big troubles.
 
OldMercsRule said:
Making this one the most watched ever, if that is the case.
Click to expand...

Exactly, CNN knows this but can't bring themselves to admit it as Trump will likely be barring them from daily briefings and news conferences since they are not news in the first place. Online is where much of the viewing is now as everyone is connected with a cell phone, except the Clinton car smashers perhaps................
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top