Trump had the advantage

[Timshel]

in showing animus towards the constitution.

Trump attacked...
The 2nd, 5th and 14th amendments with his support of "no fly no buy."
The 4th with his call for nationwide "stop and frisk."
The 5th again when criticizing the testimony of Hillary's staff.

Clinton attacked...
The 2nd, 5th and 14th amendments with her support of "no fly no buy."
She vaguely touched on the 4th with a call for more information gathering.

Clinton defended...
The 4th against Donald's "stop and frisk" proposal.

So, by my count, Donald showed that he has a deeper disdain for what made this country pretty great to begin with.

 

[cawacko]

I don't think it's "attacking" the constitution to call out Hillary's people taking the fifth. It was good politics.

 

[Timshel]

I don't think it's "attacking" the constitution to call out Hillary's people taking the fifth. It was good politics.

If you are suggesting that taking the fifth is proof of guilt (and that is what Trump did) then you are attacking the fifth amendment.

It's good politics if you are attempting to attract voters who hate the constitution and the principles that made this country great.