Trump Gets Hard Time From Pornographers Over Anti-Obscenity Pledge

christiefan915

Catalyst
Contributor
"Donald Trump has signed a pledge to crack down on pornography if he's elected president, according to a group that campaigns for the enforcement of federal laws that arguably criminalize distributing images of sexual activity among consenting adults. Porn business owners say they doubt that the thrice-married Republican candidate who once posed for the cover of Playboy magazine actually would bring down the hammer, even if his signature on the document does appear authentic.

Much of the pledge drafted by Enough Is Enough deals with child exploitation. Its aim can be confusing at first, though it does specifically address federal obscenity laws and the possible societal harms of pornography in "whereas" clauses and in the pledge itself. In signing, the group says Trump promised to steer more resources toward prosecutions and to appoint an attorney general who would make enforcement of federal obscenity laws – along with laws against child abuse and child pornography – "a top priority."

"We wanted it to be easy to say yes to and hard to say no to," says Enough Is Enough's president and CEO, Donna Rice Hughes. "This entire sex industry is tied together, so it's like fighting the drug war ... just completely ignoring the obscenity laws [but combating child porn] would be like saying, 'We've got a war on drugs, but we're only going to concentrate on meth and heroin.' That's not going to do a very good job."

Though theoretically possible, pornographers say they aren't concerned about Trump putting them out of business or in jail. "I'm not too worried that the ultimate misogynist Donald Trump would enforce the obscenity laws, as I'm quite sure he has no idea what they are," says Steven Hirsch, founder and co-chairman of Vivid Entertainment, a large pornography company.

Michael Lucas, a self-identified gay conservative and CEO of the gay porn company Lucas Entertainment, is similarly unconcerned. "We hear the same kind of dialogue about porn every time a Republican runs for office, and those puritanical promises are quickly forgotten after the election," he says. "If Trump is actually concerned about protecting Americans from obscenity, he may want to earnestly consider that suggestion to delete his Twitter account."

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-08-01/trump-gets-hard-time-from-pornographers-over-anti-obscenity-pledge



 
Wasn't one of his delegates busted for child porn?

Didn't he pal around with Epstein, who ran the Lolita Express?
 
"Donald Trump has signed a pledge to crack down on pornography if he's elected president, according to a group that campaigns for the enforcement of federal laws that arguably criminalize distributing images of sexual activity among consenting adults. Porn business owners say they doubt that the thrice-married Republican candidate who once posed for the cover of Playboy magazine actually would bring down the hammer, even if his signature on the document does appear authentic.

Much of the pledge drafted by Enough Is Enough deals with child exploitation. Its aim can be confusing at first, though it does specifically address federal obscenity laws and the possible societal harms of pornography in "whereas" clauses and in the pledge itself. In signing, the group says Trump promised to steer more resources toward prosecutions and to appoint an attorney general who would make enforcement of federal obscenity laws – along with laws against child abuse and child pornography – "a top priority."

"We wanted it to be easy to say yes to and hard to say no to," says Enough Is Enough's president and CEO, Donna Rice Hughes. "This entire sex industry is tied together, so it's like fighting the drug war ... just completely ignoring the obscenity laws [but combating child porn] would be like saying, 'We've got a war on drugs, but we're only going to concentrate on meth and heroin.' That's not going to do a very good job."

Though theoretically possible, pornographers say they aren't concerned about Trump putting them out of business or in jail. "I'm not too worried that the ultimate misogynist Donald Trump would enforce the obscenity laws, as I'm quite sure he has no idea what they are," says Steven Hirsch, founder and co-chairman of Vivid Entertainment, a large pornography company.

Michael Lucas, a self-identified gay conservative and CEO of the gay porn company Lucas Entertainment, is similarly unconcerned. "We hear the same kind of dialogue about porn every time a Republican runs for office, and those puritanical promises are quickly forgotten after the election," he says. "If Trump is actually concerned about protecting Americans from obscenity, he may want to earnestly consider that suggestion to delete his Twitter account."

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-08-01/trump-gets-hard-time-from-pornographers-over-anti-obscenity-pledge




Is there some kind of point to this post ?

If Hillary made the same pledge, wouldn't the same thing happen....or would the sex industry just roll over for her....??
 
i guess pornographers really want to branch out into child pornography. I really dont get the appeal of it myself but libs seem to like it a lot.
 
They do seem to be giving her plenty of money, Officer.

Thanks to Citizens United?

Citizens United had nothing to do with paying for speeches or donating to the Clinton Foundation.....if anything the speech scam and the charity scam were created to get around the restrictions that CU said were unconstitutional.....

and Citizen's United was about campaign contributions......as the Clinton Cash video shows, the money Bill and Hillary took in were outright bribes, not campaign contributions....
 
It will be a cold day in hell before I believe anything put out by Breitbart. But it's good to know you're so drenched in the kool-aid you'll believe the most outlandish claims without verifying them first.

Breitbart News' Stephen K. Bannon and Republican activist and strategist Peter Schweizer have turned Schweizer’s error-ridden book Clinton Cash into a movie in order to "engage voters" and attack Hillary Clinton.

"But while polls suggest Trump and Sanders will have a hard time stopping [Clinton], the team behind Clinton Cash—[Peter] Schweizer and Stephen K. Bannon, the executive chairman of Breitbart News—haven’t given up. They’ve turned Clinton Cash into a movie, directed by M.A. Taylor, that will premiere next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors).

As the trailer below indicates, the Clinton Cash movie is less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons[.]
“It’s a story that resonated with people on the printed page,” said Schweizer. “We felt we needed to look at other platforms, too. The key is to engage voters. If you look at what’s motivating Trump and Sanders fans, it’s disgust with cronyism and corruption in Washington.”


Republican Activist And Serial Misinformer Peter Schweizer Is Releasing A New Anti-Clinton Book
Schweizer's Russian Uranium Conspiracy "Is Based On Little Evidence"
At Least Five Errors Undermine Schweizer's Haiti Conspiracy

Schweizer Butchered Two Quotes To Attack Bill Clinton Over HIV/AIDS Programs
Key Evidence Schweizer Used For His Conspiracy About Hillary Clinton And India Is "False"
Schweizer Admitted He Omitted Key Information About Clinton Foundation Donor

Schweizer's Boeing Accusation Has "No Evidence"

Schweizer's Colombia Conspiracy Is "Inconsistent With The Facts"
Schweizer's Iran Accusation Is Undermined By Government 101

Schweizer Misled Readers About Bill Clinton's Charitable Donation

Schweizer's Sloppy Journalism On Ethiopian Aid
Schweizer Attacked Clintons For Accepting Donation From Businessman -- But Not Former Boss George W. Bush

Schweizer Criticized Bill Clinton For Meeting With Kazakhstan President -- But Didn't Attack Bush And Cheney For Friendship With Him

Schweizer Attacked Clintons For Associating With Rwanda President -- But Spares Former Boss President Bush On "Friendship"
Facts Sink Schweizer's FDIC Conspiracy

Schweizer Fell For A Fake Press Release

Facts Undermine Schweizer's Anheuser-Busch Influence Trading Suggestion
After ABC News Found Book Errors, Schweizer Admitted Mistakes



Trump for Institutionalization 2016
 
i guess pornographers really want to branch out into child pornography. I really dont get the appeal of it myself but libs seem to like it a lot.

Post 8


You banned me for mentioning the word remember grind



now what
 
i guess pornographers really want to branch out into child pornography. I really dont get the appeal of it myself but libs seem to like it a lot.

It's a mystery why cons are always drawn to pedo comments, no matter how often they're warned or banned for them.
 
Back
Top