Trump cancels plans to send federal troops to San Francisco for immigration crackdown

Hey stupid. Go look at the link. I copied and pasted from there.

So your answer should have been "no".

Whose argument do you suppose this reinforces?

Also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of]) [form of])"

It appears to me that you are attempting to use a non sequitur to derail my point that your justification for your surmise that the POTUS was likely to accept bribes because he is a felon.

Therefore, logically, I believe it was a non sequitur (also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of]) for you to present such a flimsy argument.
 
Back
Top