http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/r...ed-cnn-town-hall-questions-with-clinton-camp/
DOes this mean media is biased?
DOes this mean media is biased?
Town hall questions given to hillary before event
- Thread starter tsuke
- Start date
real emails
You're sure?
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/r...ed-cnn-town-hall-questions-with-clinton-camp/
DOes this mean media is biased?
Biased?......bullshit.....what it means is total corruption of the media by a totally corrupted government run by a totally corrupt Democrat Party and a mostly ignorant, ill informed, citizenry
thats keeps them in power.
evince
Truthmatters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Caller
Disputed prostitution allegations[edit]
In March 2013 The Daily Caller posted interviews with two women claiming that New Jersey Democratic Senator Bob Menendez had paid them for sex while he was a guest of a campaign donor.[28] The allegation came five days before the 2012 New Jersey senate election. News organizations such as ABC News, which had also interviewed the women, the New York Times, and the New York Post declined to publish the allegations, viewing them as unsubstantiated and lacking credibility.[29][30][31] Subsequently, one of the women who accused Menendez stated that she had been paid to falsely implicate the senator and had never met him.[29][32] Menendez's office described the allegations as "manufactured" by a right-wing blog as a politically motivated smear.[33]
A few weeks later, police in the Dominican Republic announced that three women had claimed they were paid $300–425 each to lie about having had sex with Menendez.[34] Dominican law enforcement also alleged that the women had been paid to lie about Menendez by an individual claiming to work for the Daily Caller. The Daily Caller denied this allegation, stating: "At no point did any money change hands between The Daily Caller and any sources or individuals connected with this investigation".[35] Describing what it saw as the unraveling of the Daily Caller's "scoop", the Poynter Institute wrote: "The Caller stands by its reports, though apparently doesn't feel the need to prove its allegations right".[36]
Fox News controversy[edit]
In March 2015 Daily Caller columnist Mickey Kaus quit after editor Tucker Carlson refused to run a column critical of Fox News coverage of the immigration policy debate.[37] Carlson, who also works for Fox, reportedly did not want the Caller publishing criticism of a firm that employed him.[38] Journalist Neil Munro quit two weeks later.[39]
Disputed prostitution allegations[edit]
In March 2013 The Daily Caller posted interviews with two women claiming that New Jersey Democratic Senator Bob Menendez had paid them for sex while he was a guest of a campaign donor.[28] The allegation came five days before the 2012 New Jersey senate election. News organizations such as ABC News, which had also interviewed the women, the New York Times, and the New York Post declined to publish the allegations, viewing them as unsubstantiated and lacking credibility.[29][30][31] Subsequently, one of the women who accused Menendez stated that she had been paid to falsely implicate the senator and had never met him.[29][32] Menendez's office described the allegations as "manufactured" by a right-wing blog as a politically motivated smear.[33]
A few weeks later, police in the Dominican Republic announced that three women had claimed they were paid $300–425 each to lie about having had sex with Menendez.[34] Dominican law enforcement also alleged that the women had been paid to lie about Menendez by an individual claiming to work for the Daily Caller. The Daily Caller denied this allegation, stating: "At no point did any money change hands between The Daily Caller and any sources or individuals connected with this investigation".[35] Describing what it saw as the unraveling of the Daily Caller's "scoop", the Poynter Institute wrote: "The Caller stands by its reports, though apparently doesn't feel the need to prove its allegations right".[36]
Fox News controversy[edit]
In March 2015 Daily Caller columnist Mickey Kaus quit after editor Tucker Carlson refused to run a column critical of Fox News coverage of the immigration policy debate.[37] Carlson, who also works for Fox, reportedly did not want the Caller publishing criticism of a firm that employed him.[38] Journalist Neil Munro quit two weeks later.[39]
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
Dumb cunt
SmarterthanYou
rebel
normally i'd ask a person for their list of what they consider reliable, but you continue using USSC links, so you're opinion of reliable is worse than the rest of them.