Top 10 Things Rick Perry Doesn't Want You to Know About Him

poet

Banned
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/10/241830/top-10-thing-texas-gov-rick-perry/


With widespread discontent on the right over their current presidential field, all eyes are trained on a likely new entrant: Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R).

Perry, who has been elected governor three times and served for more than 10 years, enjoys bona fides from social conservatives and Tea Party-types alike. Glenn Beck even described Perry as a man he was so enamored with that he wanted to “French kiss.”

However, as conservatives fawn over their newest presidential hopeful, it’s worth taking a closer examination at his record as governor. On issues across the board, from Perry’s support for dropping out of Social Security and Medicaid to his state’s abysmal pollution levels and his proposal that Texas secede from the United States, the Republican governor has amassed a record of far-right extremism.

ThinkProgress has assembled the top ten hits from Perry’s tenure as governor:

(1) PERRY ALLOWED THE EXECUTION OF A LIKELY INNOCENT MAN, THEN IMPEDED AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE MATTER: In 2004, Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in Huntsville, Texas after being convicted of arson and the murder of his three children. Even after significant evidence emerged showing that arson had not caused the fire (thus exonerating Willingham), Perry refused to grant a stay of execution. Five years after Willingham was executed, a report from a Texas Forensic Science Commission investigator found that the fire could not have been arson. As the commission prepared to hear testimony from the investigator in October 2009, Perry quickly fired and replaced three of its members, forcing an indefinite delay in the hearing.

(2) PERRY WANTS TO REPEAL THE 16th AND 17th AMENDMENTS, ENDING DIRECT ELECTION OF U.S. SENATORS AND THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX: In his 2010 book Fed Up!, Perry called the 16th and 17th Amendments “mistaken” and said they resulted from “a fit of populist rage.” The 16th Amendment allows the federal government to collect income taxes, which is the single biggest source of revenue, accounting for 45 percent of all receipts. The 17th Amendment took electing U.S. senators out of the hands of political insiders and allowed the American public to decide their representation instead. If Perry had his way, the federal government would be stripped of its current ability to fund highway construction projects, food inspectors, and the military, and the American public would not even be permitted to elect their own senators.

(3) PERRY PROPOSED LETTING STATES DROP OUT OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICAID: Despite the programs’ importance and popularity, Perry has argued that states like Texas should be allowed to opt out of Social Security and Medicaid. Were Perry to have his way on Social Security, “the entire system would collapse under the weight of too many Social Security beneficiaries who had not paid into the system,” notes Ian Millhiser. On Medicaid, in addition to stripping 3.6 million low-income Texans of their health care, Perry’s proposal would actually hurt, not help, the state’s budget deficit. This is because, as Igor Volsky writes, opting out of Medicaid would take “billions out of the state economy that goes on to support hospitals and other providers,” while forcing hospitals “to swallow the costs of caring for uninsured individuals who will continue to use the emergency room as their primary source of care.”

(4) TEXAS IS THE COUNTRY’S BIGGEST POLLUTER, BUT PERRY SUED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR DISAPPROVING OF THE STATE’S AIR QUALITY STANDARDS: Texas is the biggest polluter in the country, leading the nation in carbon dioxide emissions. However, when the EPA published its “disapproval” of the state’s air quality standards for falling short of the Clean Air Act’s requirements, Perry sued the federal government to challenge the ruling. Perry’s environmental record doesn’t end there. He is a global warming denier who called the 2010 BP oil spill an “act of God” while speaking at a trade association funded by BP.

(5) PERRY DESIGNATED AS “EMERGENCY LEGISLATION” A BILL REQUIRING ALL WOMEN SEEKING ABORTIONS TO HAVE SONOGRAMS FIRST: In January, Perry proposed requiring all women seeking abortions to have a sonogram at least 24 hours before the procedure. Under the bill, doctors would be required to “tell a woman the size of her fetus’ limbs and organs, even if she does not want to know.” Before a woman is permitted to have an abortion, physicians are also forced to provide an image of the fetus and make the woman listen to the sound of its heartbeat. Perry designated his proposal as “emergency legislation,” allowing the bill to be rushed through the legislature. He signed it into law last month.


(6) PERRY GUTTED CHILDCARE SERVICES EVEN AS TEXAS CHILDHOOD POVERTY HIT 25 PERCENT: Facing a $27 billion budget deficit this year, Perry decided to gut child support services, despite a report from the Center for Public Policy Priorities that found nearly one in four Texas children lived beneath the poverty line. Instead of raising revenue like California, a state facing a similarly sized deficit, Perry scaled back more than $10 billion of child support over two years. As Think Progress’ Pat Garofalo noted, these cuts were proposed despite Texas’ possession of a $8.2 billion rainy day fund.

(7) PERRY WAS A STRONG SUPPORTER OF TEXAS’S ANTI-SODOMY LAWS: Perry was a strong proponent of Texas’s anti-sodomy law that was struck down in 2003 by the Supreme Court in Lawrence v. Texas. Calling the law “appropriate,” Perry dismissed the Court decision as the result of “nine oligarchs in robes.” Even after being struck down, Perry supported the Texas legislature’s refusal to remove the law from its books.

(8) PERRY IS A STIMULUS HYPOCRITE WHO LOUDLY CRITICIZED FEDERAL RECOVERY MONEY BUT USED IT TO BALANCE HIS STATE’S BUDGET: As the nation struggled to avoid economic collapse in 2009, Perry was a vocal critic of Congress’s recovery package, even advocating that Texas reject the money because “we can take care of ourselves.” Months later, after Perry was able to balance the state’s budget only with the aid of billions in federal stimulus dollars, Perry again repeated that he would reject federal funding, arguing that the government “spends money they don’t have.” Five months later, Perry again took advantage of federal funding to issue $2 billion in bonds for highway improvements in Texas. Even so, the state faces a $27 billion budget deficit.

(9) PERRY SAID THAT TEXAS MIGHT HAVE TO SECEDE FROM THE UNITED STATES: One hundred and fifty years ago, Texas and other southern states seceded from the Union, resulting in a bloody Civil War. 148 years later, Perry floated the idea that Texas may again have to secede because of a federal government that “continues to thumb their nose at the American people.” Perry was roundly criticized for his proposal, yet he repeated his threat the next month on Fox News, telling host Neil Cavuto, “If Washington continues to force these programs on the states, if Washington continues to disregard the tenth amendment, who knows what happens.”

(10) DESPITE HAVING THE WORST UNINSURED RATE IN THE COUNTRY, PERRY CLAIMS THAT TEXAS HAS “THE BEST HEALTH CARE IN THE COUNTRY” : On Bill Bennett’s radio show last year, Perry claimed that “Texas has the best health care in the country.” In reality, Texas has the highest rate of uninsured residents of any state. More than one in four Texans lack coverage; the national average is just 15.4 percent. As such, there are more uninsured residents in Texas than there are people in 33 states. Despite Texas’s low coverage rates, the state has some of the most restrictive Medicaid eligibility thresholds, and Perry has even proposed dropping out of the program. Texas also has an inordinately high percentage of impoverished children, yet Perry opposed expanding the successful State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).

ThinkProgress intern Sean Savett contributed to this report.

Unfortunately, The GOP and "the truth" have never occupied the same space- poet.
 
1. Disagree. The death penalty is wrong regardless of guilt.
2. Agree. Both go against the founders intent. While they were legit changes as amendments I still believe them wrong.
3. Agree. States and people should be allowed to opt out of those programs.
4. Meh. Not enough to make a damn difference.
5. Don't care one way or the other.
6. Cali is still facing economic hardship and increases in poverty despite that so its irrelevent.
7. Disagree. He can literally go fuck himself here.
8. And? Hypocricy is rampent in every elected official. Not ideal but if you want to play that card I can throw about a dozen back at Obama.
9. Their right. They entered a contract with the states and can withdraw from it if they deem necessary.
10. Their insured rate is irrelevent compared to the level of care.
 
(2) PERRY WANTS TO REPEAL THE 16th AND 17th AMENDMENTS, ENDING DIRECT ELECTION OF U.S. SENATORS AND THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX: In his 2010 book Fed Up!, Perry called the 16th and 17th Amendments “mistaken” and said they resulted from “a fit of populist rage.” The 16th Amendment allows the federal government to collect income taxes, which is the single biggest source of revenue, accounting for 45 percent of all receipts. The 17th Amendment took electing U.S. senators out of the hands of political insiders and allowed the American public to decide their representation instead. If Perry had his way, the federal government would be stripped of its current ability to fund highway construction projects, food inspectors, and the military, and the American public would not even be permitted to elect their own senators.

As I understand it, Rick Perry is a supporter of the Fair Tax Act. That would turn us from an income tax based system to a consumption based system. It would remove the IRS, but would not strip the US "...of its current ability to fund highway construction projects, food inspectors, and the military,".
 
1. Disagree. The death penalty is wrong regardless of guilt.
2. Agree. Both go against the founders intent. While they were legit changes as amendments I still believe them wrong.
3. Agree. States and people should be allowed to opt out of those programs.
4. Meh. Not enough to make a damn difference.
5. Don't care one way or the other.
6. Cali is still facing economic hardship and increases in poverty despite that so its irrelevent.
7. Disagree. He can literally go fuck himself here.
8. And? Hypocricy is rampent in every elected official. Not ideal but if you want to play that card I can throw about a dozen back at Obama.
9. Their right. They entered a contract with the states and can withdraw from it if they deem necessary.
10. Their insured rate is irrelevent compared to the level of care.

1. Some people forfeit their right to be on Earth. Sorry.
2. Disagree. We decided to form " a more perfect union". Can't do that with folks opting out.
3. Outrageous.
4. Damn straight. Fine them to the max.
5. Government intrusion
6. Lock the SOB up.
7. Get out of my fucking bedroom
8. Fuck that shit...Obama isn't the topic of the discussion
9. Fuck that. Find the Texans who agree with that mentally ill SOB.
10. 50/50
 
1. Some people forfeit their right to be on Earth. Sorry.
So you are of the position that the government gets to decide who lives and who dies?
2. Disagree. We decided to form " a more perfect union". Can't do that with folks opting out.
Not related to #2.
3. Outrageous.
Lovely refutation
4. Damn straight. Fine them to the max.
Don't care, lots of government regs with regards to pollution are ridiculous and unnecessary.
5. Government intrusion
Don't care one way or the other on abortion, so I don't care here either.
6. Lock the SOB up.
Yeah for doing his legally obliged job as elected by the people. Clearly a criminal offense.
7. Get out of my fucking bedroom
Agreed.
8. Fuck that shit...Obama isn't the topic of the discussion
He is if it's during an election. And what the fuck would you know, it IS during and about an election. Damned crazy coincidence there.
9. Fuck that. Find the Texans who agree with that mentally ill SOB.
Not my job. That's his. He'd have to have a majority support to secede. But it's their legal right to do so.
10. 50/50
The level of care provided is not dependent on how many are insured or otherwise.
 
So you are of the position that the government gets to decide who lives and who dies?
Not related to #2.
Lovely refutation
Don't care, lots of government regs with regards to pollution are ridiculous and unnecessary.
Don't care one way or the other on abortion, so I don't care here either.
Yeah for doing his legally obliged job as elected by the people. Clearly a criminal offense.
Agreed.
He is if it's during an election. And what the fuck would you know, it IS during and about an election. Damned crazy coincidence there.
Not my job. That's his. He'd have to have a majority support to secede. But it's their legal right to do so.
The level of care provided is not dependent on how many are insured or otherwise.

How can I put this , so that you will understand it. Fuck you, in all your orifices. Stupid bitch. I didn't ask you your opinion.
 
Fuck off. I don't break for cats.

All that supposed education and intelligence and this is your reply. My mistake for thinking you had something of worth to add to this discussion, which ironically you started. It seems you are unable to keep up, despite your valiant efforts otherwise. I really can't blame you though, I too would quit when my positions are no longer capable of being defended.
 
All that supposed education and intelligence and this is your reply. My mistake for thinking you had something of worth to add to this discussion, which ironically you started. It seems you are unable to keep up, despite your valiant efforts otherwise. I really can't blame you though, I too would quit when my positions are no longer capable of being defended.

Listen, I don't feel that I have to defend myself, my education, my intelligence, my sexuality, my race, or anything else about me, to anyone, less to someone who identifies as "President Mittens", and has a cat for an avatar.
And, indeed, this is the thread that I started but I hardly suspected it would be invaded by cretins and Neanderthals, who know more about appearing "stupid", than they do about politics.

This was our exchange/your response to my post:


Originally Posted by poet
1. Some people forfeit their right to be on Earth. Sorry.
So you are of the position that the government gets to decide who lives and who dies?

Capital punishment is the law of the land in many states. If DNA evidence says you did the deed, then, if heinous enough, you die. It's no longer a question of the government but the will of the people. Moron.
2. Disagree. We decided to form " a more perfect union". Can't do that with folks opting out.
Not related to #2.
I'm fine with the amendments as they stand...I give a shit what Rick Perry thinks or wants.
3. Outrageous.
Lovely refutation

Letting states drop out of SS and Medicare/Medicaid , why????????? It's taken out of one's income. It's federally instituted and administered. Non-negotiable. And fuck you.
4. Damn straight. Fine them to the max.
Don't care, lots of government regs with regards to pollution are ridiculous and unnecessary.

Spoken like a typical conservative/Republican, caring nothing about the environment, the air we breathe or the water we drink.
Why? For business' sake? For profits? Why the fuck wouldn't we need regulations concerning pollution? You're on the fucking side of the polluters. Fuck you.

5. Government intrusion
Don't care one way or the other on abortion, so I don't care here either. '
So STFU
6. Lock the SOB up.
Yeah for doing his legally obliged job as elected by the people. Clearly a criminal offense.

I didn't vote for his sorry ass. Again, mixed and fucked up priorities. Pro oil, anti-people, anti-children. But he's supposed to be a Christian, right? Hypocrite of the first magnitude.
7. Get out of my fucking bedroom
Agreed.
I didn't ask you to fucking agree with me. I don't fucking care what you think.
8. Fuck that shit...Obama isn't the topic of the discussion
He is if it's during an election. And what the fuck would you know, it IS during and about an election. Damned crazy coincidence there.

The topic is Rick Perry. You want to discuss Barack Obama, start a thread. He has to win the nomination of his party before it becomes about Barack Obama, dumb dora.

9. Fuck that. Find the Texans who agree with that mentally ill SOB.
Not my job. That's his. He'd have to have a majority support to secede. But it's their legal right to do so.

The last Civil War proved that it wasn't the right of a state to secede. That will never happen again. Stupid.

10. 50/50
The level of care provided is not dependent on how many are insured or otherwise.

What the fuck do you know about the healthcare industry. I worked both for a provider and for a biller for private insurance. And your statement, irrelevant as it is, means squat.
 
Fuck off. I don't break for cats.


Blowit hates stupid people, ergo he must hate himself.



He doesn't know the difference between "break" and "brake", apparently.



What a wordsmith.



 
Blowit hates stupid people, ergo he must hate himself.



He doesn't know the difference between "break" and "brake", apparently.



What a wordsmith.

"Break", as in make allowances for, or "take time out for". I know what I meant and I know the difference between "brake" and "break". You're not the one to correct a wordsmith. Hence, why your ass is on ignore. Peasant.
 
"Break", as in make allowances for, or "take time out for". I know what I meant and I know the difference between "brake" and "break". You're not the one to correct a wordsmith. Hence, why your ass is on ignore. Peasant.



Your lying is as poor as your jiving, blowit.


2005121402_Display-25.gif
 
Your lying is as poor as your jiving, blowit.


2005121402_Display-25.gif

"Jiving"????? Couldn't resist the racial slur, could you?

I don't "jive". I'm apt to be caught dining on sushi and listening to Bach or Beethoven, as "jiving". Leave it up to stupid , arrogant white people to come up with an indescribable ID, and the obsession for attempting to correct "black people", whom they think , can't make it without them. I'm headed out to pick up my "wordsmith check", as we speak. Shall I post a photo copy, for your edification?
 
Poor blowit.


Exposed as an imbecile who doesn't know the difference between "break" and "brake", he lies about it and plays the race card.
 
Poor blowit.


Exposed as an imbecile who doesn't know the difference between "break" and "brake", he lies about it and plays the race card.


More white privilege from the undeserving. Not only will they tell you what you meant, but they'll insult your intelligence by suggesting that you don't know what you're talking about.
Race didn't even enter into it, until you added "jiving", which was "coined" from the BeBop Era, by black jazz musicians, hence, the racial slur, hence the race card being played by none other than you.
I can't play a card, that I've worn on my skin since birth. Complete idiot. Owned.
 
As I understand it, Rick Perry is a supporter of the Fair Tax Act. That would turn us from an income tax based system to a consumption based system. It would remove the IRS, but would not strip the US "...of its current ability to fund highway construction projects, food inspectors, and the military,".

How many times do we have to go through this. The Fair tax is just another regresive scheme to dump the burden of taxation on the middle and upper middle classes. Please, lets just not have another fruitless discussion about that utter piece of non-sense. It's never ever going to happen cause the American public just isn't that stupid.
 
How many times do we have to go through this. The Fair tax is just another regresive scheme to dump the burden of taxation on the middle and upper middle classes. Please, lets just not have another fruitless discussion about that utter piece of non-sense. It's never ever going to happen cause the American public just isn't that stupid.

Mott, before you go off, try and determine if anything in the post discusses whether or not the Fair Tax act is good or bad. I was simply explaining to our young poet that closing the IRS does not necessarily mean closing all income for the federal gov't.

Relax, my friend, we can argue about that tax another time.
 
Mott, before you go off, try and determine if anything in the post discusses whether or not the Fair Tax act is good or bad. I was simply explaining to our young poet that closing the IRS does not necessarily mean closing all income for the federal gov't.

Relax, my friend, we can argue about that tax another time.

Why did you feel that you needed to explain the obvious? And I am under no illusions. 58 years of age is hardly "young"...and I'm not 'our poet".
 
Why did you feel that you needed to explain the obvious? And I am under no illusions. 58 years of age is hardly "young"...and I'm not 'our poet".

When, in your original post, you wrote "If Perry had his way, the federal government would be stripped of its current ability to fund highway construction projects, food inspectors, and the military...", it was not obvious that you knew this.

As for the rest, call it poetic licence. :)
 
Back
Top