Too Much Knowledge A Dangerous Thing in Florida

martin

Well-known member
In targeting how public schools teach about race, some Republican lawmakers seem determined to downplay or ignore the tribulations suffered by Black Americans throughout our nation’s history. Why?

Is it because they fear that by acquiring such information, the next generation of White Americans might gain a fuller understanding of why racial equality has yet to be achieved, as well as why remedies such as affirmative action and reparations for descendants of enslaved people are not so unreasonable?

As a conservative on most issues, I seldom agree with much of what Vice President Harris says. But when she traveled to Florida last week to criticize the state’s new education guidelines on race, I found myself nodding along. “Let us not be seduced into believing that somehow we will be better if we forget,” she said. “We will be better if we remember. We will be stronger if we remember.”

In targeting how public schools teach about race, some Republican lawmakers seem determined to downplay or ignore the tribulations suffered by Black Americans throughout our nation’s history. Why?

Is it because they fear that by acquiring such information, the next generation of White Americans might gain a fuller understanding of why racial equality has yet to be achieved, as well as why remedies such as affirmative action and reparations for descendants of enslaved people are not so unreasonable?

As a conservative on most issues, I seldom agree with much of what Vice President Harris says. But when she traveled to Florida last week to criticize the state’s new education guidelines on race, I found myself nodding along. “Let us not be seduced into believing that somehow we will be better if we forget,” she said. “We will be better if we remember. We will be stronger if we remember.”

In response to his critics, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) tweeted, “Democrats like Kamala Harris have to lie about Florida’s educational standards to cover for their agenda of indoctrinating students and pushing sexual topics onto children.” If Harris was lying, DeSantis avoided detailing how.

Particularly outrageous within the Florida curriculum are standards that suggest there was some benefit to slavery. Guidelines include instruction on “how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.” I thought the absurd “slavery was actually good for them” chestnut had been abandoned long ago. Apparently not.

I’m bewildered about why some on the right think too much knowledge is a dangerous thing, a fear demonstrated not only by restricting teaching about race but also through challenging or outright banning books in school and public libraries on any variety of topics, including many literary classics. While it’s true that the left too often wants to turn schools into laboratories for progressive ideology, expanding thoughts and ideas is always preferable to restricting them — something progressives should remember when they suggest clamping down on conservative voices on social media or barring right-leaning speakers from speaking on college campuses.

Rather than banning reading material advocated by the left, the right should insist on adding more books promoting conservative viewpoints. If that means building bigger libraries to accommodate the widest array of philosophies and opinions, everybody wins.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/25/harris-desantis-florida-guidelines-teaching-race/
 
First of all, nobody ever said slavery was good for them, that is a lie being pushed by democrats like Harris.

Secondly, many did develop skills that helped them to survive during reconstruction, especially in regards to farming where some got their own land.

Also, nobody is trying to cover up slavery, there is no push in Florida to remove the topic from textbooks or on how it is taught and frankly it's not something that can ever be erased from our history.

It is around us every day.

Kids are aware of it long before a school teaches them about it.

It is not the right trying to rewrite history it is the left who are by ignoring certain facts about slavery instead of teaching the full impacts of it.

Positives and negatives.

They want to indoctrinate children with only their view of it so the kids grow up with only one viewpoint which is theirs.
 
First of all, nobody ever said slavery was good for them, that is a lie being pushed by democrats like Harris.

But it does seem to try to soften the negative aspects of it.

Secondly, many did develop skills that helped them to survive during reconstruction, especially in regards to farming where some got their own land.

^^^^like that! Let's see; the Southern plantation owners brutally beat them, tore their families to shreds, didn't even THINK to treat them as human but used their labor. Should the descendants of the slaves write thank you notes to the tormentors? I'm sure even the hostages in Iran back in 1979 learned some valuable Arabic phrases they can use nicely today! Or how about the Rwandans who were slaughtered back in the 90's...I bet the survivors learned a lot about machetes that they can use today to chop down trees and stuff!

Also, nobody is trying to cover up slavery, there is no push in Florida to remove the topic from textbooks or on how it is taught and frankly it's not something that can ever be erased from our history.

There is literally NO REASON to try to "highlight" the "benefits" of slavery except to downplay it's negative impacts.

It is not the right trying to rewrite history it is the left who are by ignoring certain facts about slavery instead of teaching the full impacts of it.

Positives and negatives.

Except these positives were NOT part of the plan. No, the white slavers were only interested in human chattel to do physical labor until they died. There was literally ZERO interest in setting them up to survive in a post-slavery world. That's the silliness of this argument.

They want to indoctrinate children with only their view of it so the kids grow up with only one viewpoint which is theirs.

You mean indoctrinate them into knowing that slavery really doesn't have any good aspects to it, no matter how it is "spun"?
 
In targeting how public schools teach about race, some Republican lawmakers seem determined to downplay or ignore the tribulations suffered by Black Americans throughout our nation’s history. Why?

Is it because they fear that by acquiring such information, the next generation of White Americans might gain a fuller understanding of why racial equality has yet to be achieved, as well as why remedies such as affirmative action and reparations for descendants of enslaved people are not so unreasonable?

As a conservative on most issues, I seldom agree with much of what Vice President Harris says. But when she traveled to Florida last week to criticize the state’s new education guidelines on race, I found myself nodding along. “Let us not be seduced into believing that somehow we will be better if we forget,” she said. “We will be better if we remember. We will be stronger if we remember.”

In targeting how public schools teach about race, some Republican lawmakers seem determined to downplay or ignore the tribulations suffered by Black Americans throughout our nation’s history. Why?

Is it because they fear that by acquiring such information, the next generation of White Americans might gain a fuller understanding of why racial equality has yet to be achieved, as well as why remedies such as affirmative action and reparations for descendants of enslaved people are not so unreasonable?

As a conservative on most issues, I seldom agree with much of what Vice President Harris says. But when she traveled to Florida last week to criticize the state’s new education guidelines on race, I found myself nodding along. “Let us not be seduced into believing that somehow we will be better if we forget,” she said. “We will be better if we remember. We will be stronger if we remember.”

In response to his critics, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) tweeted, “Democrats like Kamala Harris have to lie about Florida’s educational standards to cover for their agenda of indoctrinating students and pushing sexual topics onto children.” If Harris was lying, DeSantis avoided detailing how.

Particularly outrageous within the Florida curriculum are standards that suggest there was some benefit to slavery. Guidelines include instruction on “how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.” I thought the absurd “slavery was actually good for them” chestnut had been abandoned long ago. Apparently not.

I’m bewildered about why some on the right think too much knowledge is a dangerous thing, a fear demonstrated not only by restricting teaching about race but also through challenging or outright banning books in school and public libraries on any variety of topics, including many literary classics. While it’s true that the left too often wants to turn schools into laboratories for progressive ideology, expanding thoughts and ideas is always preferable to restricting them — something progressives should remember when they suggest clamping down on conservative voices on social media or barring right-leaning speakers from speaking on college campuses.

Rather than banning reading material advocated by the left, the right should insist on adding more books promoting conservative viewpoints. If that means building bigger libraries to accommodate the widest array of philosophies and opinions, everybody wins.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/25/harris-desantis-florida-guidelines-teaching-race/


They need to teach who voted against the 13th and 14th and 15th and 19th amendments. They need to teach who started the KKK and gave us Jim Crow laws. They need to teach what party the Slave owners were so the kids will know that the Democr4ats are the racist party
 
They need to teach who voted against the 13th and 14th and 15th and 19th amendments. They need to teach who started the KKK and gave us Jim Crow laws. They need to teach what party the Slave owners were so the kids will know that the Democr4ats are the racist party

You weren’t taught much about it, obviously.
 
In targeting how public schools teach about race, some Republican lawmakers seem determined to downplay or ignore the tribulations suffered by Black Americans throughout our nation’s history. Why?

Is it because they fear that by acquiring such information, the next generation of White Americans might gain a fuller understanding of why racial equality has yet to be achieved, as well as why remedies such as affirmative action and reparations for descendants of enslaved people are not so unreasonable?

As a conservative on most issues, I seldom agree with much of what Vice President Harris says. But when she traveled to Florida last week to criticize the state’s new education guidelines on race, I found myself nodding along. “Let us not be seduced into believing that somehow we will be better if we forget,” she said. “We will be better if we remember. We will be stronger if we remember.”

In targeting how public schools teach about race, some Republican lawmakers seem determined to downplay or ignore the tribulations suffered by Black Americans throughout our nation’s history. Why?

Is it because they fear that by acquiring such information, the next generation of White Americans might gain a fuller understanding of why racial equality has yet to be achieved, as well as why remedies such as affirmative action and reparations for descendants of enslaved people are not so unreasonable?

As a conservative on most issues, I seldom agree with much of what Vice President Harris says. But when she traveled to Florida last week to criticize the state’s new education guidelines on race, I found myself nodding along. “Let us not be seduced into believing that somehow we will be better if we forget,” she said. “We will be better if we remember. We will be stronger if we remember.”

In response to his critics, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) tweeted, “Democrats like Kamala Harris have to lie about Florida’s educational standards to cover for their agenda of indoctrinating students and pushing sexual topics onto children.” If Harris was lying, DeSantis avoided detailing how.

Particularly outrageous within the Florida curriculum are standards that suggest there was some benefit to slavery. Guidelines include instruction on “how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.” I thought the absurd “slavery was actually good for them” chestnut had been abandoned long ago. Apparently not.

I’m bewildered about why some on the right think too much knowledge is a dangerous thing, a fear demonstrated not only by restricting teaching about race but also through challenging or outright banning books in school and public libraries on any variety of topics, including many literary classics. While it’s true that the left too often wants to turn schools into laboratories for progressive ideology, expanding thoughts and ideas is always preferable to restricting them — something progressives should remember when they suggest clamping down on conservative voices on social media or barring right-leaning speakers from speaking on college campuses.

Rather than banning reading material advocated by the left, the right should insist on adding more books promoting conservative viewpoints. If that means building bigger libraries to accommodate the widest array of philosophies and opinions, everybody wins.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/25/harris-desantis-florida-guidelines-teaching-race/

False, perverted, and fabricated tales based on blatant racism is not "knowledge."
 
They need to teach who voted against the 13th and 14th and 15th and 19th amendments. They need to teach who started the KKK and gave us Jim Crow laws. They need to teach what party the Slave owners were so the kids will know that the Democr4ats are the racist party

The southern white xtian filth

The democrats kicked those dixiecrat crackas to the curb and now they are the republican party
 
Last edited:
You have no clue what I am talking about and you probably know nothing about those amendments

You, on the other hand, have merely a clue about what you’re talking about. You know the political parties but not what they stood for and that, as guno points out, they have reversed themselves over the last sixty years. It’s amazing how widespread this ignorance is on the Right.
 

Typical half ass.

Democratic dominance in the South was about state and local government, not Presidential elections where national issues moved voters.

The Solid South or the Southern bloc was the electoral voting bloc of the states of the Southern United States for issues that were regarded as particularly important to the interests of Democrats in those states. The Southern bloc existed between the end of the Reconstruction era in 1877 and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. During this period, the Democratic Party overwhelmingly controlled southern state legislatures, and most local, state and federal officeholders in the South were Democras. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, Southern Democrats disenfranchised blacks in all Southern states, along with a few non-Southern states doing the same as well. This resulted essentially in a one-party system, in which a candidate's victory in Democratic primary elections was tantamount to election to the office itself. White primaries were another means that the Democrats used to consolidate their political power, excluding blacks from voting in primaries.[1]





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_South
 
Typical half ass.

Democratic dominance in the South was about state and local government, not Presidential elections where national issues moved voters.

The Solid South or the Southern bloc was the electoral voting bloc of the states of the Southern United States for issues that were regarded as particularly important to the interests of Democrats in those states. The Southern bloc existed between the end of the Reconstruction era in 1877 and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. During this period, the Democratic Party overwhelmingly controlled southern state legislatures, and most local, state and federal officeholders in the South were Democras. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, Southern Democrats disenfranchised blacks in all Southern states, along with a few non-Southern states doing the same as well. This resulted essentially in a one-party system, in which a candidate's victory in Democratic primary elections was tantamount to election to the office itself. White primaries were another means that the Democrats used to consolidate their political power, excluding blacks from voting in primaries.[1]





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_South



Read the link and learn
 
You notice that it is almost always FL they go after not TX? That has to mean something. Michael Yon says Abbott is full blown WEF, fooling the people of TX.
 

The Invasion Continues with Direct Aiding and Abetting by WEF/CCP lieutenant Texas “Governor” Gregg Abbott. Abbott is as corrupt as the Bidens and accepts money from the Operation. Such as $1.4m from William Harris, who is building a Colonia for about 200,000 aliens in Liberty County north of Houston.

Call things, people, and situations, by their proper names.

The invaders are future warriors and slaves of WEF/CCP. Abbott is doing nothing. This is Kayfabe.
 

The Invasion Continues with Direct Aiding and Abetting by WEF/CCP lieutenant Texas “Governor” Gregg Abbott. Abbott is as corrupt as the Bidens and accepts money from the Operation. Such as $1.4m from William Harris, who is building a Colonia for about 200,000 aliens in Liberty County north of Houston.

Call things, people, and situations, by their proper names.

The invaders are future warriors and slaves of WEF/CCP. Abbott is doing nothing. This is Kayfabe.

Complete bullshit. If you know their name they aren't important.
 
Back
Top