Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real

A

anatta

100% recycled karma
The deal also listed “10 Jim” and “10 held by H for the big guy"
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.

“People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity,” the Times writes. “Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.”
 
But wait, it doesn’t end there. In October 2020, the Times cast doubt that there was a meeting between Joe Biden and an official from Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company for which Hunter was a board member. “A Biden campaign spokesman said Mr. Biden’s official schedules did not show a meeting between the two men,” the Times wrote, acting as a perfect stenographer.

Yet in the latest report, published Wednesday night, the Times said the meeting likely did happen. Biden had attended the dinner in question. Funny how this works when you don’t just take someone’s word for it.
see also
Federal prosecutors have looked into Hunter Biden's email exchanges with his former business associates.
Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop confirmed in New York Times report

In the heat of the presidential race of 2020, the Times never missed a chance to cast doubt on the laptop, saying the information was “purported” and quoting a letter from former Democratic officials who claimed — with no evidence — that it was Russian disinformation. As recently as September 2021, the Times called the laptop “unsubstantiated” in a news story.

Why was it unsubstantiated? Because of willful ignorance and the Times’ curious lack of curiosity. Hunter’s business partner Tony Bobulinski came forward immediately after The Post’s reports and confirmed that the emails bearing his name were legitimate. The Bidens didn’t even deny it was true! They just deflected, with the media’s help, saying it was a dirty trick or not a story. Mostly, the press just ignored it.
 
anatta said:
But wait, it doesn’t end there. In October 2020, the Times cast doubt that there was a meeting between Joe Biden and an official from Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company for which Hunter was a board member. “A Biden campaign spokesman said Mr. Biden’s official schedules did not show a meeting between the two men,” the Times wrote, acting as a perfect stenographer.

Yet in the latest report, published Wednesday night, the Times said the meeting likely did happen. Biden had attended the dinner in question. Funny how this works when you don’t just take someone’s word for it.
see also
Federal prosecutors have looked into Hunter Biden's email exchanges with his former business associates.
Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop confirmed in New York Times report

In the heat of the presidential race of 2020, the Times never missed a chance to cast doubt on the laptop, saying the information was “purported” and quoting a letter from former Democratic officials who claimed — with no evidence — that it was Russian disinformation. As recently as September 2021, the Times called the laptop “unsubstantiated” in a news story.

Why was it unsubstantiated? Because of willful ignorance and the Times’ curious lack of curiosity. Hunter’s business partner Tony Bobulinski came forward immediately after The Post’s reports and confirmed that the emails bearing his name were legitimate. The Bidens didn’t even deny it was true! They just deflected, with the media’s help, saying it was a dirty trick or not a story. Mostly, the press just ignored it.
Click to expand...

So fucking what? You realize what you're doing here is giving the Times power...what they say matters eh? I knew they were lying two years ago. They are traitors and deserve to hang but you are playing stupid social media gotcha games.
 
Guille said:
So fucking what? You realize what you're doing here is giving the Times power...what they say matters eh? I knew they were lying two years ago. They are traitors and deserve to hang but you are playing stupid social media gotcha games.
Click to expand...
Everyone knew the emperor had no clothes. Of course you knew and anyone would
-except some never did because Big Tech censored the NYP story on the laptop
All the talking heads went into spin mode, and "50 former intelligence officials" :rolleyes:
called it "Rusian Disinformation". FB blocked the link

It was Big Tech and the media colluding for Biden, by bubbling up "Russian disinformation"
^worth noting even with todays proclivities for trampling over truths
 
AProudLefty said:
We know that Hunter has many laptops. So what exactly does it mean when the NYT "admits" it's real?
Click to expand...
(OP link)
“People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity,” the Times writes. “Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.”
 
anatta said:
(OP link)
“People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity,” the Times writes. “Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.”
Click to expand...

So Hunter did businesses with others? Trump did the same. What of it?
 
anatta said:
Everyone knew the emperor had no clothes. Of course you knew and anyone would
-except some never did because Big Tech censored the NYP story on the laptop
All the talking heads went into spin mode, and "50 former intelligence officials" :rolleyes:
called it "Rusian Disinformation". FB blocked the link

It was Big Tech and the media colluding for Biden, by bubbling up "Russian disinformation"
^worth noting even with todays proclivities for trampling over truths
Click to expand...

Once again, we all knew that. People weren't fooled, the problem is that some people don't care. You're approaching this the wrong way.
 
FKMHZXnXsAM9oIU.jpg
 
AProudLefty said:
So Hunter did businesses with others? Trump did the same. What of it?
Click to expand...
Tony Bobulinski who worked for Hunter said Joe Biden was "the Big Guy" mentioned in Hunter's emails. And Bobulinski had business meetings with Joe Biden. Hunter was selling access to Joe Biden and Joe is therefore involved in corruption. Hunter was accepting $80K 3 carat diamonds from a Chinese business man with direct ties to the CCP. If a man gives another man a 3 carat diamond its for an engagement or a bribe. Hunter was paying several of Joe's bills including a credit card bill. Either Hunter was incredibly nice or it was a way to funnel payoffs to Joe without have to declare the income.
 
ExpressLane said:
Tony Bobulinski who worked for Hunter said Joe Biden was "the Big Guy" mentioned in Hunter's emails. And Bobulinski had business meetings with Joe Biden. Hunter was selling access to Joe Biden and Joe is therefore involved in corruption. Hunter was accepting $80K 3 carat diamonds from a Chinese business man with direct ties to the CCP. If a man gives another man a 3 carat diamond its for an engagement or a bribe. Hunter was paying several of Joe's bills including a credit card bill. Either Hunter was incredibly nice or it was a way to funnel payoffs to Joe without have to declare the income.
Click to expand...

I thought we are not supposed to believe their anecdotes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top