Thoughts on the Republican Convention.

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Its looks very likely that no single Republican candidate will garner a majority of the delegates for the upcoming convention in Cleveland.
So starts a fun and very interesting debate.

Do you think the party is ethically bound to look at the intent of the voters when deciding a candidate, if Trump got the most votes, but not the majority, should they make him the nominee out of respect of those voters? (Trump anyway)

Do you think they are ethically bound to chose from those who at least got some delegates? Or at least give some consideration to the will of the voters by choosing from, say the top three? (Trump, Cruz or (Rubio/Kasich))

Do you think they should not be bound at all and should feel free to chose anyone regardless of votes or if they actually ran? (Anyone, Trump, Cruz, Ryan, Romney, Nute Gingrich, etc.)


Who is your choice given the likely coming scenario? Why?
 
Kasich or Rubio


they will take it form Trump if they possibly can.


many of the delegates are not trump loyal even in the places where they were elected to support him.


the idiot racists trump has taken from the republican party are not respected by the party.


they merely USE these racist assholes
 
evince said:
Kasich or Rubio


they will take it form Trump if they possibly can.


many of the delegates are not trump loyal even in the places where they were elected to support him.


the idiot racists trump has taken from the republican party are not respected by the party.


they merely USE these racist assholes
Click to expand...

I agree that if Trump goes in without the required number for the first ballot, its over for him. I don't know what will happen, it will be very interesting. The Talk Radio crew is hard core for Cruz, but they don't really represent the Republican party or the delegates. Who knows what kind of promises are being made. It would be so cool to be a Republican delegate this year.
 
Jarod said:
Its looks very likely that no single Republican candidate will garner a majority of the delegates for the upcoming convention in Cleveland.
So starts a fun and very interesting debate.

Do you think the party is ethically bound to look at the intent of the voters when deciding a candidate, if Trump got the most votes, but not the majority, should they make him the nominee out of respect of those voters? (Trump anyway)

Do you think they are ethically bound to chose from those who at least got some delegates? Or at least give some consideration to the will of the voters by choosing from, say the top three? (Trump, Cruz or (Rubio/Kasich))

Do you think they should not be bound at all and should feel free to chose anyone regardless of votes or if they actually ran? (Anyone, Trump, Cruz, Ryan, Romney, Nute Gingrich, etc.)


Who is your choice given the likely coming scenario? Why?
Click to expand...

The Republican Party can choose whomever they want to be their nominee. They are no more bound to the voters wishes than the voters are to whom they nominate. I know some want to make big drama out of the situation. But it is what it is. At the end of the day the country is still fucked.

But you have your game of Big Indian Little Indian so you will be distracted while you are getting fucked
 
I Love America said:
The Republican Party can choose whomever they want to be their nominee. They are no more bound to the voters wishes than the voters are to whom they nominate. I know some want to make big drama out of the situation. But it is what it is. At the end of the day the country is still fucked.

But you have your game of Big Indian Little Indian so you will be distracted while you are getting fucked
Click to expand...

I agree they CAN chose who they want. The question is what considerations should they entertain?

I can remember a lot of bellyaching about the Democrats Super delegates and how undemocratic they are.
 
yes they can chose who they want.

hell the can and will change the rules to off trump right in the beginning of the whole convention


what they can not do is get enough American votes to win the election no matter what or who they chose.


your racist base wont get you close enough to elections to win by cheating anymore.


Americans NOW know you cheat in elections


they are watching you TAKE the nomination from the guy with the most votes as we speak.



If you notice you don't hear rebuplicans talk about how the USA is not a Democracy anymore.


that meme started to HURT their stupid asses.

Americans LIKE democracy huh


your fucking lies about it did not destroy that huh.



America is a proud democracy huh assholes



now gulp the tar you dinos that republican party you loved is already fucking dead
 
So ILA, what are your thoughts on what they SHOULD do, not what they CAN do.
 
Trump's New Campaign Song?


trump-trip-wisconsin.png
 
Has anyone seen or heard from Trump since last night? Someone should really check on him.
 
I would have thought you lefties would be more interested in the same questions regarding the donkey convention. That contest is much closer.
 
Legion Troll said:
So do I.

The Democrats don't make a regular habit of claiming to be pro-gun, though, do they?

It seems hypocritical to deny a right you profess to champion at your own gatherings, doesn't it?
Click to expand...

Democrats make it a regular habit to claim that requiring ID prohibits or severely limits participation yet require ID to attend their events.

Seems hypocritical to claim something that prohibits participation is required by those making that claim.
 
Celticguy said:
I would have thought you lefties would be more interested in the same questions regarding the donkey convention. That contest is much closer.
Click to expand...

Will attending the jackass convention require an ID, something the Democrats say having to present in order to prove you are who you say you are prohibits participation?
 
Racist scum1583796 said:
Democrats make it a regular habit to claim that requiring ID prohibits or severely limits participation yet require ID to attend their events.

Seems hypocritical to claim something that prohibits participation is required by those making that claim.
Click to expand...

All voters show ID to register, Always have.
 
CFM said:
Will attending the jackass convention require an ID, something the Democrats say having to present in order to prove you are who you say you are prohibits participation?
Click to expand...

It's not open to the public. Members only. I would imagine credentials are issued and checked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top