Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Thorium, yay or nay?
Thorium, yay or nay?
Start you Coleman Lantern, motherfucker, and suck down the fumes.
India is in the fast lane when it comes to thorium fuelled reactors.
http://m.economictimes.com/news/sci...-former-aec-chairman/articleshow/52489649.cms
Sent from my iPhone 10S
And Grind the genius thinks that is boring.
I was hoping you would post.
What is your opinion of thorium over nuclear, oil, etc.?
He's talking about the thorium mantles they used in those lamps. They've now apparently gone over to using yttrium instead.You obviously don't know what thorium is.
You're excused from this thread.
It would seem to tick pretty much all the boxes. It baffles me why the US and Europe are leaving this mostly to the Indians and Chinese.
Sent from my iPhone 10S
Its mostly regulation and lawsuits i think. Hard to get the permits and clearances for something like this and in a tort happy country its a lawsuit waiting to happen whereas the chinese and indians dont give a shit about their untermenshen.
There is something to that, Bill Gates is getting his prototype 4th gen reactor prototypes in China. I guess we can all blame the likes of Greenpiss, they are the modern equivalent of Luddites.
Sent from my iPhone 10S
Start you Coleman Lantern, motherfucker, and suck down the fumes.
It baffles me why the US and Europe are leaving this mostly to the Indians and Chinese.
Sent from my iPhone 10S
Its mostly regulation and lawsuits i think. Hard to get the permits and clearances for something like this and in a tort happy country its a lawsuit waiting to happen whereas the chinese and indians dont give a shit about their untermenshen.
Excellent article on molten salt reactors fuelled by thorium.
https://www.environmentalleader.com...ions-for-nuclear-energy-in-the-united-states/
Sent from my iPhone 10S
Probably nay. Though certainly safer with less HLW than a U235 reactor you still need massive capitalization, the there are technical issues of the freeze points of the fluoride salts used not to mention you still need fissile material to start the reaction. Given the vast quantities of oil and gas in shale deposits in the US and advances in sustainable power sources I doubt you'll see the capital investment to develop the technology in the US.Thorium, yay or nay?
What regulation? You would need to develop the technology before you could implement appropriate regulations and only an idiot would suggest deregulation of nuclear power given the potential risks and though Thorium reactors would be safer than current U235 reactors they are still far from safe. Hell decommissioning cost of a thorium reactor would be an estimated 300 to 400 million. Significantly less than current reactors but still a crap load of money.Its mostly regulation and lawsuits i think. Hard to get the permits and clearances for something like this and in a tort happy country its a lawsuit waiting to happen whereas the chinese and indians dont give a shit about their untermenshen.
Thorium, yay or nay?
You obviously don't know what thorium is.
You're excused from this thread.