This CIA finding certainly has the right in a tissy

archives

Verified User
all day the cable channels have been swamped with Trump surrogates fighting to reframe the report, everything from shooting the messenger, to questioning the CIA's motivation, I even heard one redescribing events to portray it all as "Obama's fault"

Undeniable fact is that hacking occurred, and that hacking worked to the overwhelming benefit of one candidate, and to blanketly dismiss 17 intelligence agencies findings is inane, but it sure is fun watching them attempt it
 
all day the cable channels have been swamped with Trump surrogates fighting to reframe the report, everything from shooting the messenger, to questioning the CIA's motivation, I even heard one redescribing events to portray it all as "Obama's fault"

Undeniable fact is that hacking occurred, and that hacking worked to the overwhelming benefit of one candidate, and to blanketly dismiss 17 intelligence agencies findings is inane, but it sure is fun watching them attempt it

Not undeniable at all. You and your kind are desperate.
 
Since you're such a fan of hypocrisy isn't it amazing how liberals laughed at Romney for his Russian comments in 2012 are now so concerned about Russia? And how the left has hated the CIA and is now all about their findings?
 
Not undeniable at all. You and your kind are desperate.

So your saying that hacking didn't occur? If hacking didn't occur, where did those WikiLeak disclosures come from? And how were they obtained?

Do you read what you post before you post it?
 
Since you're such a fan of hypocrisy isn't it amazing how liberals laughed at Romney for his Russian comments in 2012 are now so concerned about Russia? And how the left has hated the CIA and is now all about their findings?

I can't argue with this. Last time I was posting here I hated Cawacko but fucking lefty treasonous Prog assholes have destroyed the left, I have nowhere else to go now but the center-right. Good job you treasonous dogs.
 
Since you're such a fan of hypocrisy isn't it amazing how liberals laughed at Romney for his Russian comments in 2012 are now so concerned about Russia? And how the left has hated the CIA and is now all about their findings?

Did I mention Russia in my post at all? or Romney? And where was it stated exactly that the anyone loved Russia and hated the CIA?

Now you got to go back in time to regurgitate generalizations?
 
Did I mention Russia in my post at all? or Romney? And where was it stated exactly that the anyone loved Russia and hated the CIA?

Now you got to go back in time to regurgitate generalizations?

You want hypocrisy called out. I'm doing you a favor here
 
You should take a slow walk past a mirror brother.

If the shoe was on the other foot, you guys would be calling Clinton a traitor.

I'm not defending Trump nor am I denying there's hypocrisy on the right. My man archives like hypocrisy pointed out. I'm doing my part
 
So your saying that hacking didn't occur? If hacking didn't occur, where did those WikiLeak disclosures come from? And how were they obtained?

Do you read what you post before you post it?

according to assange it was a dnc insider.

He didnt mention it but speculation has it that it is seth rich. A DNC programmer who got suicided while jogging.
 
So your saying that hacking didn't occur? If hacking didn't occur, where did those WikiLeak disclosures come from? And how were they obtained?

Do you read what you post before you post it?

Hacking is not necessarily election tampering. If Podesta was dumb enough to use a gmail account then he deserved to be hacked. Debbie Wasserman-Hooknose talked about rigging the nomination on what amounted to an open line. Her fault, her own stupidity. The Russians did not hack the election.
 
Back
Top