This campaign proves Romney's 47% comment in 2012 was TRUE

PostmodernRacistTrumpfPimp said:
in your dreams, blacksmith......
Click to expand...

Trumpf may not be a Democrat in name this year...but you can't deny that he is a New York pro-choice liberal...
He may have said the things he knew he needed to say to get to where he is today in your party, but in your heart you have to know that's not what he really believes.
Poor Pimp
 
Leonthecat said:
Trumpf may not be a Democrat in name this year...but you can't deny that he is a New York pro-choice liberal...
He may have said the things he knew he needed to say to get to where he is today in your party, but in your heart you have to know that's not what he really believes.
Poor Pimp
Click to expand...

in your dreams BucKKKle......
 
Rune said:
They are criminals
Click to expand...

Cite what US codes were broken. Like Giuliani has cited Mrs. Clinton for 18...

Giuliani makes that case that when it comes to laws surrounding handling classified data, intent is irrelevant. "The definition of gross negligence under the law is extreme carelessness," he said. The FBI "clearly found a direct violation of 18 United States code section 793 which does not require intent -- it requires only gross negligence in the handling of anything relating to the national defense."
Click to expand...
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...s_negligence_equals_extreme_carelessness.html
 
Right said:
Cite what US codes were broken. Like Giuliani has cited Mrs. Clinton for 18...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...s_negligence_equals_extreme_carelessness.html
iuliani makes that case that when it comes to laws surrounding handling classified data, intent is irrelevant. "The definition of gross negligence under the law is extreme carelessness," he said. The FBI "clearly found a direct violation of 18 United States code section 793 which does not require intent -- it requires only gross negligence in the handling of anything relating to the national defense."
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
absolutely no intent is required.. it's the handling itself of the info , not the intent behind the handling that is "gross negligence"
 
anatta said:
absolutely no intent is required.. it's the handling itself of the info , not the intent behind the handling that is "gross negligence"
Click to expand...
Interestingly the director of the FBI,
a republican that clearly doesn't want Hilary as POTUS disagrees with you.
What does that make you, idiot?
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
What he meant was it was pointless to appeal to them.

That's always been a problem for republican contenders: how to appeal to them without effectively abandoning small government principles.
Click to expand...
You can't appeal to 'them', by giving them a $400/year tax break, while giving millions to the average billionaire.

Couple that with the program cuts that go with those tax cuts, and it certainly appears the Conservatives don't care about them.
 
Leonthecat said:
Trumpf may not be a Democrat in name this year...but you can't deny that he is a New York pro-choice liberal...
He may have said the things he knew he needed to say to get to where he is today in your party, but in your heart you have to know that's not what he really believes.
Poor Pimp
Click to expand...

May well be true. Trump has no voting record that we can use to judge him. He says things i like but it may all be lies.
 
Rune said:
Ghouliani violated the Constitution for years with Stop and Frisk...
Click to expand...

HAHAHA. Nothing in the constitution about stop and frisk. The 4A does ban unreasonable search and seizure but "unreasonable" is one of the great weasel words, THINK, you miserable america-hating wretch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top