The Turtle strikes!

Darth Omar said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1344073406040436737

That’s slick.

Force democrats to back a bill that would fund a commission to study voting fraud and repeal section 230 so Twitter and Co can no longer restrict free speech AND increase COVID relief to $2000/person.
Click to expand...

You do not get it.

McConnell just punked Trump.

He added a partisan poison pill to the relief bill to ensure Americans never get the two grand, while only paying lip service to Trump's Twitter demands to gin up support for overturning Trump's election loss.

McConnell knows adding a partisan poison pill to what was originally a clean, stand alone $2000 relief bill effectively kills it.

Trump gets nothing to show for his Twitter demands.

And McConnell wins by ensuring Americans never get a clean, stand alone $2000 relief bill.
 
Cypress said:
You do not get it.

McConnell just punked Trump.

He added a partisan poison pill to the relief bill to ensure Americans never get the two grand, while only paying lip service to Trump's Twitter demands to gin up support for overturning Trump's election loss.

McConnell knows adding a partisan poison pill to what was originally a clean, stand alone $2000 relief bill effectively kills it.

Trump gets nothing to show for his Twitter demands.

And McConnell wins by ensuring Americans never get a clean, stand alone $2000 relief bill.
Click to expand...

I don’t get what’s so objectionable about the bill.

Democrats won’t give up [what they assure us will be] a meaningless investigation of voting fraud in the election and a revoking of Big Tech’s Section 203 status. The latter will have no practical effect, since, again, Democrats assure us, Big Tech doesn’t violate 203 anyway.

And for those two alleged Nothing Burgers they will deprive voters of a $2000 stimulus. You’re sure democrats are on the right side of this?
 
Darth Omar said:
I don’t get what’s so objectionable about the bill.

Democrats won’t give up [what they assure us will be] a meaningless investigation of voting fraud in the election and a revoking of Big Tech’s Section 203 status. The latter will have no practical effect, since, again, Democrats assure us, Big Tech doesn’t violate 203 anyway.

And for those two alleged Nothing Burgers they will deprive voters of a $2000 stimulus. You’re sure democrats are on the right side of this?
Click to expand...

Why add it to a bill that's designed as a relief effort to struggling Americans?

I thought you were supposed to be all skeptical and free-thinking?
 
Darth Omar said:
I don’t get what’s so objectionable about the bill.

Democrats won’t give up [what they assure us will be] a meaningless investigation of voting fraud in the election and a revoking of Big Tech’s Section 203 status. The latter will have no practical effect, since, again, Democrats assure us, Big Tech doesn’t violate 203 anyway.

And for those two alleged Nothing Burgers they will deprive voters of a $2000 stimulus. You’re sure democrats are on the right side of this?
Click to expand...

Less than a week ago, Trump ass kissers on this forum said they wanted a clean $2000 COVID relief bill free of any perceived partsan add-ons.

Nancy Pelosi gave you exactly what you were demanding less than 72 hours ago.
 
Worthless Republican investigations that net no convictions, no reports even scolding Biden or any state official
accomplish nothing but provide Republicans conspiratorial bubble oxygen. Repukes want to knowingly legitimize
utter BS using color of office. Fuck off.
 
Cypress said:
Less than a week ago, Trump ass kissers on this forum said they wanted a clean $2000 COVID relief bill free of any perceived partsan add-ons.

Nancy Pelosi gave you exactly what you were demanding less than 72 hours ago.
Click to expand...

Is that anything like loading the pre-election bill up with absurd stuff knowing the Senate would reject it and keep Trump from signing a stimulus bill before the election?

Something like that?
 
dukkha said:
ha ha ha
so you endorse shutting people down on Twitter and FB if it's not approved political speech.
Social media is the equivalent of the old fashioned town square -it's the common platform we all use for political speech

and you are just fine with only approved speech = fascist
Click to expand...

they do not ban people for just making stupid ass political statements. you are being too babyish and sensitive.
 
Cypress said:
Less than a week ago, Trump ass kissers on this forum said they wanted a clean $2000 COVID relief bill free of any perceived partsan add-ons.

Nancy Pelosi gave you exactly what you were demanding less than 72 hours ago.
Click to expand...

we wanted relief without giving more to foreign countries than they gave to Americans.......nothing clean ever comes from demmycrats......
 
Micawber said:
Worthless Republican investigations that net no convictions, no reports even scolding Biden or any state official
accomplish nothing but provide Republicans conspiratorial bubble oxygen. Repukes want to knowingly legitimize
utter BS using color of office. Fuck off.
Click to expand...
we haven't even begun the investigations........you have the next four years to look forward to......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you mean, like tying covid relief to a pork bill?......
Click to expand...
NO, MORON.

Congress has been negotiating with Moscow McTurtle, Mnuchin for a stimulus bill, since May.
Moscow McTurtle and teabaggers refused to vote on it, so now, the stimulus and the spending bill had to be voted on together, because of McTurtle.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
we wanted relief without giving more to foreign countries than they gave to Americans.......nothing clean ever comes from demmycrats......
Click to expand...

Then why didn't Moscow McTurtle vote on the stimulus bill months ago, instead the idiot waited until the last minute.
If the stimulus were directed a corporations, McTurtle would have signed the bill in June.

Teabaggers love corporate socialism, anyone else? Not so much.
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
they do not ban people for just making stupid ass political statements. you are being too babyish and sensitive.
Click to expand...
sure they do. if you had a clue you would understand political speech is an enumerated Constitutional right.
ANY banning or editorializing by social media is an interference in everyone's ability to be heard.

They can editorialize or ban - but they can't or should not be able to do so without victims recourse to capricious bans
Section 230 gives them power to editorialize or ban without recourse.
 
no worries said:
NO, MORON.

Congress has been negotiating with Moscow McTurtle, Mnuchin for a stimulus bill, since May.
Moscow McTurtle and teabaggers refused to vote on it, so now, the stimulus and the spending bill had to be voted on together, because of McTurtle.
Click to expand...

because of Peloser......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top