The Snyder Act 1924

F

FastLane

Verified User
The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, (43 Stat. 253, enacted June 2, 1924) was an Act of the United States Congress that declared Indigenous persons born within the United States are US citizens. Although the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that any person born in the United States is a citizen, there is an exception for persons not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the federal government. This language was generally taken to mean members of various tribes that were treated as separate sovereignties: they were citizens of their tribal nations.....

en.wikipedia.org

Indian Citizenship Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

=======================================

So if Native American born in America were not citizens and a Congressional act was required to grant them citizenship why is the child of two illegal aliens a citizen.
 
FastLane said:
The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, (43 Stat. 253, enacted June 2, 1924) was an Act of the United States Congress that declared Indigenous persons born within the United States are US citizens. Although the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that any person born in the United States is a citizen, there is an exception for persons not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the federal government. This language was generally taken to mean members of various tribes that were treated as separate sovereignties: they were citizens of their tribal nations.....

en.wikipedia.org

Indian Citizenship Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

=======================================

So if Native American born in America were not citizens and a Congressional act was required to grant them citizenship why is the child of two illegal aliens a citizen.
Click to expand...
Translation: Native Americans born on sovereign tribal land inside the United States are US citizens.

This has nothing to do with the anchor babies MAGAts are so butthurt about.

When MAGAts yammer about "the unborn", they only mean the white unborn, not the brown ones.

9hjr44.jpg
 
John A. Bingham wrote the 14th amendment and he did not believe the child of two illegals has birthright citizenship.
 
FastLane said:
John A. Bingham wrote the 14th amendment and he did not believe the child of two illegals has birthright citizenship.
Click to expand...
Link?

FastLane said:
The 14th does not automatically give Birthright citizenship to children of illegals born in the US.
Click to expand...
Regardless, SCOTUS upheld the birthright clause.

time.com

Birthright Citizenship Has Been Challenged Before

The 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship, and the courts have long upheld it. President-elect Trump wants to overturn that precedent.
time.com time.com
Their argument will be straightforward. The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in the wake of the Civil War, guarantees U.S. citizenship to all those “born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” In 1898, in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court recognized that these words cover everyone born in the United States, except under a very small number of narrowly defined circumstances. The Supreme Court’s holding in Wong Kim Ark has remained undisturbed for the past 126 years.

www.usconstitution.net

Is Every Child Born in the US Automatically a Citizen? Unpacking the 14th Amendment! - U.S. Constitution.net

Historical Context of the 14th Amendment The period leading to the ratification of the 14th Amendment was marked by the Civil War and the Abolitionist Movement. This amendment, introduced in 1866 and ratified in 1868, was aimed primarily at securing the rights of newly freed slaves. Vote 🗳️ Show...
www.usconstitution.net www.usconstitution.net
The Supreme Court's decision affirmed Wong's citizenship by birth, interpreting the jurisdictional clause as implying that anyone born on American soil, excluding children of foreign diplomats or enemy soldiers, is subject to U.S jurisdiction and thus an American citizen.


This interpretation affirmed the principle of jus soli—right of the soil—as a fundamental aspect of American nationality law, contrasting with jus sanguinis—right of blood—which many other countries follow to determine citizenship based on one's parents' nationality. The Court's ruling held that the jurisdiction the U.S. wields over an individual born in its territories is sufficiently absolute and qualifies that individual for citizenship, dismissing counterclaims that allegiance to a parent's nationality negates the jurisdictional clause.
 
FastLane said:
He wrote about it. If it granted automatic citizenship to the offspring of non-citizens then Congress did not need to pass the Snyder act to grant Native Americans citizenship.
Click to expand...
Do you understand that Native American land is sovereign?

Stop doing drugs, FatLane. They're making you stupid.

www.usconstitution.net

Uncovering Native American Sovereignty - U.S. Constitution.net

The U.S. Constitution provides a foundation for recognizing the sovereignty of Native American tribes. Through various clauses and historical precedents, it acknowledges the distinct status of these tribes within the American governance framework. Understanding this relationship requires...
www.usconstitution.net www.usconstitution.net
The U.S. Constitution provides a foundation for recognizing the sovereignty of Native American tribes. Through various clauses and historical precedents, it acknowledges the distinct status of these tribes within the American governance framework. Understanding this relationship requires examining key constitutional provisions, landmark Supreme Court cases, and significant federal legislation that have shaped tribal sovereignty over the years.
 
The 14th was written to provide citizenship to the kids of people that were forcibly brought to the US. Illegal immigrants chose to illegally be here. Their kids are subject to their parents country.
 
Tbird19482 said:
And you know this how? Were you there and talked to him? Just what to make sure we got this right.
Click to expand...


"We"?

John A. Bingham, often regarded as the chief architect of the Fourteenth Amendment, expressed views during the debates that are pivotal to understanding his position. He notably said, “I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” This implies a condition of parental allegiance to the U.S. for citizenship by birth. However, this statement was made in the context of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 rather than directly about the Fourteenth Amendment.

@Grok
 
Diogenes said:
"We"?

John A. Bingham, often regarded as the chief architect of the Fourteenth Amendment, expressed views during the debates that are pivotal to understanding his position. He notably said, “I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” This implies a condition of parental allegiance to the U.S. for citizenship by birth. However, this statement was made in the context of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 rather than directly about the Fourteenth Amendment.

@Grok
Click to expand...
Yes WE?
you fucking ASSHOLE.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top