The rats are running for the exits

[canceled.2021.1]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...cs-claims-unaware-dnc-funded-russian-dossier/


It looks like this little matter of "oppo research" that the JPP liberals claim is normal practice isn't something anyone wants to have their fingerprints on.

Current democrat party chairman says it wasn't him. Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz who is embroiled in an IT scandal of her own says she didn't know about it. Clinton denied it for a year.


Talk about a case of hot potato

Now if this is such a nothing burger as the JPP Liberals claim and it is just run of the mill opposition research, then why isn't there anyone taking credit for it? Why are they running from it?

 

[MAGA MAN]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...cs-claims-unaware-dnc-funded-russian-dossier/


It looks like this little matter of "oppo research" that the JPP liberals claim is normal practice isn't something anyone wants to have their fingerprints on.

Current democrat party chairman says it wasn't him. Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz who is embroiled in an IT scandal of her own says she didn't know about it. Clinton denied it for a year.


Talk about a case of hot potato

Now if this is such a nothing burger as the JPP Liberals claim and it is just run of the mill opposition research, then why isn't there anyone taking credit for it? Why are they running from it?

Brad is trying to deflect by claiming Trump's opo research was illegal.

 

[Jarod]

Good, get rid of em.

 

[archives]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...cs-claims-unaware-dnc-funded-russian-dossier/


It looks like this little matter of "oppo research" that the JPP liberals claim is normal practice isn't something anyone wants to have their fingerprints on.

Current democrat party chairman says it wasn't him. Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz who is embroiled in an IT scandal of her own says she didn't know about it. Clinton denied it for a year.


Talk about a case of hot potato

Now if this is such a nothing burger as the JPP Liberals claim and it is just run of the mill opposition research, then why isn't there anyone taking credit for it? Why are they running from it?

Let's deal with the source first, almost up there with Info Wars

https://www.snopes.com/tag/the-gateway-pundit/

Secondly, nice to see the the conservative wish list hasn't dissipated, humorous how after nine years thier still grasping at any innuendo that comes along

And as I noted earlier, has it ever dawn on you people that even though the GOP controls all three branches of Gov't your still involved in scapegoating the past? Who cares, Hillary is history, has zero effect on events today, well, not entirely true if you desperately need a deflection off this Administration's blunders

Sure to get now, "you don't know the facts," and "your just ignoring the truth," been hearing these same "facts" and "truth" for nine years straight now

 

[Stretch]

Let's deal with the source first, almost up there with Info Wars

https://www.snopes.com/tag/the-gateway-pundit/

Secondly, nice to see the the conservative wish list hasn't dissipated, humorous how after nine years thier still grasping at any innuendo that comes along

And as I noted earlier, has it ever dawn on you people that even though the GOP controls all three branches of Gov't your still involved in scapegoating the past? Who cares, Hillary is history, has zero effect on events today, well, not entirely true if you desperately need a deflection off this Administration's blunders

Sure to get now, "you don't know the facts," and "your just ignoring the truth," been hearing these same "facts" and "truth" for nine years straight now

This news is more recent. More like the last 9 months. You know.......like all the stuff everybody left and right have been discussing here in the Forum all this time.

 

[zappasguitar]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...cs-claims-unaware-dnc-funded-russian-dossier/


It looks like this little matter of "oppo research" that the JPP liberals claim is normal practice isn't something anyone wants to have their fingerprints on.

Current democrat party chairman says it wasn't him. Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz who is embroiled in an IT scandal of her own says she didn't know about it. Clinton denied it for a year.


Talk about a case of hot potato

Now if this is such a nothing burger as the JPP Liberals claim and it is just run of the mill opposition research, then why isn't there anyone taking credit for it? Why are they running from it?

ROFL!!

"Gateway Pundit.com"??

What's wrong, nothing on InfoWars.com you could use?

Y-E-S folks, Trumpkins ARE that desperate for a win!

 

[Stretch]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...cs-claims-unaware-dnc-funded-russian-dossier/


It looks like this little matter of "oppo research" that the JPP liberals claim is normal practice isn't something anyone wants to have their fingerprints on.

Current democrat party chairman says it wasn't him. Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz who is embroiled in an IT scandal of her own says she didn't know about it. Clinton denied it for a year.

Yeah, gets a little messy when ya pay a foreign national and try to hide it by reporting it as "legal fees".

 

[archives]

'Fact-checking' website Snopes is asking its users for help in a GoFundMe saying an 'outside vendor' is 'holding it hostage'. But the site which claims to be 'transparent' and to tell people the facts they need to know hasn't told those donating everything that is going on.

In fact it is at the center of a bitter legal battle with its CEO being accused of fraud, lies, conspiracy and putting prostitutes and his honeymoon on expenses.

David Mikkelson set up the company which owns Snopes.com in 2003 with then-wife Barbara, but she sold her 50 per cent stake during their bitter divorce.

The owners of the company which provided it with tech and advertising services bought her stake but have now fallen out with Mikkelson and call him a fraudster.







http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html

Did you really think a bogus news source as the Gateway Pundit would only need one source to discredit it? There's examples everywhere

http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/02/false-news-of-the-vegas-attack-spread-on-google-facebook/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/
http://www.businessinsider.com/las-vegas-shooting-mandalay-bay-facebook-twitter-google-2017-10
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit

 

[archives]

This news is more recent. More like the last 9 months. You know.......like all the stuff everybody left and right have been discussing here in the Forum all this time.

The "news" is always "more recent," it's been "more recent" for nine years straight now, one inneundo after another and none of them have turned out valid.

You people just can't shake your Hillary obsession, and it's comical here because none of this relates to today, nor has any bearing on today, as I said, your chasing last year's scapegoats

 

[canceled.2021.1]

ROFL!!

"Gateway Pundit.com"??

What's wrong, nothing on InfoWars.com you could use?

Y-E-S folks, Trumpkins ARE that desperate for a win!

Interesting that you are attacking the source. Have you always held this position that where facts come matters? Past posts would suggest you haven't always felt that way. But maybe you have changed? I am sure you will have some lame excuse how this prior position isn't exactly the same. Or maybe you will try to claim that you "live rent free in my head". Or maybe you will just ignore it altogether. There are any number of Zappocrite tactics you can employ. I know what we won't see. We won't see you acknowledge your hypocrisy. That I am sure of

Facts are facts. Numbers don't change depending on which website they happen to come from. But here you are, attacking the source once more. If you had anything more substantial, you'd post it.

 

[zappasguitar]

Interesting that you are attacking the source. Have you always held this position that where facts come matters? Past posts would suggest you haven't always felt that way. But maybe you have changed? I am sure you will have some lame excuse how this prior position isn't exactly the same. Or maybe you will try to claim that you "live rent free in my head". Or maybe you will just ignore it altogether. There are any number of Zappocrite tactics you can employ. I know what we won't see. We won't see you acknowledge your hypocrisy. That I am sure of

Well, seeing as how you just spent so much time pondering how I might respond to your post, I'm going to have to go with:

I TRULY AM LIVING RENT FREE INSIDE ILA'S HEAD.

That said, what you won't find ILA owning up to, is the baseless supposition the author at Gateway Pundit engages in while trying engaging in SPECULATION and GUESS the motivations of the people he names.

Nope, you won't see him acknowledge that tiny little fact.

 

[Русский агент]

Don't ask Zappacrite to back up his own claims.

He'll alternate between ignoring any requests for corroboration, falsely claiming he already provided it (while failing to link to it), and pouting that he doesn't have to prove what he says is true - because you were mean to him.

 

[Huey]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...cs-claims-unaware-dnc-funded-russian-dossier/


It looks like this little matter of "oppo research" that the JPP liberals claim is normal practice isn't something anyone wants to have their fingerprints on.

Current democrat party chairman says it wasn't him. Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz who is embroiled in an IT scandal of her own says she didn't know about it. Clinton denied it for a year.


Talk about a case of hot potato

Now if this is such a nothing burger as the JPP Liberals claim and it is just run of the mill opposition research, then why isn't there anyone taking credit for it? Why are they running from it?

it is only oppo research when dems get caught working with a foreign government during an election. Otherwise they call it treason. ‘Specially when they lose.

 

[Teflon Don]

Well, seeing as how you just spent so much time pondering how I might respond to your post, I'm going to have to go with:

I TRULY AM LIVING RENT FREE INSIDE ILA'S HEAD.

That said, what you won't find ILA owning up to, is the baseless supposition the author at Gateway Pundit engages in while trying engaging in SPECULATION and GUESS the motivations of the people he names.

Nope, you won't see him acknowledge that tiny little fact.

So quoting a post means you are living rent free in my head? Interesting conclusion. First you act just as I predicted. Second what does you putting my quotes in your signature line mean?

Lastly, I knew you wouldn’t admit your hypocrisy. Thanks for proving me right.

 

[Stretch]

The "news" is always "more recent," it's been "more recent" for nine years straight now, one inneundo after another and none of them have turned out valid.

You people just can't shake your Hillary obsession, and it's comical here because none of this relates to today, nor has any bearing on today, as I said, your chasing last year's scapegoats

Actually it's Hillary who can not shake her Hillary obsession who's grabbing every inch of spotlight she can continually.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

Here's a good one:

 

[Teflon Don]

Here's a good one:

That is so fucking awesome. Sounds like every libtard on here

 

[Stretch]

Here's a good one:

Priceless

 

[canceled.2021.1]

I am starting to think I should start thread banning Zappocrite again to protect him from me. He seems to always get fisted in my threads


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[MAGA MAN]

Don't ask Zappacrite to back up his own claims.

He'll alternate between ignoring any requests for corroboration, falsely claiming he already provided it (while failing to link to it), and pouting that he doesn't have to prove what he says is true - because you were mean to him.

Zippy is such a dishonest poster.