The Medicare Administrative Cost Myth - BUSTED

canceled.2021.1

#AMERICAISDEAD
We are told that Medicare has lower administrative costs than private insurance. Now intuitively everyone knows that can't be right. How can the organization that gave us $600 toilets for the military, the US Post Office (bankrupt), and Solyndra keep the costs down of anything? They can't and they don't. It is all a lie

As the following article points out it is nothing more than accounting sleight of hand

http://www.heritage.org/research/re...e-higher-not-lower-than-for-private-insurance
 
wow, I can't believe nobody had anything to say about this one.

Let me help out... Here's a bit of the article:

Many advocates of a public health plan--either a "single-payer" plan or a "public option"--claim that a public health plan will save money compared to private health insurance because "everyone knows" that the largest government health program, Medicare, has lower administrative costs than private insurance. Some even claim that switching every private insured American to Medicare or something like it could save the nation enough money to cover all currently uninsured Americans.

Advocates of a public plan assert that Medicare has administrative costs of 3 percent (or 6 to 8 percent if support from other government agencies is included), compared to 14 to 22 percent for private employer-sponsored health insurance (depending on which study is cited), or even more for individually purchased insurance. They attribute the difference to superior efficiency of government,[1] private insurance companies' expenditures on marketing,[2] efforts to deny claims,[3] unrestrained pursuit of profit,[4] and high executive salaries.[5]

However, on a per-person basis Medicare's administrative costs are actually higher than those of private insurance--this despite the fact that private insurance companies do incur several categories of costs that do not apply to Medicare. If recent cost history is any guide, switching the more than 200 million Americans with private insurance to a public plan will not save money but will actually increase health care administrative costs by several billion dollars.

Fuzzy Math

Medicare patients are by definition elderly, disabled, or patients with end-stage renal disease, and as such have higher average patient care costs, so expressing administrative costs as a percentage of total costs gives a misleading picture of relative efficiency. Administrative costs are incurred primarily on a fixed or per-beneficiary basis; this approach spreads Medicare's costs over a larger base of patient care cost.
 
I think that people who want to ballance the budget on the backs of the elderly disabled and poor are not worth listening to.
 
dont give me that line of right wing bullshit. Your selfish because people like you want to take what little the poor have and put it towards America's over bloated millitary.

Where do you get that nonsense? That is just sophomoric drivel. You act like you are some big defender of the poor when it is precisely the policies you support that cripples and hampers them and keeps them poor. Spare me your phony sympathy for the poor
 
Where do you get that nonsense? That is just sophomoric drivel. You act like you are some big defender of the poor when it is precisely the policies you support that cripples and hampers them and keeps them poor. Spare me your phony sympathy for the poor

Your just another worthless peice of shit conservitive.
 
Your just another worthless peice of shit conservitive.

Do you know that we spend enough money $1 trillion a year on transfer payments excluding Socialist inSecurity and Mediscare? Do you also know that it would WIPE out poverty? Yeah. Its true.

So apparently your way isn't working. We are redistributing wealth to the tune of $1 trillion a year and still it isn't enough for you greedy pricks. How much is enough?
 
Back
Top