The LEFT's Four-Part Strategy to Destroy America

Libhater

Verified User
1. Defund the police

2. Which delegitimizes the police

3. Even more, it delegitimizes the community. The community determines the norms the police are maintaining and establishes the metaphysics which everybody--
including criminals--at least take account of. (For instance, prior to the most recent plunge under Democrats' governance, nobody had sex on the sidewalk or
defecated there. It was uncool for everybody.)

4. After Democrats' governance has delegitimized the police and then the community, how does the community defend itself? By volunteers using the second
Amendment. Except that Democrats' governance criminalizes those who step in.

Quite a package! De-police the country; disarm the citizens (Nazism & Communism), convert Enterprise America to Welfare America. Top-Down socialism. No rights. No freedom. No constitution. No community. That's the fight we're in.

Blue City San Fransicko is the poster child for this four-part strategy for Democrat-led governance. It had "defunded the police", has attenuated public order, with public spaces filled with tents of the homeless, drug usage, drug paraphernalia and human waste, robberies of Amazon packages from front doors. There is so much mob looting of stores that retailers are moving out.

By Greg P. Richards


ps: I just heard that some 800,000 people have moved out of that socialist state of Kalifornicator in this past year alone. Where they headed you ask? The RED states of Texas and Florida among a few other red states where they can lead a safe and prosperous lifestyle.
 
This kind of people is walking around in public, driving vehicles, and voting.
 
Why do you deliberately leave out the source of the quoted text?

Once again, you failed to accept the author of this piece who I clearly posted his name J.B. Shurk at the very bottom right before I posted my ps.
Why is it that you're almost always the first and perhaps only person to question the source (which in the long run doesn't matter at all), but refuse
to engage in reasonable debate with said posting? You once said you don't respond to any posts that don't have a so-called source link attached.
Well, the source here is the author J.B. Shurk, and if that isn't good enough for you, then you should just bow out from ever responding at all to any
if not all of my sourced posts.
 
Once again, you failed to accept the author of this piece who I clearly posted his name J.B. Shurk at the very bottom right before I posted my ps.
Why is it that you're almost always the first and perhaps only person to question the source (which in the long run doesn't matter at all), but refuse
to engage in reasonable debate with said posting? You once said you don't respond to any posts that don't have a so-called source link attached.
Well, the source here is the author J.B. Shurk, and if that isn't good enough for you, then you should just bow out from ever responding at all to any
if not all of my sourced posts.

You don't know where you copied that from?!
 
You don't know where you copied that from?!

Look idiot, do you know what an opinion piece or the opinion section is of most newspapers from around the nation?
If you do, and if you're able to grasp the possibility that I and perhaps others here have copied a politically oriented
opinion piece from any local newspaper that has the author's name on it--like the one right here has, then you would
or should know that its impossible to produce a link to any particular opinion piece. So, what would it matter if I was to give
you the name of the particular small town newspaper where I got this particular post? You would have never known of
this particular small town newspaper. Even if you did, what the f**k does it matter, and what the f**k relevance would any
newspaper name have concerning any particular opinion piece? Nothing, that's what!
 
Look idiot, do you know what an opinion piece or the opinion section is of most newspapers from around the nation?
If you do, and if you're able to grasp the possibility that I and perhaps others here have copied a politically oriented
opinion piece from any local newspaper that has the author's name on it--like the one right here has, then you would
or should know that its impossible to produce a link to any particular opinion piece. So, what would it matter if I was to give
you the name of the particular small town newspaper where I got this particular post? You would have never known of
this particular small town newspaper. Even if you did, what the f**k does it matter, and what the f**k relevance would any
newspaper name have concerning any particular opinion piece? Nothing, that's what!

Ay carumba!
 
1. Defund the police

2. Which delegitimizes the police

3. Even more, it delegitimizes the community. The community determines the norms the police are maintaining and establishes the metaphysics which everybody--
including criminals--at least take account of. (For instance, prior to the most recent plunge under Democrats' governance, nobody had sex on the sidewalk or
defecated there. It was uncool for everybody.)

4. After Democrats' governance has delegitimized the police and then the community, how does the community defend itself? By volunteers using the second
Amendment. Except that Democrats' governance criminalizes those who step in.

Quite a package! De-police the country; disarm the citizens (Nazism & Communism), convert Enterprise America to Welfare America. Top-Down socialism. No rights. No freedom. No constitution. No community. That's the fight we're in.

Blue City San Fransicko is the poster child for this four-part strategy for Democrat-led governance. It had "defunded the police", has attenuated public order, with public spaces filled with tents of the homeless, drug usage, drug paraphernalia and human waste, robberies of Amazon packages from front doors. There is so much mob looting of stores that retailers are moving out.

By Greg P. Richards


ps: I just heard that some 800,000 people have moved out of that socialist state of Kalifornicator in this past year alone. Where they headed you ask? The RED states of Texas and Florida among a few other red states where they can lead a safe and prosperous lifestyle.

I think if you think the GOP isn't all in on this then you're not seeing things as they are. We need to start hanging people for treason...after their day in court of course.
 
I think if you think the GOP isn't all in on this then you're not seeing things as they are. We need to start hanging people for treason...after their day in court of course.

Tell me how specifically the GOP is in on this totally democrat led strategy to destroy America. While I do agree that much of the deep state of the democrat party is involved in treasonous actions (most of all the biden crime family syndicate), I'm not quite ready to hang the assholes as of yet, but I would be satisfied to have the band of leftist criminals do some hard time, and of course throw the crooked hildebast in with them all.
 
Why do you think the left wants to burn down the house they live in? The entire premise is just ridiculously stupid.
 
1. Defund the police

2. Which delegitimizes the police

3. Even more, it delegitimizes the community. The community determines the norms the police are maintaining and establishes the metaphysics which everybody--
including criminals--at least take account of. (For instance, prior to the most recent plunge under Democrats' governance, nobody had sex on the sidewalk or
defecated there. It was uncool for everybody.)

4. After Democrats' governance has delegitimized the police and then the community, how does the community defend itself? By volunteers using the second
Amendment. Except that Democrats' governance criminalizes those who step in.

Quite a package! De-police the country; disarm the citizens (Nazism & Communism), convert Enterprise America to Welfare America. Top-Down socialism. No rights. No freedom. No constitution. No community. That's the fight we're in.

Blue City San Fransicko is the poster child for this four-part strategy for Democrat-led governance. It had "defunded the police", has attenuated public order, with public spaces filled with tents of the homeless, drug usage, drug paraphernalia and human waste, robberies of Amazon packages from front doors. There is so much mob looting of stores that retailers are moving out.

By Greg P. Richards


ps: I just heard that some 800,000 people have moved out of that socialist state of Kalifornicator in this past year alone. Where they headed you ask? The RED states of Texas and Florida among a few other red states where they can lead a safe and prosperous lifestyle.

Or, we could live in West Bumfuck, Middle America
and throw our own feces at one another,
befitting the evolutionary level attained by most politically conservative Americans.
 
Nobody is defunding the police. That was a bad name to give to the idea that SOME of the department money should be invested in getting psychologists to do some of the police work. The ones where people are acting a bit crazy. They can defuse the incidents instead of brutalizing them and making them worse. Some cities are doing it with great success.
 
Nobody is defunding the police. That was a bad name to give to the idea that SOME of the department money should be invested in getting psychologists to do some of the police work. The ones where people are acting a bit crazy. They can defuse the incidents instead of brutalizing them and making them worse. Some cities are doing it with great success.

So you are claiming that no cities drastically reduced funding for their police during this movement
?

Now I want you to think carefully before you answer
 
1. Defund the police

2. Which delegitimizes the police

3. Even more, it delegitimizes the community. The community determines the norms the police are maintaining and establishes the metaphysics which everybody--
including criminals--at least take account of. (For instance, prior to the most recent plunge under Democrats' governance, nobody had sex on the sidewalk or
defecated there. It was uncool for everybody.)

4. After Democrats' governance has delegitimized the police and then the community, how does the community defend itself? By volunteers using the second
Amendment. Except that Democrats' governance criminalizes those who step in.

Quite a package! De-police the country; disarm the citizens (Nazism & Communism), convert Enterprise America to Welfare America. Top-Down socialism. No rights. No freedom. No constitution. No community. That's the fight we're in.

Blue City San Fransicko is the poster child for this four-part strategy for Democrat-led governance. It had "defunded the police", has attenuated public order, with public spaces filled with tents of the homeless, drug usage, drug paraphernalia and human waste, robberies of Amazon packages from front doors. There is so much mob looting of stores that retailers are moving out.

By Greg P. Richards


ps: I just heard that some 800,000 people have moved out of that socialist state of Kalifornicator in this past year alone. Where they headed you ask? The RED states of Texas and Florida among a few other red states where they can lead a safe and prosperous lifestyle.

Seeing no one is defunding the police, even your scapegoat SF (“Police department budget up 4.4% since 2019,” your whole thread is blown up

Get back to us when you got something real
 
1. Defund the police

2. Which delegitimizes the police

3. Even more, it delegitimizes the community. The community determines the norms the police are maintaining and establishes the metaphysics which everybody--
including criminals--at least take account of. (For instance, prior to the most recent plunge under Democrats' governance, nobody had sex on the sidewalk or
defecated there. It was uncool for everybody.)

4. After Democrats' governance has delegitimized the police and then the community, how does the community defend itself? By volunteers using the second
Amendment. Except that Democrats' governance criminalizes those who step in.

Quite a package! De-police the country; disarm the citizens (Nazism & Communism), convert Enterprise America to Welfare America. Top-Down socialism. No rights. No freedom. No constitution. No community. That's the fight we're in.

Blue City San Fransicko is the poster child for this four-part strategy for Democrat-led governance. It had "defunded the police", has attenuated public order, with public spaces filled with tents of the homeless, drug usage, drug paraphernalia and human waste, robberies of Amazon packages from front doors. There is so much mob looting of stores that retailers are moving out.

By Greg P. Richards


ps: I just heard that some 800,000 people have moved out of that socialist state of Kalifornicator in this past year alone. Where they headed you ask? The RED states of Texas and Florida among a few other red states where they can lead a safe and prosperous lifestyle.

Idaho and Montana are the top destinations for refugees from California. Unfortunately, the idiots moving to these states are bringing their destructive politics with them.
 
Seeing no one is defunding the police, even your scapegoat SF (“Police department budget up 4.4% since 2019,” your whole thread is blown up

Get back to us when you got something real

Oh look, a fascist democrat is lying.

Another demon got his horns...
 
Back
Top