The Hildebeast isn't the choice of young women

Legion Troll

A fine upstanding poster
rtx20w0n-e1456288326495.jpg


No takers?


“When my mother says she’s going to vote for Hillary Clinton because she’s a woman, to me that is identity politics at its worst,” Gemma Soldati says. “It’s putting the value of a female president over the value of a president with your values.”

Instead of joining the ranks of some who are eager to see a female president for the first time in the US, young women are opting en masse for Sanders, a candidate who captures their imagination with his promises of political revolution.

He swept their vote in the Iowa caucuses, winning the support of 84% of women under 30, and in the New Hampshire primary, where he beat Clinton by nearly 60 points in the same demographic, according to exit polls.

In Nevada, despite Clinton’s comfortable win, young voters (a gender breakdown was unavailable) continued to turn out for Sanders, giving him 82% of their votes.

This election’s Democrat nomination process is showing that women cannot be treated as a distinct voting block, as Hillary Clinton’s candidacy brings an intergenerational feminist schism into public view.

While many older women are thrilled to see a woman having a shot at the presidency during their lifetime, for many younger women, gender matters less. For them, “women’s issues,” as they’re classically defined, are taking a back seat.

As far as they’re concerned, Clinton stands at the apex of the establishment pyramid, one that is entrenched in the power politics of Washington, far removed from the average young American. She’s just another politician, and that class as a whole should not be trusted.

Young women grew up in a different world than that of Clinton’s generation. Society pressures them less to get married or have children, the gender pay gap among their peers is 93%— far smaller than for the overall population.

The young women choosing Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton identify a wide variety of issues that weigh on their election choices: economic equality, finance reform, racial justice and criminal justice, climate change, foreign policy, education.

Clinton also has more baggage to weigh her down in these young women’s eyes: her support for the war in Iraq, for example, an “extremely influential” moment in their political coming of age, or her ties with Wall Street and support for fracking. Clinton’s financial backing from the private prison industry, a much maligned element of America’s mass incarceration problem, is also a recurring theme.

There’s also Clinton’s “authenticity” problem. Polls show she continues to be dinged on her “trustworthiness” and “honesty”.



http://qz.com/623503/why-young-women-reject-hillary-clintons-brand-of-feminism/?google_editors_picks=true
 
How many of those shadows in the background are young women other than the one standing at the Hillary for President table?

There's one and only one reason why younger idiots support Bernie. Bernie has promised them so many things for nothing and fooled them into believing it's owed to them. Not hard to get support when you promise a bunch of freeloaders something like college because their own sorry parents won't invest in them.
 
Qualified to be president? To hear her supporters tell it, no candidate could be more qualified.

James Carville, the well-known political adviser, made the claim. “We’ve got the best chance we’ve ever had to put a woman in the White House,” Carville wrote in a fundraising e-mail, “and oh, by the way, she just happens to be the most qualified candidate maybe since General George Washington himself!!”

Those who rave like this about Clinton’s qualifications are generally talking about her resume: eight years as first lady, eight more as senator from New York, four years as secretary of state. Earlier, she was a partner in the Rose Law Firm and head of the Legal Services Corporation. It all makes for an impressive CV, arguably the most impressive of the current presidential contenders. But does it really make for “the best qualified presidential candidate ever”? Or even the best qualified in 2016?



https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/02/03/does-hillary-resume-really-make-her-best-qualified-presidential-candidate/oVQRpgfUR5xvtmZylUYUbO/story.html
 
When my mother says she’s going to vote for Hillary Clinton because she’s a woman, to me that is identity politics at its worst,” Gemma Soldati says. “It’s putting the value of a female president over the value of a president with your values.”
:cheer:
 
Estrogen electoral elective?

A list of offices held is a flimsy guide to the quality of a presidential candidate.

Integrity, vision, humility, consistency of purpose, a willingness to learn — those are far more reliable indicators of excellence in a potential president.

Clinton has a resume.

History repeatedly reminds us that it takes more than that to make a fine president.



https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/02/03/does-hillary-resume-really-make-her-best-qualified-presidential-candidate/oVQRpgfUR5xvtmZylUYUbO/story.html
 
Still won't say who you'll vote for in the general election?

I predict you won't. Prove me wrong.
 
Back
Top