The greatest obscenity in the world?

[Lowaicue]

According to some people the presidential campaign is going to cost over a BILLION dollars.

But ...

1.5 MILLION = the number of children in America who go to sleep without a home each year

1 in 50 = an American child’s chances of experiencing homelessness in their lifetime

Mitt the tit is likely to spent $500,000,000 on his race and he and the world knows that the best he can do is to come second!

and 1,500,000 children are homeless at some time of the year in the country that Mitt the tit wants to govern.

Oh, its not only the fools on the right it's the fools on the left, too. Obama will be spending even more than Romney to stay in his nice little home on Pennsylvania Avenue.

If you give one dollar to these people when you could give that dollar to your own poor and under priviledged you are PART of that OBSCENITY!

And you call yourself christians! You worship a very strange god indeed! A god that rewards people for the cruelty they impose on their fellow men.

Dont vote for these bastards. String them up on the nearest tree. Show your countrymen that YOU are not a brain dead supporter of the rich, silver spoonfed sons and daughters of the corrupt and greedy.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

According to some people the presidential campaign is going to cost over a BILLION dollars.

But ...

1.5 MILLION = the number of children in America who go to sleep without a home each year

1 in 50 = an American child’s chances of experiencing homelessness in their lifetime

Mitt the tit is likely to spent $500,000,000 on his race and he and the world knows that the best he can do is to come second!

and 1,500,000 children are homeless at some time of the year in the country that Mitt the tit wants to govern.

Oh, its not only the fools on the right it's the fools on the left, too. Obama will be spending even more than Romney to stay in his nice little home on Pennsylvania Avenue.

If you give one dollar to these people when you could give that dollar to your own poor and under priviledged you are PART of that OBSCENITY!

And you call yourself christians! You worship a very strange god indeed! A god that rewards people for the cruelty they impose on their fellow men.

Dont vote for these bastards. String them up on the nearest tree. Show your countrymen that YOU are not a brain dead supporter of the rich, silver spoonfed sons and daughters of the corrupt and greedy.

1.2 Million * killed by your PLA masters.
That's about 17% of those that lived in Tibet, prior to the invasion.

Grow a pair, Low, and overthrow your masters.

 

[Disillusioned]

1.2 Million * killed by your PLA masters.
That's about 17% of those that lived in Tibet, prior to the invasion.

Grow a pair, Low, and overthrow your masters.

Really? Thread jacking doesnt even come close.

 

[RockX]

:lol:

What, no mention of Obama and the one billion dollars he plans on spending for the 2012 election???

Yep, you should string him up on the nearest tree for that...

 

[Damocles]

According to some people the presidential campaign is going to cost over a BILLION dollars.

But ...

1.5 MILLION = the number of children in America who go to sleep without a home each year

1 in 50 = an American child’s chances of experiencing homelessness in their lifetime

Mitt the tit is likely to spent $500,000,000 on his race and he and the world knows that the best he can do is to come second!

and 1,500,000 children are homeless at some time of the year in the country that Mitt the tit wants to govern.

Oh, its not only the fools on the right it's the fools on the left, too. Obama will be spending even more than Romney to stay in his nice little home on Pennsylvania Avenue.

If you give one dollar to these people when you could give that dollar to your own poor and under priviledged you are PART of that OBSCENITY!

And you call yourself christians! You worship a very strange god indeed! A god that rewards people for the cruelty they impose on their fellow men.

Dont vote for these bastards. String them up on the nearest tree. Show your countrymen that YOU are not a brain dead supporter of the rich, silver spoonfed sons and daughters of the corrupt and greedy.

You know what's interesting. Obama is going to spend 1 Billion Dollars and you don't even mention him.

You live in a nation where they force abortions on women and this is what you got? (And yes, you can pretend you don't live there because you are in Hong Kong, but it is a lie).

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

You know what's interesting. Obama is going to spend 1 Billion Dollars and you don't even mention him.

You live in a nation where they force abortions on women and this is what you got? (And yes, you can pretend you don't live there because you are in Hong Kong, but it is a lie).

Um... he did mention that Obama would be spending more... just sayin'

 

[Lowaicue]

:lol:

What, no mention of Obama and the one billion dollars he plans on spending for the 2012 election???

Yep, you should string him up on the nearest tree for that...

Read it again arsehole.

 

[Lowaicue]

You know what's interesting. Obama is going to spend 1 Billion Dollars and you don't even mention him.

You live in a nation where they force abortions on women and this is what you got? (And yes, you can pretend you don't live there because you are in Hong Kong, but it is a lie).

Y'know what? If you could read you'd see that he IS mentioned. Allow me: 'Oh, its not only the fools on the right it's the fools on the left, too. Obama will be spending even more than Romney to stay in his nice little home on Pennsylvania Avenue.'

No need to apologise. I know yanks dont do apologies.

 

[Lowaicue]

Um... he did mention that Obama would be spending more... just sayin'

I could not get accurate figures only guesstimates. I saw the 1 billion but I didnt have the time to verify it.
The fact is that it DOESNT MATTER who spends the money. It is simply obscene that it goes on bolstering the haves while hundreds of people sleep in drains in America and while ONE AND A HALF MILLION children are homeless at some point during the year.
All we get is not agreement, but 'yah boo, they did it too.'
What brainless fools these people are. I am really surprised at Damo.

 

[Lowaicue]

You know what's interesting. Obama is going to spend 1 Billion Dollars and you don't even mention him.

You live in a nation where they force abortions on women and this is what you got? (And yes, you can pretend you don't live there because you are in Hong Kong, but it is a lie).

You show yourself here to be an ignorant fool.

 

[RockX]

I could not get accurate figures only guesstimates. I saw the 1 billion but I didnt have the time to verify it.
The fact is that it DOESNT MATTER who spends the money. It is simply obscene that it goes on bolstering the haves while hundreds of people sleep in drains in America and while ONE AND A HALF MILLION children are homeless at some point during the year.
All we get is not agreement, but 'yah boo, they did it too.'
What brainless fools these people are. I am really surprised at Damo.

You had time time to Google all the facts on Romney and the amount he plans to spend, but could not take another 10 seconds to look at what Obama plans to spend. Spare me your false outrage.... asshole.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Um... he did mention that Obama would be spending more... just sayin'

Damo agreeing with Webbway, I never thought I live to see the day.

 

[Damocles]

Um... he did mention that Obama would be spending more... just sayin'

Did you see the name in there? I don't think I did. All his scorn was saved for Mitt... I got the feeling he doesn't like him.

 

[Damocles]

Y'know what? If you could read you'd see that he IS mentioned. Allow me: 'Oh, its not only the fools on the right it's the fools on the left, too. Obama will be spending even more than Romney to stay in his nice little home on Pennsylvania Avenue.'

No need to apologise. I know yanks dont do apologies.

Yeah, I had to re-read. I'm just wondering why all the scorn for the candidate that will spend less, but none for the one you side-mention will spend more?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Did you see the name in there? I don't think I did. All his scorn was saved for Mitt... I got the feeling he doesn't like him.

yeah, its in there. He said:

Oh, its not only the fools on the right it's the fools on the left, too. Obama will be spending even more than Romney to stay in his nice little home on Pennsylvania Avenue.

 

[Bonestorm]

Yeah, I had to re-read. I'm just wondering why all the scorn for the candidate that will spend less, but none for the one you side-mention will spend more?

The Republican candidate might spend less but only because he will raise less. The outside groups will more than make up for it though.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Damo agreeing with Webbway, I never thought I live to see the day.

selective reading... I did the same thing the first time I read the OP...

The way lowIQ states it, he mocks 'Mitt the tit'??? and mentions Obama. While he mentioned both, he was certainly mocking Mitt while trying to appear neutral. Hence the comment:

Mitt the tit is likely to spent $500,000,000 on his race and he and the world knows that the best he can do is to come second!

and 1,500,000 children are homeless at some time of the year in the country that Mitt the tit wants to govern.

Funny how that could have been written:

Obama brother to Osama (assuming the rhyme is a criteria) is likely to spent $1,000,000,000 on his race and he and the world knows that the best he can do is to come second!

and 1,500,000 children are homeless at some time of the year in the country that Obama brother to Osama governs.

 

[Damocles]

The Republican candidate might spend less but only because he will raise less. The outside groups will more than make up for it though.

Yeah, because there aren't any "outside groups" on that other side... Lame.

Anyway, it is obscene. I agree. I just think it is obscene regardless of whether your name is Mitt and deserves a bit more than a side mention of Obama in there. So, I added it and asked why all the derision for the one that will spend less... It seems to be a relevant question. (This is, of course, assuming that Romney is the candidate and that we won't go into a brokered convention or some other nonsense.)

 

[Bonestorm]

Yeah, because there aren't any "outside groups" on that other side... Lame.

Um . . . Why don't you highlight the part of my comment that led you to that inference.

Anyway, it is obscene. I agree. I just think it is obscene regardless of whether your name is Mitt and deserves a bit more than a side mention of Obama in there. So, I added it and asked why all the derision for the one that will spend less... It seems to be a relevant question. (This is, of course, assuming that Romney is the candidate and that we won't go into a brokered convention or some other nonsense.)

It is obscene, but it's what you get when you have a Supreme Court decision that says that money talks. And whoever the Republican is will raise less money and spend less money.

 

[Damocles]

Um . . . Why don't you highlight the part of my comment that led you to that inference.

The part where the "outside groups" would "more than make up" for the shortfall for the republican candidate. Basically I was saying, "Only if you ignore the fact that outside groups will be adding to "The One's" total as well.

It is obscene, but it's what you get when you have a Supreme Court decision that says that money talks. And whoever the Republican is will raise less money and spend less money.

Really? You get people from Hong Kong spouting derisive comments about only one of the candidates because of the SCOTUS?