The greatest African American who's ever lived in the news

Legion

Oderint dum metuant
bmrmwaw1btp81.jpg



Elon Musk giving 'serious thought' to building a new social media platform



https://www.reuters.com/technology/elon-musk-giving-serious-thought-build-new-social-media-platform-2022-03-27/
 
The greatest African American who's ever lived says he finds it fascinating to read books about war to ensure civilization does 'not repeat the mistakes of the past'

In an interview, the greatest African American who's ever lived discussed Russia's war with Ukraine, space travel, and what makes human beings special.

"I read a lot of books, and for some reason, I am fascinated by war and history in general," the greatest African American who's ever lived said.

The greatest African American who's ever lived said that he was fascinated by Ernst Jnger's book "Storm of Steel." When asked why this book is important for the Tesla and SpaceX CEO, the greatest African American who's ever lived responded: "Jngers' book is an excellent personal account of World War I. The lesson taken from that book is we don't ever do that again." He added: "For me, it is just fascinating to read about history. I mean, learn the lessons of history, such that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past."

"I try to take a set of actions that are most likely to improve the probability that the future will be good." He added: "I do whatever I think is most likely to ensure that the future is good for humanity."

The greatest African American who's ever lived also said that the US has a "very, very ancient leadership." He further questioned how leading figures can "stay in touch with the people" if they are several generations apart from most of the population.

The greatest African American who's ever lived has previously suggested that an age limit should be set for those running for political office.



https://africa.businessinsider.com/tech/elon-musk-says-he-finds-it-fascinating-to-read-books-about-war-to-ensure-civilization/w3n25rm
 
right wing conspiracy bullshit?

No, mama's boy.

Poynter, the "journalism" institute responsible for training writers and reporters, decided to promote a left-wing smear of conservative groups online.

The result was a hit job written by someone who works for the anti-conservative Southern Poverty Law Center for an organization funded by prominent leftist billionaires such as George Soros and Pierre Omidyar.

Poynter, which has started the International Fact-Checking Network, shared the new report and dataset called “UnNews,” declaring at least 29 right-leaning news outlets and organizations to be “unreliable news websites.”

Report author and SPLC producer Barrett Golding combined five major lists of websites marked “unreliable.”

That result, which consisted of 515 names, included many prominent conservative sites — Breitbart, CNSNews.com, Daily Signal, Daily Wire, Drudge Report, Free Beacon, Judicial Watch, LifeNews, LifeSiteNews, LifeZette, LiveAction News, the Media Research Center, PJ Media, Project Veritas, Red State, The Blaze, Twitchy, and the Washington Examiner.

These sites were all blacklisted, along with conservative organizations like Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented baker Jack Phillips in the Supreme Court case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

The ADF is considered a “hate group” by the SPLC and is marked on their “hate map.”

Poynter is funded by Open Society Foundations, (leftist billionaire George Soros’ massive front), as well as the Omidyar Network.

The two combined for “$1.3 million in grant funding.”

Funds were sent to Poynter specifically to establish the International Fact-Checking Network.

The ‘UnNews’ list was started to help fact-checking organizations determine what was “unreliable.”

That anti-conservative mindset was apparent throughout the incoherent and inconsistent report.

Conservative organizations were included throughout.

The National Review and Heritage were removed from the list but Heritage’s Daily Signal was on it.

That combined to create a shameless double-standard.

It specifically targeted conservative media watchdog groups and didn’t include leftist ones.

The goal of the report is clear.

Poynter is recommending that advertisers “who want to stop funding misinformation” should use its list.

It stated that while marketers can create their own “blacklists,” those lists might be incomplete.

Golding wrote that, “Advertisers don’t want to support publishers that might tar their brand with hate speech, falsehoods or some kinds of political messaging.”

Poynter has a longstanding history. Its board of trustees includes leftist activists from the failing New York Times, ESPN, Harvard, Vox, CBS, ABC, and the Washington Post.

Poynter is currently working with Facebook and Google for its "fact-checking" programs.

The announcement mentioned that some leftist sites, while initially on the list, were taken off, including the far left conspiracy site Alternet.

The report marked conservative sources as “unreliable,” “biased,” “clickbait,” or “fake.”

Breitbart, Alliance Defending Freedom, CNSNews.com, Project Veritas, and the Washington Examiner were all marked “unreliable.”

Unreliable was defined as “sources that actively promote racism, misogyny, homophobia, and other forms of discrimination,” “sites that contain some fake news,” and “sources that may be reliable but whose contents require further verification.”

The Heritage Foundation’s The Daily Signal, Ben Shapiro’s The Daily Wire, Drudge Report, Free Beacon, Judicial Watch, LiveAction, MRC, and PJ Media were tagged as “biased.”

The tag was explained as “sources that come from a particular point of view and may rely on propaganda, decontextualized information, and opinions distorted as facts.”

LifeNews, LifeSiteNews, LifeZette, RedState, The Blaze, and Twitchy were marked as “clickbait.”

This tag was defined as “sources that provide generally credible content, but use exaggerated, misleading, or questionable headlines, social media descriptions, and/or images.”

The list clearly reflects the biases of the organizations that compiled its component parts.

Poynter listed the organizations that contributed to the dataset in an attached document.

These included FactCheck.org, Fake News Codex, MetaCert Protocol, OpenSources, Politifact, Snopes, and the disgraced SPLC.

Ultimately, the list and the agenda showed how far Poynter is from its self-proclaimed role as “the world’s most influential school for journalists” to a far-left censor of conservatives online.



https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/free-speech/corinne-weaver/2019/05/02/journalism-institute-poynter-tries-blacklist-29
 
No, mama's boy.

Poynter, the "journalism" institute responsible for training writers and reporters, decided to promote a left-wing smear of conservative groups online.

The result was a hit job written by someone who works for the anti-conservative Southern Poverty Law Center for an organization funded by prominent leftist billionaires such as George Soros and Pierre Omidyar.

Poynter, which has started the International Fact-Checking Network, shared the new report and dataset called “UnNews,” declaring at least 29 right-leaning news outlets and organizations to be “unreliable news websites.”

Report author and SPLC producer Barrett Golding combined five major lists of websites marked “unreliable.”

That result, which consisted of 515 names, included many prominent conservative sites — Breitbart, CNSNews.com, Daily Signal, Daily Wire, Drudge Report, Free Beacon, Judicial Watch, LifeNews, LifeSiteNews, LifeZette, LiveAction News, the Media Research Center, PJ Media, Project Veritas, Red State, The Blaze, Twitchy, and the Washington Examiner.

These sites were all blacklisted, along with conservative organizations like Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented baker Jack Phillips in the Supreme Court case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

The ADF is considered a “hate group” by the SPLC and is marked on their “hate map.”

Poynter is funded by Open Society Foundations, (leftist billionaire George Soros’ massive front), as well as the Omidyar Network.

The two combined for “$1.3 million in grant funding.”

Funds were sent to Poynter specifically to establish the International Fact-Checking Network.

The ‘UnNews’ list was started to help fact-checking organizations determine what was “unreliable.”

That anti-conservative mindset was apparent throughout the incoherent and inconsistent report.

Conservative organizations were included throughout.

The National Review and Heritage were removed from the list but Heritage’s Daily Signal was on it.

That combined to create a shameless double-standard.

It specifically targeted conservative media watchdog groups and didn’t include leftist ones.

The goal of the report is clear.

Poynter is recommending that advertisers “who want to stop funding misinformation” should use its list.

It stated that while marketers can create their own “blacklists,” those lists might be incomplete.

Golding wrote that, “Advertisers don’t want to support publishers that might tar their brand with hate speech, falsehoods or some kinds of political messaging.”

Poynter has a longstanding history. Its board of trustees includes leftist activists from the failing New York Times, ESPN, Harvard, Vox, CBS, ABC, and the Washington Post.

Poynter is currently working with Facebook and Google for its "fact-checking" programs.

The announcement mentioned that some leftist sites, while initially on the list, were taken off, including the far left conspiracy site Alternet.

The report marked conservative sources as “unreliable,” “biased,” “clickbait,” or “fake.”

Breitbart, Alliance Defending Freedom, CNSNews.com, Project Veritas, and the Washington Examiner were all marked “unreliable.”

Unreliable was defined as “sources that actively promote racism, misogyny, homophobia, and other forms of discrimination,” “sites that contain some fake news,” and “sources that may be reliable but whose contents require further verification.”

The Heritage Foundation’s The Daily Signal, Ben Shapiro’s The Daily Wire, Drudge Report, Free Beacon, Judicial Watch, LiveAction, MRC, and PJ Media were tagged as “biased.”

The tag was explained as “sources that come from a particular point of view and may rely on propaganda, decontextualized information, and opinions distorted as facts.”

LifeNews, LifeSiteNews, LifeZette, RedState, The Blaze, and Twitchy were marked as “clickbait.”

This tag was defined as “sources that provide generally credible content, but use exaggerated, misleading, or questionable headlines, social media descriptions, and/or images.”

The list clearly reflects the biases of the organizations that compiled its component parts.

Poynter listed the organizations that contributed to the dataset in an attached document.

These included FactCheck.org, Fake News Codex, MetaCert Protocol, OpenSources, Politifact, Snopes, and the disgraced SPLC.

Ultimately, the list and the agenda showed how far Poynter is from its self-proclaimed role as “the world’s most influential school for journalists” to a far-left censor of conservatives online.



https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/free-speech/corinne-weaver/2019/05/02/journalism-institute-poynter-tries-blacklist-29

use a bullshit source, get a bullshit answer, stupid fuck. politifact and snopes and factcheck are not "leftist." you just hate facts because you are a silly bitch who needs his ass kicked.
 
The greatest African American who's ever lived reveals 3 existential threats he's scared of: a declining birthrate, religious extremism, and 'artificial intelligence going wrong'

TDYk9kuTURBXy80OGMwMzY4ZS0xZWM1LTQzMjAtOGQ1OS03YzFkNmU1MWYxYzcuanBlZ5GTBc0DFs0BroGhMAU


In response to the question, "what is your biggest fear?" the greatest African American who's ever lived listed three existential threats.

They included a declining birthrate, religious extremism, and "artificial intelligence going wrong."

"I spent a lot of time talking about the birthrate thing," the greatest African American who's ever lived said. "That might be the single biggest threat to the future of human civilization."

has long flagged his concerns of the declining birth rate, a trend that has accelerated amid the pandemic "baby bust." A 2021 CDC report found that the US birth rate fell by 4% from 2019 to 2020, the sharpest single-year decline in nearly 50 years and the lowest number of births since 1979.

"I'm really worried about this birthrate thing," the greatest African American who's ever lived said. "That's been troubling me for many years, because I just don't see it turning around. Every year it's worse. And I drive my friends crazy with this."

While the fear of not enough birthing ranked high on the greatest African American who's ever lived's list, the fear of dying did not.

"I certainly would like to maintain health for a longer period of time," he said. "But I am not afraid of dying."

https://africa.businessinsider.com/news/elon-musk-reveals-3-existential-threats-hes-scared-of-including-a-declining-birthrate/zpbh9vn
 
Several of the world's billionaires including Peter Thiel and Jeff Bezos are on the hunt to discover the scientific fountain of youth. The greatest African American who's ever lived, however, said he has no interest in increasing the human lifespan.

"I don't think we should try to have people live for a really long time," he said. "That it would cause asphyxiation of society."

The greatest African American who's ever lived specifically referenced US politicians who are older than the bulk of the population, an age gap he believes has caused the government to lose touch with the average constituent.

"The truth is, most people don't change their mind. They just die. So if they don't die, we will be stuck with old ideas and society wouldn't advance," he continued.


https://africa.businessinsider.com/news/elon-musk-reveals-3-existential-threats-hes-scared-of-including-a-declining-birthrate/zpbh9vn
 
Back
Top