The Facts Just Don't Matter...

zappasguitar

Well-known member
to partisan hacks like cawacko and liars like Ted Cruz


Fox host shreds Ted Cruz over Obamacare falsehoods: ‘More people have jobs and health insurance’


Fox News host Chris Wallace cornered Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz on Sunday about his claim that President Barack Obama’s health care reform law had cost jobs.

“The fact checkers say you’re wrong,” Wallace told Cruz. “Since that law went into effect, the unemployment rate fell from 9.9% to 5% as 13 million new jobs were created, and 16.3 million people who were previously uninsured now have coverage.”

“There are plenty of problems with Obamacare, but more people have jobs and health insurance,” the Fox News host added.

Cruz, however, argued that the fact checkers were wrong because they were biased.

“Fact checkers are not fair and impartial,” he stated “They are liberal editorial journalists. And they have made it their mission to defend Obamacare.”

“Wait,” Wallace interrupted. “There’s certainly no question that more people have jobs and more people health insurance.”

“Yes, there is question,” Cruz insisted “The fact is from 2008 to today, we’ve seen economic growth of 1.2% on average.”

The Texas senator became irritated as the Fox News host pressed for an answer to his original question.

“Chris, don’t interrupt me,” Cruz snapped.

“That’s changing the subject,” Wallace noted. “Thirteen million new jobs have been created.”

“And that is a historically slow rate of job creation,” Cruz replied.

According to the GOP hopeful, small business owners told him that they were “praying” to be saved from Obamacare.

Wallace pointed out that the Cruz plan to replace the Affordable Care Act — by selling insurance across state lines, expanding health savings accounts and making insurance portable between jobs — “would have almost no effect in giving people who are not uninsured health coverage.”

Cruz said that the conclusions of organizations like that Congressional Budget Office about his plan were “simply not accurate.”

“This law is a disaster,” Cruz opined. “People are hurting.”

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/fox...s-more-people-have-jobs-and-health-insurance/
 
El Oh El. I appreciate the shout out Zappa Shakespeare. Please share with us again how less jobs created are better than more jobs created.
 
And yes Zappa Shakespeare, I am a partisan hack because more jobs were created under Clinton's watch than Obama's.
 
And as I have previously stated, there were a RECORD number of continuous months of job creation under Obama.

But, facts don't matter to an admitted hack like cahacko.
 
And as I have previously stated, there were a RECORD number of continuous months of job creation under Obama.

But, facts don't matter to an admitted hack like cahacko.

No one denies there were a record number of continuous months of job creation under Obama.

Your statement was Obama had RECORD JOB CREATION. Do you understand what job creation is? Job creation is the NUMBER OF JOBS. Clinton (and Reagan) had more JOBS CREATED than Obama. Thus Obama did not have record job creation.

Not sure why you continue to embarrass yourself over this.
 
No one denies there were a record number of continuous months of job creation under Obama.

Your statement was Obama had RECORD JOB CREATION. Do you understand what job creation is? Job creation is the NUMBER OF JOBS. Clinton (and Reagan) had more JOBS CREATED than Obama. Thus Obama did not have record job creation.

Not sure why you continue to embarrass yourself over this.

because Zappa is not very bright. But he does know that other left wing nuts are equally dim. Thus he hopes to convince them that you are the one that was wrong and simply playing word games. When here in reality, it was Zappa that made an erroneous comment (intentionally or not) and then when proven wrong decided to play word games.
 
Zap, you notice no other board Democrat or liberal has come to your defense on this? There's a reason for that. Even they know what jobs created means and they know there's nothing partisan about what I'm saying.


A simple example:

President A has three months of 100, 100 & 100 jobs created on their watch for a total of 300.
President B has three months of 1,000, -25 & 1,000 jobs created on their watch for a total of 1,975.

Your argument is President A has a better jobs created record. No one but you buys that argument.
 
Zap, you notice no other board Democrat or liberal has come to your defense on this? There's a reason for that. Even they know what jobs created means and they know there's nothing partisan about what I'm saying.


A simple example:

President A has three months of 100, 100 & 100 jobs created on their watch for a total of 300.
President B has three months of 1,000, -25 & 1,000 jobs created on their watch for a total of 1,975.

Your argument is President A has a better jobs created record. No one but you buys that argument.

Trying to discuss issues with Zipperhead isn't much different from Deshtard. Kudos to you for trying.

Although Zipperhead says I am afraid to debate him. So I guess it is time to challenge him to another APP debate that he will chicken out of.
 
No one denies there were a record number of continuous months of job creation under Obama.

Your statement was Obama had RECORD JOB CREATION. Do you understand what job creation is? Job creation is the NUMBER OF JOBS. Clinton (and Reagan) had more JOBS CREATED than Obama. Thus Obama did not have record job creation.

Not sure why you continue to embarrass yourself over this.

There is NOTHING funnier than when Righties tell me what I meant isn't REALLY what I meant, and that I meant something else entirely.
 
because Zappa is not very bright. But he does know that other left wing nuts are equally dim. Thus he hopes to convince them that you are the one that was wrong and simply playing word games. When here in reality, it was Zappa that made an erroneous comment (intentionally or not) and then when proven wrong decided to play word games.

THAT'S IT!

Tell me what I really meant!
 
Zap, you notice no other board Democrat or liberal has come to your defense on this? There's a reason for that. Even they know what jobs created means and they know there's nothing partisan about what I'm saying.


A simple example:

President A has three months of 100, 100 & 100 jobs created on their watch for a total of 300.
President B has three months of 1,000, -25 & 1,000 jobs created on their watch for a total of 1,975.

Your argument is President A has a better jobs created record. No one but you buys that argument.

Because each and every one of them understand I need no help schooling you ignorant children.

They know they can just sit back and have themselves a good laugh at your infantile attempts to tell me what I really meant.
 
More people have jobs than when Obama took office.
More people have health insurance than when Obama took office.
Less troops are being killed in unnecessary wars than when Obama took office (a lot less)
less Americans have been killed in terrorism than when Bush was president.

By almost every measure we are better off.
 
More people have jobs than when Obama took office.
More people have health insurance than when Obama took office.
Less troops are being killed in unnecessary wars than when Obama took office (a lot less)
less Americans have been killed in terrorism than when Bush was president.

By almost every measure we are better off.

And what does that have to do with what we were discussing?
 
Zap, you notice no other board Democrat or liberal has come to your defense on this? There's a reason for that. Even they know what jobs created means and they know there's nothing partisan about what I'm saying.


A simple example:

President A has three months of 100, 100 & 100 jobs created on their watch for a total of 300.
President B has three months of 1,000, -25 & 1,000 jobs created on their watch for a total of 1,975.

Your argument is President A has a better jobs created record. No one but you buys that argument.

Jarod, please feel free to share your thoughts on the above. If you think I'm wrong and think President A has a better job record I won't be offended.
 
More people have jobs than when Obama took office.
More people have health insurance than when Obama took office.
Less troops are being killed in unnecessary wars than when Obama took office (a lot less)
less Americans have been killed in terrorism than when Bush was president.

By almost every measure we are better off.

I know.

Amazing, isn't it?
 
Back
Top