The Desperate White House and their Lies about the Downgrade. .......Blame who?

[Mr. T]

Adolf Hitler once said “If you tell a big enough lie long enough, eventually people begin to believe it.” Thus is the case with those who believe the “Tea Party” is responsible for the S&P downgrade.

“Tea Party” Downgrade? Economic Terrorists? Holding America “Hostage?” All these well tested catch-phrases demonstrate just how desperate the White House is.

Let me demonstrate. To believe the Tea Party is responsible for the S&P downgrade, you have to believe that were it not for the Tea Party demonstrating against our out of control Government spending, that the S&P, Moody’s and other Credit Rating agencies would never have noticed our Government’s wreckless spending, and failure to plan to ever pay back our debt.

To believe that is patently absurd, if not downright stupid.

If you believe the “Tea Party”, or those American’s who insist the Government live within it’s means (the way each and every one of us has to) are a bunch of economic terrorists, then you yourself would be racking up debt, living far beyond your means, never believing the bills would come due or the creditors would come calling.

Finally, just who’s holding America hostage here? The Democrats controlled the House & Senate beginning in 2007, and the White House in 2008. In those four years beginning in 2007, they’ve failed to pass a federal budget, have wrecklessly spent six-trillion dollars and have failed to plan to pay our debts.

Who’s holding the country hostage? The Democrat Party, led by Barack Hussein Obama.

You want to know who’s to blame for the mess we’re in? Washington DC’s decades of fiscal mis-management. Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrat Controlled Congress.

Obama likes to say that Bush drove our economy into a ditch. Let’s be clear: Obama’s spending six trillion dollars with zero accountability drove not just our economy, but our nation’s credit rating right over a cliff, all the while mashing the gas pedal to the floor.

No President in history has racked up $6,000,000,000,000 (TRILLION) dollars in debt in their entire tenure in office. Obama managed to nearly double our National Debt in two short years, and cost the nation it’s Triple-A credit rating.

Yet another Obama “historic” first.

This country can certainly do without all these Obama “firsts” can’t we?


Source

 

[SmarterthanYou]

the liberal proles will believe anything from their masters

 

[apple0154]

“Tea Party” Downgrade? Economic Terrorists? Holding America “Hostage?” All these well tested catch-phrases demonstrate just how desperate the White House is.

Let me demonstrate. To believe the Tea Party is responsible for the S&P downgrade, you have to believe that were it not for the Tea Party demonstrating against our out of control Government spending, that the S&P, Moody’s and other Credit Rating agencies would never have noticed our Government’s wreckless spending, and failure to plan to ever pay back our debt.

To believe that is patently absurd, if not downright stupid.

If you believe the “Tea Party”, or those American’s who insist the Government live within it’s means (the way each and every one of us has to) are a bunch of economic terrorists, then you yourself would be racking up debt, living far beyond your means, never believing the bills would come due or the creditors would come calling.

Finally, just who’s holding America hostage here? The Democrats controlled the House & Senate beginning in 2007, and the White House in 2008. In those four years beginning in 2007, they’ve failed to pass a federal budget, have wrecklessly spent six-trillion dollars and have failed to plan to pay our debts.

Who’s holding the country hostage? The Democrat Party, led by Barack Hussein Obama.

You want to know who’s to blame for the mess we’re in? Washington DC’s decades of fiscal mis-management. Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrat Controlled Congress.

Obama likes to say that Bush drove our economy into a ditch. Let’s be clear: Obama’s spending six trillion dollars with zero accountability drove not just our economy, but our nation’s credit rating right over a cliff, all the while mashing the gas pedal to the floor.

No President in history has racked up $6,000,000,000,000 (TRILLION) dollars in debt in their entire tenure in office. Obama managed to nearly double our National Debt in two short years, and cost the nation it’s Triple-A credit rating.

Yet another Obama “historic” first.

This country can certainly do without all these Obama “firsts” can’t we?


Source

Folks keep forgetting Obama inherited the mess from Bush. It was the middle of the bailout when he entered office.

Perhaps an analogy would be beneficial. Let's say Bill Smith marries Jane Doe. Jane is a recent divorcee. When she divorced the settlement involved her being libel for half the debts from her marriage. When she marries Bill she brings the debts into that marriage as she is still responsible for them.

Now, Bill has a choice. He can either help pay those bills or let Jane default which will affect his credit rating as he's her husband. In other words he has little choice but to assume part of the debt if he expects his marriage to work. If his home mortgage is coming up for renewal he knows Jane's bills better be paid on time. If he applies for a job and it's discovered his wife has declared bankruptcy chances are he won't get the job. The bottom line being Joe is between a rock and a hard place.

Obama is Joe and the government/Presidency is Jane. Neither Joe nor Obama is responsible for the debt. It came with the "position". Just as Joe doesn't want to end up sleeping on the couch Obama doesn't want to end up sleeping on the proverbial "society's" couch.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

we Tea-rorist proles will believe anything from our masters

Fixed that for ya.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Folks keep forgetting Obama inherited the mess from Bush. It was the middle of the bailout when he entered office.

Perhaps an analogy would be beneficial. Let's say Bill Smith marries Jane Doe. Jane is a recent divorcee. When she divorced the settlement involved her being libel for half the debts from her marriage. When she marries Bill she brings the debts into that marriage as she is still responsible for them.

Now, Bill has a choice. He can either help pay those bills or let Jane default which will affect his credit rating as he's her husband. In other words he has little choice but to assume part of the debt if he expects his marriage to work. If his home mortgage is coming up for renewal he knows Jane's bills better be paid on time. If he applies for a job and it's discovered his wife has declared bankruptcy chances are he won't get the job. The bottom line being Joe is between a rock and a hard place.

Obama is Joe and the government/Presidency is Jane. Neither Joe nor Obama is responsible for the debt. It came with the "position". Just as Joe doesn't want to end up sleeping on the couch Obama doesn't want to end up sleeping on the proverbial "society's" couch.

so bill smith should take out even more debt? what is another approximately 5 trillion dollars among friends....