The Daily injustice report vol. 7

* A Lake Wales Florida police officer who was just given a second chance at keeping his law enforcement certification after he bit a 15-year-old’s nose at a football game is already facing another investigation into unspecified misconduct allegations… yes, you read that right, he bit a kid’s nose.

* A New Orleans Louisiana police officer who is one of the subjects of the Danziger Bridge shooting and cover-up investigation has resigned and it’s rumored that he’s going to enter a plea deal soon as he’s been in plea talks with federal prosecutors over his role as one of the shooters and in the subsequent cover-up. If he pleads he’ll be the fifth cop to do so in this case.
how many others will end up being part of this? I'll have to dig a little to see if any of the 'shooters' have actually plead guilty to any homicide charges.

* Three Columbia South Carolina police officers have refused to testify against a lawyer that they arrested out of fear of incriminating themselves. The lawyer was charged with resisting arrest but has been nolle prossed due because the report filed by the cops was contradicted by video that showed they lied about what happened that night outside a bar in October last year. The police chief there promised an investigation but that never happened, so now the state is investigating, supposedly.
no investigation of outright lying? are we shocked? i'm not. lets see what the state actually does.

* A Vivian Louisiana police officer has been charged with aggravated assault for threatening a man with his gun while he was off duty after an argument the two had over traffic tickets the officer issued to the man’s relatives. The officer left after the argument and then came back with a gun and threatened him.
A misdemeanor charge of aggravated assault. I'm sure you or I would be given the same consideration if we'd threatened an off duty officer with a gun, right?

* An Apopka Florida police officer was sentenced to probation & anger management class after she pleaded no contest for shooting at her husband during a domestic incident.
just so we're clear, she SHOT at her husband during a domestic incident, then disobeyed an order of protection to stay away from him, and all she's getting is probation and anger management counseling.

* Warren Ohio has settled an excessive force suit for $85,000 to a woman who’s head was left in stitches after she was beaten by an officer who made national news for a 2007 incident where he repeatedly tasered a woman on video.
how many more citizens should this pig get to abuse before he's finally fired and arrested?

* A Louisville Kentucky police officer who wrongfully arrested dozens of juveniles is still the subject of an internal investigation after the prosecutor there refused to pursue a case against her. It’s alleged that she intentionally falsely charged kids just to clear her cases.
the departments investigation is still ongoing, but with union protectionism as strong as it is, I doubt she'll see any kind of punishment.

* A Manchester New Hampshire police officer was found guilty of a misdemeanor simple assault charge for punching a man at a bar for allegedly touching his fiance’s butt. The jury deadlocked on a more serious felony assault charge though.
This is one of those cases that should anger everyone. This 'officer' was acquitted of the felony charge because the victim refused to testify. The refusal to testify was based upon the 'pending' felony sexual assault charges that the LEO buddies were ready to file if he did testify.

* A Harrison County Mississippi deputy was arrested on extortion and rendering criminal assistance charges as part of an ongoing corruption investigation against him.
alone or with partners?

* A Schenectady New York police officer was able to retire a day before she was found guilty of official misconduct and drug charges for illegally obtaining prescription medication.
another pension saved. that was close.

* The Seattle Washington police department is now investigating claims that some of their police officers may have been exerting influence on a local TV station to keep it from reporting on police misconduct issues. The claims stem from the videotaped incident between an innocent man and police where the man was kicked and stomped on but the station refused to air the video until a day after a rival station aired it three weeks after that first station got a copy of it… and allegedly erased it from their system so it wouldn’t be seen. For those who say there is media bias out there that keeps misconduct secret, you should be watching this one.follow the money trail. see where it leads.

* From Radley Balko, the state law in Illinois makes recording on-duty police officers a Class I felony, which is the same as sexual assault, punishable by 4-15 years in prison. Massachusetts has a similar law banning the recording of public officials and while Illinois hasn’t successfully prosecuted anyone with their law, not for a lack of trying, Massachusetts has.nothing to fear, nothing to hide, right? what are they afraid of? Actually, this law is the result of the city of chicago having to pay out over 3 million to an individual because one of their 'only ones' lied on the report about the resisting arrest charge. When video and audio later surfaced, state legislators in chicago moved quickly to close that freedom 'loophole'. Of course, law enforcement and government agents are exempt from that law.

* An FBI agent in Tennessee was charged with nineteen counts that include bank fraud for lying about his job to get $1.5mil in mortgages and then lying again in his subsequent bankruptcy filing.
just remember, that it is against the law for YOU to lie to a federal agent.

* A Dumfries Virginia police officer received a suspended sentence in exchange for his guilty plea for stealing police firing range targets to sell for personal profit.
This doesn't sound like a very big deal, but he wasn't stealing from the department, he was stealing from the taxpayers.

* A Gainesville Florida police officer is on paid leave while that officer is the subject of an unspecified criminal investigation. Police officials claim state law prohibits release of details in that case.
in other words, you the citizen are not allowed to know what your betters are doing.

* And lastly, an Emmaus Pennsylvania police officer was suspended while he’s under investigation for an unspecified alcohol-related incident, no other details are being released.
again, YOU don't need to know. your 'state' will shield and protect you from all the badness in the world


lastly, there's an unofficial report going around about the raid in detroit where a 7 year old girl was murdered by a police officer during a 'high risk' raid to arrest a man suspected of murder. He was reportedly walking along the street just an hour before this raid happened. If this turns out to be true, and this individual was careless enough to walk around wherever he wanted, why was this high risk raid necessary? TV show maybe?

stay safe this weekend people.
 
a new update to a story a few years old.

The 9th Circuit upheld a $3.7 million verdict against Oakland, Calif., and two of its officers who were accused of planting an assault rifle on a parolee's property.

Officers John Parkinson and Marcus Midyett appealed the ruling in favor of Torry Smith and Patricia Gray, claiming the court applied an incorrect "subjective intent" test when reaching its verdict.

But because it's the first time the officers are making that claim in court, the circuit dismissed the appeal.

In November 2007, a jury found that the officers violated the civil rights of Smith and his then-girlfriend, Gray, by cooking up a case against him to justify his 2004 arrest.
Smith said the officers entered his East Oakland home while he was in bed and questioned him about a drug dealer. Smith was arrested and booked on a charge of possessing a semiautomatic weapon that police say was found in his yard.
Prosecutors dropped the gun charges, but Smith was kept in jail for nearly five months before he was cleared in January 2005.

Smith and Gray sued and won.

The officers have denied any wrongdoing.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/05/20/27457.htm

So, a jury of 12 people determined that the officers violated the civil rights of two citizens, framed them for a crime they didn't commit, unlawfully arrested them, and kept one of them in jail for 5 months before he was finally cleared of the charges. Then a district court upheld their conviction on their appeal, and so did the circuit......but these officers deny any wrongdoing.

that 'only one' victim mentality. Don't you sheeple realize that THEY ARE THE LAW!!!!!!!!
 
* A Lake Wales Florida police officer who was just given a second chance at keeping his law enforcement certification after he bit a 15-year-old’s nose at a football game is already facing another investigation into unspecified misconduct allegations… yes, you read that right, he bit a kid’s nose.

* A New Orleans Louisiana police officer who is one of the subjects of the Danziger Bridge shooting and cover-up investigation has resigned and it’s rumored that he’s going to enter a plea deal soon as he’s been in plea talks with federal prosecutors over his role as one of the shooters and in the subsequent cover-up. If he pleads he’ll be the fifth cop to do so in this case.
how many others will end up being part of this? I'll have to dig a little to see if any of the 'shooters' have actually plead guilty to any homicide charges.

* Three Columbia South Carolina police officers have refused to testify against a lawyer that they arrested out of fear of incriminating themselves. The lawyer was charged with resisting arrest but has been nolle prossed due because the report filed by the cops was contradicted by video that showed they lied about what happened that night outside a bar in October last year. The police chief there promised an investigation but that never happened, so now the state is investigating, supposedly.
no investigation of outright lying? are we shocked? i'm not. lets see what the state actually does.

* A Vivian Louisiana police officer has been charged with aggravated assault for threatening a man with his gun while he was off duty after an argument the two had over traffic tickets the officer issued to the man’s relatives. The officer left after the argument and then came back with a gun and threatened him.
A misdemeanor charge of aggravated assault. I'm sure you or I would be given the same consideration if we'd threatened an off duty officer with a gun, right?

* An Apopka Florida police officer was sentenced to probation & anger management class after she pleaded no contest for shooting at her husband during a domestic incident.
just so we're clear, she SHOT at her husband during a domestic incident, then disobeyed an order of protection to stay away from him, and all she's getting is probation and anger management counseling.

* Warren Ohio has settled an excessive force suit for $85,000 to a woman who’s head was left in stitches after she was beaten by an officer who made national news for a 2007 incident where he repeatedly tasered a woman on video.
how many more citizens should this pig get to abuse before he's finally fired and arrested?

* A Louisville Kentucky police officer who wrongfully arrested dozens of juveniles is still the subject of an internal investigation after the prosecutor there refused to pursue a case against her. It’s alleged that she intentionally falsely charged kids just to clear her cases.
the departments investigation is still ongoing, but with union protectionism as strong as it is, I doubt she'll see any kind of punishment.

* A Manchester New Hampshire police officer was found guilty of a misdemeanor simple assault charge for punching a man at a bar for allegedly touching his fiance’s butt. The jury deadlocked on a more serious felony assault charge though.
This is one of those cases that should anger everyone. This 'officer' was acquitted of the felony charge because the victim refused to testify. The refusal to testify was based upon the 'pending' felony sexual assault charges that the LEO buddies were ready to file if he did testify.

* A Harrison County Mississippi deputy was arrested on extortion and rendering criminal assistance charges as part of an ongoing corruption investigation against him.
alone or with partners?

* A Schenectady New York police officer was able to retire a day before she was found guilty of official misconduct and drug charges for illegally obtaining prescription medication.
another pension saved. that was close.

* The Seattle Washington police department is now investigating claims that some of their police officers may have been exerting influence on a local TV station to keep it from reporting on police misconduct issues. The claims stem from the videotaped incident between an innocent man and police where the man was kicked and stomped on but the station refused to air the video until a day after a rival station aired it three weeks after that first station got a copy of it… and allegedly erased it from their system so it wouldn’t be seen. For those who say there is media bias out there that keeps misconduct secret, you should be watching this one.follow the money trail. see where it leads.

* From Radley Balko, the state law in Illinois makes recording on-duty police officers a Class I felony, which is the same as sexual assault, punishable by 4-15 years in prison. Massachusetts has a similar law banning the recording of public officials and while Illinois hasn’t successfully prosecuted anyone with their law, not for a lack of trying, Massachusetts has.nothing to fear, nothing to hide, right? what are they afraid of? Actually, this law is the result of the city of chicago having to pay out over 3 million to an individual because one of their 'only ones' lied on the report about the resisting arrest charge. When video and audio later surfaced, state legislators in chicago moved quickly to close that freedom 'loophole'. Of course, law enforcement and government agents are exempt from that law.

* An FBI agent in Tennessee was charged with nineteen counts that include bank fraud for lying about his job to get $1.5mil in mortgages and then lying again in his subsequent bankruptcy filing.
just remember, that it is against the law for YOU to lie to a federal agent.

* A Dumfries Virginia police officer received a suspended sentence in exchange for his guilty plea for stealing police firing range targets to sell for personal profit.
This doesn't sound like a very big deal, but he wasn't stealing from the department, he was stealing from the taxpayers.

* A Gainesville Florida police officer is on paid leave while that officer is the subject of an unspecified criminal investigation. Police officials claim state law prohibits release of details in that case.
in other words, you the citizen are not allowed to know what your betters are doing.

* And lastly, an Emmaus Pennsylvania police officer was suspended while he’s under investigation for an unspecified alcohol-related incident, no other details are being released.
again, YOU don't need to know. your 'state' will shield and protect you from all the badness in the world


lastly, there's an unofficial report going around about the raid in detroit where a 7 year old girl was murdered by a police officer during a 'high risk' raid to arrest a man suspected of murder. He was reportedly walking along the street just an hour before this raid happened. If this turns out to be true, and this individual was careless enough to walk around wherever he wanted, why was this high risk raid necessary? TV show maybe?

stay safe this weekend people.

Sergeant Hector Ismael Ayala
Montgomery County Police Department, MD
EOW: Sunday, April 4, 2010
Cause of Death: Automobile accident

Deputy Sheriff Chad Pritchard
Overton County Sheriff's Office, TN
EOW: Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Cause of Death: Fall

Constable John W. Brown
Calhoun County Constable's Office - Precin..., TX
EOW: Saturday, April 10, 2010
Cause of Death: Heart attack

Deputy Sheriff Jacob Rene Rayos
Reeves County Sheriff's Department, TX
EOW: Sunday, April 11, 2010
Cause of Death: Automobile accident

Deputy Sheriff Ian Michael Deutch
Nye County Sheriff's Office, NV
EOW: Monday, April 26, 2010
Cause of Death: Gunfire

Deputy Sheriff Kory Dahlvig
Vilas County Sheriff's Department, WI
EOW: Monday, April 26, 2010
Cause of Death: Vehicular assault

Officer Rodney Holder
Abilene Police Department, TX
EOW: Thursday, April 29, 2010
Cause of Death: Motorcycle accident

Police Officer Bryan J. Durman
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Police Depa..., KY
EOW: Thursday, April 29, 2010
Cause of Death: Vehicular assault

Sergeant Franco Aguilar
Sevier County Sheriff's Office, UT
EOW: Thursday, April 29, 2010
Cause of Death: Fall
 
While exposing the excesses of law enforcement is appreciated by many, I have to point out the last two with which I disagree with your conclusions. They individuals are under investigation - that means they have not been found guilty of anything yet. IMO, not knowing is how it should be - for everyone. Until/unless there is a conviction, then as far as I am concerned, the public does NOT have a "right to know". Too many people - and that includes LEOs - have their careers and lives ruined by false allegations which are widely publicized - often convicted in the media and public opinion who do not know the details of the case. The more a case is publicized before due process is complete, the less likely justice will be the end result.
 
While exposing the excesses of law enforcement is appreciated by many, I have to point out the last two with which I disagree with your conclusions. They individuals are under investigation - that means they have not been found guilty of anything yet. IMO, not knowing is how it should be - for everyone. Until/unless there is a conviction, then as far as I am concerned, the public does NOT have a "right to know". Too many people - and that includes LEOs - have their careers and lives ruined by false allegations which are widely publicized - often convicted in the media and public opinion who do not know the details of the case. The more a case is publicized before due process is complete, the less likely justice will be the end result.

on it's face, I agree with you. In reality, however, this is not the case. All too often a civilian is smeared by the media with no fear of any kind of retribution by the media companies who do it. In the case of police officers, though, and it becomes a whole new set of standards, which is the reason why I highlight it.
 
on it's face, I agree with you. In reality, however, this is not the case. All too often a civilian is smeared by the media with no fear of any kind of retribution by the media companies who do it. In the case of police officers, though, and it becomes a whole new set of standards, which is the reason why I highlight it.
Media can only report what they know. If the details are not released, they cannot be reported. OTOH, look how often the media will jump on information that is, shall we say, less that complimentary to law enforcement when outside sources reveal the details.

Yes, law enforcement is, in these case, not forthcoming with any details. That is, IMO, appropriate. It is when they DO reveal the details of cases (charges, circumstances of arrest, etc.) - no matter who is involved - that is inappropriate. In short, there is a double standard at play when details of civilian cases are released but withheld about LEOs. But my guess is it's not the media playing favorites.

But I just wanted to point out that withholding info of an investigation is appropriate, and is still the appropriate action regardless of any double standard. Any correction of the double standard should be in favor of withholding details of an investigation for everyone as opposed to revealing all about everyone. Many cry "right to know" but I disagree. Until/unless there is a conviction, the matter is/should be between law enforcement, the judicial system, and the individual. Publicity just makes it that much more difficult to maintain an impartial investigation and to reach a just conclusion. This is especially true for public officials to include law enforcement officers, and high profile figures. When such are accused, it has been my observation that people WANT them to be guilty regardless of the facts. And that puts pressure on the system to find guilt where there may be none.
 
Media can only report what they know. If the details are not released, they cannot be reported. OTOH, look how often the media will jump on information that is, shall we say, less that complimentary to law enforcement when outside sources reveal the details.

Yes, law enforcement is, in these case, not forthcoming with any details. That is, IMO, appropriate. It is when they DO reveal the details of cases (charges, circumstances of arrest, etc.) - no matter who is involved - that is inappropriate. In short, there is a double standard at play when details of civilian cases are released but withheld about LEOs. But my guess is it's not the media playing favorites.

But I just wanted to point out that withholding info of an investigation is appropriate, and is still the appropriate action regardless of any double standard. Any correction of the double standard should be in favor of withholding details of an investigation for everyone as opposed to revealing all about everyone. Many cry "right to know" but I disagree. Until/unless there is a conviction, the matter is/should be between law enforcement, the judicial system, and the individual. Publicity just makes it that much more difficult to maintain an impartial investigation and to reach a just conclusion. This is especially true for public officials to include law enforcement officers, and high profile figures. When such are accused, it has been my observation that people WANT them to be guilty regardless of the facts. And that puts pressure on the system to find guilt where there may be none.

awww, poor mistreated police officers. I call bullshit on your bullshit.
 
Back
Top