The Charlie Kirk Shuffle: false idol

Taichiliberal

Shaken, not stirred!
Just remember folks, last month our Congress passed (with votes from Democrats and Republicans) a bill that will make Oct. 14 a national "remembrance" day for Charlie Kirk .... the assassinated MAGA/ALT-Right blowhard who made a career trying to intellectually justify racism, sexism and a theocratic government. Remember this when some politico wonk carries on about "American exceptionalism". As the old Chinese curse goes, we are living in interesting times. God help us all. 🫤
 
Why October 14th?

Wasn't he killed on September 10th?

Why not make that day a remembrance day?

Either way, I'm in favor of it.

We sane people can observe the day by being grateful for not having him around running his big fat lying mouth anymore, while the trumper goofballs can make it a big deal and pretended that they give a shit about it for anything other than propaganda.

Win - win. :thup:
 
Why October 14th?

Wasn't he killed on September 10th?

Why not make that day a remembrance day?

Either way, I'm in favor of it.

We sane people can observe the day by being grateful for not having him around running his big fat lying mouth anymore, while the trumper goofballs can make it a big deal and pretended that they give a shit about it for anything other than propaganda.

Win - win. :thup:
It is his birthday... Remembrance Day is November 11th in Commonwealth countries to commemorate the huge losses of WWI, and the losses in other wars. Given equal billing to Kirk is the worst kind of stolen valor I have heard of.
 
Why October 14th?

Wasn't he killed on September 10th?

Why not make that day a remembrance day?

Either way, I'm in favor of it.

We sane people can observe the day by being grateful for not having him around running his big fat lying mouth anymore, while the trumper goofballs can make it a big deal and pretended that they give a shit about it for anything other than propaganda.

Win - win. :thup:
I get what you're saying, but sadly it doesn't work that way .... once you nationalize a symbol/image for generations to come, there will always be those who will revise it's meaning to suit their agenda .... ESPECIALLY if the symbol EXACTLY promotes that agenda. Case in point: confederate statues and naming of military bases after confederate soldiers.
 
Racist is an all purpose slur.....and Kirk disputed the oligarchs at several points.
Ahh, typical Maga/Alt-Right revisionism. For your education per Merriam-Webster:

Racist - 1. having, reflecting, or fostering the belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.

2. of, relating to, or characterized by the systemic oppression of a racial group to the social, economic, and political advantage of another

See post #7 here for examples.
 
What did Kirk say that was racist ?

On race

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024
If you’re a WNBA, pot-smoking, Black lesbian, do you get treated better than a United States marine?

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 8 December 2022
Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023
If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024
If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023
 

On race

Yes if you selectively edit Kirk's speech you can falsely make it appear like he is racist. But if you look at the whole conversation he isn't being racist. He is advocating for a system that looks at merit and not the color of a person's skin. When you look at a person's skin to determine if he does or does not get a job that is racism. Racism is hiring someone who is not as qualified for a job just because they have the right skin color. Now if you want to post his entire conversation instead of a selectively edited snippets we can discuss it.
 
Yes if you selectively edit Kirk's speech you can falsely make it appear like he is racist. But if you look at the whole conversation he isn't being racist. He is advocating for a system that looks at merit and not the color of a person's skin. When you look at a person's skin to determine if he does or does not get a job that is racism. Racism is hiring someone who is not as qualified for a job just because they have the right skin color. Now if you want to post his entire conversation instead of a selectively edited snippets we can discuss it.
Black people are still hired on merit.
 
Yes if you selectively edit Kirk's speech you can falsely make it appear like he is racist. But if you look at the whole conversation he isn't being racist. He is advocating for a system that looks at merit and not the color of a person's skin. When you look at a person's skin to determine if he does or does not get a job that is racism. Racism is hiring someone who is not as qualified for a job just because they have the right skin color. Now if you want to post his entire conversation instead of a selectively edited snippets we can discuss it.
:oops::rolleyes: GMAFB with this revisionist MAGA/Alt-Right propaganda. Tell you what, bunky.....why don't you give us the link to the entire speech and highlight the points your stating here. Or copy and paste the entire thing. We'll wait.

See, had you actually used your brain beyond the Fox News propaganda, you'd note that EVERYTHING stated here has REFERENCES TO THE ACTUAL MATERIAL THE EXCERPTS COME FROM. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/threads/the-charlie-kirk-shuffle-false-idol.238692/post-6668058
YOU made the claims here, the burden of proof is on YOU. PUT UP OR STFU!
 
Black people are still hired on merit.
Great! But This is what is going on with air traffic controllers

The colleges believe the FAA changes were made based on an agency diversity study that examined the race and gender of CTI graduates. In particular, the study found low numbers of black students in CTI programs and that the FAA's aptitude exam was a racial and gender diversity barrier. Under the change, candidates now take the aptitude exam after completing the biographical questionnaire.

https://www.insidehighered.com/news...s ago the,racial and gender diversity barrier.

And why doesn't United just say were are hiring the most qualified applicants as pilots?

United Sets New Diversity Goal: 50% of Students at New Pilot Training Academy To Be Women and People of Color


Why not simple hire the most qualified person regardless of race or sex?
 
Black people are still hired on merit.
That what these dummy don't fathom beyond their myopic mindsets. To them, any black person in a position of notoriety/prestige has to be due to DEI (use to be affirmative action), and is therefore unqualified. Yet if said black person is some UT like Carson or Turner or Sowell, Kirk Klowns will fawn all over them. They actually believe that people are as gullible and willfully ignorant as them.
 
:oops::rolleyes: GMAFB with this revisionist MAGA/Alt-Right propaganda. Tell you what, bunky.....why don't you give us the link to the entire speech and highlight the points your stating here. Or copy and paste the entire thing. We'll wait.

See, had you actually used your brain beyond the Fox News propaganda, you'd note that EVERYTHING stated here has REFERENCES TO THE ACTUAL MATERIAL THE EXCERPTS COME FROM. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/threads/the-charlie-kirk-shuffle-false-idol.238692/post-6668058
YOU made the claims here, the burden of proof is on YOU. PUT UP OR STFU!
No moron it is YOUR BURDEN to supply the full conversation and not carefully selected snippets of a conversation. I BET you have not watched or read the full transcript of what Charlie said. When you hire someone or don't hire someone because of the color of their skin it is racism. Merit based hiring is the only logical and ethical way to hire.
 
Great! But This is what is going on with air traffic controllers

The colleges believe the FAA changes were made based on an agency diversity study that examined the race and gender of CTI graduates. In particular, the study found low numbers of black students in CTI programs and that the FAA's aptitude exam was a racial and gender diversity barrier. Under the change, candidates now take the aptitude exam after completing the biographical questionnaire.

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/09/23/collegiate-air-traffic-controller-programs-struggle-stay-relevant-after-faa-hiring#:~:text=Almost two years ago the,racial and gender diversity barrier.

And why doesn't United just say were are hiring the most qualified applicants as pilots?

United Sets New Diversity Goal: 50% of Students at New Pilot Training Academy To Be Women and People of Color


Why not simple hire the most qualified person regardless of race or sex?
It's called an adjustment to the decades of congenital bias among folk in the airline industry with your mindset.

PLEASE POST WHERE IT STATES IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS THAT STANDARDS WILL BE LOWERED FOR NON-WHITE MALE STUDENTS. We'll wait.

In the meantime, here's something for you to ignore or try to hack up to support your bigotry: www.onemileatatime.com/insights/airline-pilots-dei/
 
Then why does United have a diversity goal instead of a merit goal.
DIVERSITY DOES NOT SACRIFICE COMPETANCY. If you can prove otherwise, please do. The test for all still has to be passed.

 
Back
Top