the biggest stain of inhumanity

Southern Man said:
Getting back to the OP, or at least the thread title, the biggest stain is the Democrat Party. It's like a big ol' Hershey stripe down the drawers of an obese frat boy after a week-long binge.
Click to expand...

If there's one thing Republicans are good at it's projection and accidentally describing themselves perfectly while trying to describe the opposition. This post is a case in point.

Watching pundits on Fox News talk about bias in the media is another one.
 
ib1yysguy said:
If there's one thing Republicans are good at it's projection and accidentally describing themselves perfectly while trying to describe the opposition. This post is a case in point.

Watching pundits on Fox News talk about bias in the media is another one.
Click to expand...
Once again you've confirmed yourself to be nothing more than a shit poster.
 
Southern Man said:
Wow hell of a come back.
Click to expand...

Honest debate requires you to address one's actual position. It's been a long time since I've seen any Republicans on this site do anything but construct straw men about socialism. When you've got something to argue with that won't make you look like the dimwitted southerner you are, let me know.
 
ib1yysguy said:
Honest debate requires you to address one's actual position. It's been a long time since I've seen any Republicans on this site do anything but construct straw men about socialism. When you've got something to argue with that won't make you look like the dimwitted southerner you are, let me know.
Click to expand...
So you admit you want the US to be socialist? :)
 
Lowaicue said:
No expert here, sir. But if an adult who has been through your education system still fails to understand the difference between a participle 'dying' and an adjective 'dead' then general communication is likely to be hampered.
And why the uuuuuuuuu? You are the people who need them, not us. And always remeber, there is no humour without u!
Click to expand...
Because I spell correctly without the extemporaneous "u"s, I put them on the bottom so you can add them and feel joyfully "special" as you look at the gorgeous "u"s your nation, and ex-pats, have such a fetish about. It's my way to make you feel more at home.

:D

And remember, there is no "o" in diarrhea....
 
Damocles said:
Because I spell correctly without the extemporaneous "u"s, I put them on the bottom so you can add them and feel joyfully "special" as you look at the gorgeous "u"s your nation, and ex-pats, have such a fetish about. It's my way to make you feel more at home.

:D



And remember, there is no "o" in diarrhea....
Click to expand...

No. You spell according to the whim of one Noah Webster. Hardly an orthographer, in fact barely literate.
We spell according, in the most part, to Dr. Johnson and, of course (cors?) to the post Norman French influence. We do not wish to deny our history. You have none to deny.
There is another factor that might well have a bearing and that is the influence of the English West Country with its rhotic 'r' on American and a general lack of education in the early settlers of America. Hence you find many words reduced to their phonetic base. Surnames are particularly prone to this.
But, having chosen the Webster way .... Ah wunda wy yu doent goe th hol hawg. Ah meen, ja wanna speek inglish er naat?
That'd be mor kolerful, woonit?
 
Lowaicue said:
No. You spell according to the whim of one Noah Webster. Hardly an orthographer, in fact barely literate.
We spell according, in the most part, to Dr. Johnson and, of course (cors?) to the post Norman French influence. We do not wish to deny our history. You have none to deny.
There is another factor that might well have a bearing and that is the influence of the English West Country with its rhotic 'r' on American and a general lack of education in the early settlers of America. Hence you find many words reduced to their phonetic base. Surnames are particularly prone to this.
But, having chosen the Webster way .... Ah wunda wy yu doent goe th hol hawg. Ah meen, ja wanna speek inglish er naat?
That'd be mor kolerful, woonit?
Click to expand...

We just don't like the French is all. While we were colonies, we joyfully faught alongside the Brits in four colonial wars against the French, and were very wary of enlisting their aid during the Revolution. Colonial elders always taught the younger generations that the French were a bunch of heathens, and John Adams even wrote on the French Revolution that "a republic could never work in a nation of 5 million atheists" (he wrote in another article replacing "atheists" with "illiterates" as well).

I have not studied colonial education in the middle and southern colonies, but New England actually had a stong system of education, and ultimately developed Harvard and Yale colleges.
 
Threedee said:
We just don't like the French is all. While we were colonies, we joyfully faught alongside the Brits in four colonial wars against the French, and were very wary of enlisting their aid during the Revolution. Colonial elders always taught the younger generations that the French were a bunch of heathens, and John Adams even wrote on the French Revolution that "a republic could never work in a nation of 5 million atheists" (he wrote in another article replacing "atheists" with "illiterates" as well).

I have not studied colonial education in the middle and southern colonies, but New England actually had a stong system of education, and ultimately developed Harvard and Yale colleges.
Click to expand...

I would imagine that the French, a mainly Roman Catholic nation, and one for whom I have little time, would object strongly to being labelled as heathen by representatives of a nation that brought the world the delights of Scientology, Mormonism, Born again nitwits and Seventh Day Adventists.
 
Lowaicue said:
I would imagine that the French, a mainly Roman Catholic nation, and one for whom I have little time, would object strongly to being labelled as heathen by representatives of a nation that brought the world the delights of Scientology, Mormonism, Born again nitwits and Seventh Day Adventists.
Click to expand...

As a Roman Catholic, I myself have no respect for the French, except that they provided the world with a couple of the coolest saints of all-time (Joan and Bernadette). I personally identify with the Irish when it comes to Catholicism, and not with France, Spain, Portugal, and Central/Eastern Europe...
 
Lowaicue said:
No. You spell according to the whim of one Noah Webster. Hardly an orthographer, in fact barely literate.
We spell according, in the most part, to Dr. Johnson and, of course (cors?) to the post Norman French influence. We do not wish to deny our history. You have none to deny.
There is another factor that might well have a bearing and that is the influence of the English West Country with its rhotic 'r' on American and a general lack of education in the early settlers of America. Hence you find many words reduced to their phonetic base. Surnames are particularly prone to this.
But, having chosen the Webster way .... Ah wunda wy yu doent goe th hol hawg. Ah meen, ja wanna speek inglish er naat?
That'd be mor kolerful, woonit?
Click to expand...
You forgot to add the "u"s at the bottom so you could add and read whatever it is you wrote without feeling left out.

While it may feel to an ex-pat Brit as if the United States had no reason to reject the awesome history of the "u" fetish, they did anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top