The alarmists exposed

Diogenes

Nemo me impune lacessit
Gdg-geMWwAAjwOq


“Ten years to save the planet” from climate change?
 
iu


As Denmark introduces the first tax on cow methane emissions, the methane-reducing feed additive 3-NOP (Bovaer) is approved in the EU and US.

Consumers are exposed to the NOPA metabolite, which causes testicular toxicity in rats.






Just one of the ingredients in Bovaer:


GddYhAMW4AABJBL


According to this document from the FDA website, 3-Nitrooxypropanol, the active ingredient in Bovaer® 10, which is now being used as a feed additive for cows—ostensibly to "reduce methane emissions"—"may damage male fertility and reproductive organs".


Gdc63Z0XcAA9emm
 
Last edited:
Norway’s biggest milk producer launched “climate milk” a little while back, from cows given methane inhibitors to make them fart less.- people didn’t want it, it didn’t sell- so, now they mix chemical-laced milk with normal milk, and don’t mark the containers.

By 2027 ALL Norwegian cows MUST receive these chemicals, by law.

Another disturbing example of alarmist insanity being forced on consumers against their will by the Kooky Klimate Kult.


GdeJc1ZXAAAMutS


 
GdiprfNWAAAX19b


As the alarmist push for "sustainability" is amplified by ideologically-captured science largely funded by lefty fanatics, Bovaer-laced animal products are being foisted onto a mostly-unsuspecting public.

What's Bovaer, anyway? Bovaer is a livestock feed additive that suppresses methane production in the stomachs of ruminant animals, such as cows.

Why does this even matter?

Bovaer's active ingredient, 3-Nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP), inhibits an enzyme in the digestive process blamed by the Kooky Klimate Kultists for bovine methane production. Since many of them also claim that drinking milk is racist, perhaps you can see the issue here.

The presence of 3-NOP residues in animal-derived foods (e.g., milk, meat, butter, and cheese) raises questions about cumulative human exposure.

While this product is touted by the Kooky Klimate Kultists (like billionaire Bill Gates) for its alleged environmental benefits, it introduces a new challenge for human health.

Regulatory bodies blithely assure us that Bovaer’s active ingredient, (3-NOP), is supposedly safe, within specific daily limits. "Safe and effective"? Where've you heard that one before?

However, as more food companies are forced to incorporate Bovaer-fed animal products into their products, the cumulative intake, especially by children, could far exceed recommended safe levels.

Each product may independently meet safety standards, but when consumed together throughout the day, the cumulative exposure exceeds safe levels, especially for children.

Consider an average child. Their ADI for 3-NOP is 6 mg per day.

Here’s how quickly they could exceed this limit:

Breakfast: Milk in cereal (0.8 mg) and butter on toast (0.5 mg).
Lunch: A ham sandwich (1.2 mg), a cheese snack (0.8 mg), and yogurt (0.9 mg).​
Snacks: A portion of ice cream (0.6 mg) and a cookie containing dairy (0.4 mg).​
Dinner: A portion of beef lasagne (1.5 mg) with a glass of milk (0.8 mg).​

By these measures, this child has consumed 7.5 mg of 3-NOP, exceeding their safe daily allowance by 25%.


 
1732886780888.png




In October 1985, the EPA published a 61-page report titled, “Potential Impacts of Sea Level Rise on the Beach at Ocean City, Maryland.”

They projected that the global average sea level would rise between 26.2 and 39.3 centimeters (10.3 and 15.5 inches) by the year 2025.

In reality, as of 2023, the measured sea level had only risen by 11.8 centimeters (4.6 inches) since 1985.

The computer model projections were off by more than a factor of two.

Remember this when the Kooky Klimate Kultists try to tell you that "the science is settled".


 
  • National Science Foundation grant (2023)
  • Amount: $249,966
  • Recipient: Space Science Institute

Purpose: Building resilient communities conference; a national symposium that explores the role of public libraries in addressing local climate impacts -the proposed conference will convene library leaders, climate researchers and educators, public health experts, and informal educators to examine the current prevalence of climate related programming in libraries, and how the concept of environmental health can be used by libraries to create locally and culturally relevant, change oriented, and equitable STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) learning experiences. The intention is for these experiences to be designed with (not just for) their communities increasing resilience and the ability to address hyper-local climate impacts. The conference will include 30 public library leaders, experts in environmental impacts due to climate change, public health experts, and experts in STEM education and informal learning. The purpose of the proposed conference is to bring together thought leaders and change makers across the fields of public libraries, informal STEM learning, and climate change science to catalyze action and research around the roles that libraries and community-based organizations can play in responding to environmental and health-related concerns due to climate change. The conference will advance knowledge by documenting current efforts and utilizing the experts participating to make recommendations for future research, action, and planning. Informal education environments, such as libraries, are now seen as an untapped educational resource. While research and evaluation in museum settings has grown substantially, the potential of informal learning in libraries is still being explored. There is a need for research exploring how existing informal learning models can help predict and understand learning outcomes in a library setting. This conference project aims to identify and create recommendations for a research agenda across the area of public libraries, climate, and community involvement. Evaluation for the conference and related deliverables will be rooted in the transformative paradigm, which recognizes the pervasiveness of inequity and injustice in people's daily lives, and views the role of research and evaluation to be one of addressing and alleviating these societal problems. Specific deliverables for this project include: the national conference or symposium, four background reports to set the stage for the conference and to identify current salient issues, webinars for public library staff highlighting project and partner resources as well as the conference results, a webpage to disseminate conference activities and outputs, presentations at regional and national meetings, and the development of evaluation instruments meant to support and iterate on the project work. Project partners include the space science institute's national center for interactive learning, web junction, interactive learning dynamics, and the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. With a focus on centering equity and building climate resilience in poorer communities, this conference targets the public librarians as the primary audience and will further cement the roles of public libraries as equitably accessed community spaces and critical anchor institutions in STEM learning ecosystems, particularly around the critical issues of climate change, public health, and misinformation about scientific processes related to both.


https://usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_2314180_4900/
 
Gdj5nDeX0AAw78W

A chemical called Bovaer is being fed to cows to "combat climate change".

Their milk is used in butter, cheese, yogurt, and milk. It is championed by Bill Gates.

The active ingredient is 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP).

This is what the Food Standards Agency says: "At the 200 mg dose, effects identified included decreased ovary size. At the higher dose levels (300 mg/kg/day in females), the additive has the potential to cause mesenchymal cell hyperplasia and tumors. The additive should be considered corrosive to the eyes, a skin irritant and potentially harmful by inhalation."

Do you want to drink milk with Bovaer in it?
 
The Kooky Klimate Kult's propagandists force their "climate models" to agree with surface temperature data and then announce that their models are correct because they agree with the global surface temperature data.

This is circular reasoning.
 
Back
Top