Tea party members survey

Topspin

Verified User
New Survey Goes Inside Tea Party: Who Are These People?
Sam Stein , April 1, 2010 * 5:53:17 PM (EST)

The individuals who make up the Tea Party movement are largely conservative and get their news from Fox; they're generally old and of moderate to low income; and they're fairly convinced that their taxes are going to rise in the next few years, even though they likely won't.

Those conclusions are part of a new study put together by The Winston Group, a conservative-leaning polling and strategy firm run by the former director of planning for former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. And they provide a telling new window on the political force that has revamped the Republican Party and altered the landscape of the 2010 elections.

In the course of conducting three national surveys of 1,000 registered voters, Winston was able to peg the percentage of the public that identifies itself with the Tea Party at roughly 17 percent. The group pledges that it is independent of any particular party (indeed 28 percent of Tea Party respondents in the Winston survey labeled their affiliation as such). But on pretty much every defining political or demographic issue, the movement lines up with the GOP or conservative alternatives.

Sixty-five percent of Tea Party respondents called themselves "conservative" compared to the 33 percent of all respondents who did the same. Just eight percent of Tea Party respondents said they were "liberal."

Forty-seven percent of Tea Party respondents said that Fox News was either the top or second source of news they turn to, compared with 19 percent of the overall public who said the same thing.

More than 80 percent (81 percent) of Tea Party respondents expressed very little approval of Barack Obama's job as president, which exceeded disapproval levels held even by Republicans (77%) and conservatives (79%).

All these data points suggest that the Tea Party crowd is compromised predominantly of conservatives. And, not surprisingly, the demographics of the movement seemingly align with those who traditionally vote for the conservative candidate as well. Fifty-six percent of Tea Party respondents are male; 22 percent are over the age of 65 (compared with just 14 percent who are between the ages of 18 and 34); and 23 percent fall in the income range of $50,000 and $75,000.

It's the type of group that would likely benefit the most from Democratic governance, with commitments to Social Security, Medicare, and middle-class job creation. But the Tea Party crowd is decidedly sour on the Democratic agenda. Fifty-six percent of Tea Party respondents said they believe cutting spending will create jobs. And while a huge chunk won't see their taxes affected if the Bush tax cuts expire for those making over $250,000, 82 percent think they will, in fact, go up.

These type of surveys, as usual, should be take with a grain of salt as the numbers seem drawn from interviews with roughly 500 Tea Party members (hardly a full sampling of the movement). Still, the results seem reflective of the politics of the movement and illustrate the absurdity of the argument that the Tea Party vote is truly "up-for-grabs."
 
What that poll also found is that the top issues of the Tea Parties is reflected in the top priorities with the general public:

http://winstongroup.net/2010/04/01/behind-the-headlines-whats-driving-the-tea-party-movement/

...According to David Winston, president of The Winston Group,

“Our research shows that Tea Party activists’ top concern – economy and jobs — mirrors the majority of voters in the country.”​

In the February 2010 New Models study, 36% of Tea Party members name the economy and jobs as their top issue with national deficit and spending close behind at 21% — over twice as high as the overall electorate. However, when given the choice in the January survey, Tea Party members favored “reducing unemployment to 5%” over balancing the budget 63-32%, which closely reflects the overall electorate (64-32%).

While Tea Party members prioritize job creation over deficit spending and tax issues, they value economically conservative policies because they view them as a means to reducing unemployment and improving the economy. Over 4 out of 5 Tea Party members (85%) say tax cuts for small business will create more jobs than increased government spending on infrastructure while the overall electorate prefers tax cuts by a more modest 61-31% margin.
 
Obviously, Mr. Stein, who wrote the article is a flaming liberal with comments like, "they're fairly convinced that their taxes are going to rise in the next few years, even though they likely won't.", and "It's the type of group that would likely benefit the most from Democratic governance, with commitments to Social Security, Medicare, and middle-class job creation."

Does he think people are stupid enough not to understand that when taxes raise for ANY group that it eventually doesn't trickle down to the consumers?....and thats EVERYONE.

Social Security is going insolvent and Medicare is being cut by hundreds of millions, and he thinks the people should cheer?

Unemployment is out of control and the clowns running the government don't have a clue about what to do about it...

The government is spending money that doesn't exist and we should all just marvel at the job they are doing?
Thats the kind of idiocy liberals believe...

Tea Party folks... "they're generally old and of moderate to low income".....yeah....and they're called "the greatest generation" for a good reason.
They fought 'socialism' all their lives, like their parents and their grand parents and some think they should just roll over and suddenly embrace it?
Ain't gonna happen.
 
Last edited:
Where was the TEA party when the Bush admin was blowing the lid off of spending and Cheney was saying "deficit spending doesn't matter"?

They're party loyalists, nothing more. And the guy is right - taxes aren't going up anytime soon, unless Obama wasn't around during the elder Bush's admin...
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but then you are showing that they aren't the idiots that the left wants you to believe. Quit ruining their points with facts!

Indeed. So much rancor from the left, one is left to wonder why so many posts on Tea Parties, Sarah Palin, Fox News? I thought all the tinfoil ones were on the Right?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...-the-paranoid-style-of-politics-89615897.html

paranoid style of politics

By: Chris Stirewalt
Political Editor
April 1, 2010


White House senior advisers, from left, Valerie Jarrett; Phil Schiliro, assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs; and David Axelrod, walk towards Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland. (Charles Dharapak/AP)

To read the news, you might assume that there is a militiaman under every rock and that every tea party is a front for the Aryan Nation.

Will Sarah Palin's "targeting" of House Democrats incite assassins? Is "kill the bill" really a call to violence? Are there links between the Republican Party and nine nuts shooting guns outside a southern Michigan doublewide?

It is usually those out of power who are drawn to paranoid conspiracies, but Democrats sound like a pack of John Birchers talking about a shadowy conspiracy that is plotting against them.

Certainly the Right has seen its share of black helicopters since the dawning of the age of Obama.

There are still the fringey few who hope that Barack Obama isn't really the president because he isn't really a citizen. More common is the wild-eyed notion that Obama is trying to fail on purpose in order to precipitate a crisis that will give him even greater power.

But as they said about the Black Sox scandal, you have to be pretty good to play that bad. This administration is making it up as it goes along. Suggesting that presidential advisers Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod have the skills to fail on purpose gives them far too much credit.

The mistakes of the Obama administration stem from good intentions, inexperience, and excessive self-confidence. The president desperately wants to succeed and believes he is doing so.

But it's not surprising that some conservatives would be driven to distraction. Going from a Republican majority and a conservative ascendancy to a Democratic supermajority and the revival of an agenda more liberal than any in modern times has left a lot of heads spinning.

What's unusual is for the party in power to so deeply embrace conspiratorial thinking. Democrats control both houses of Congress and the presidency, which brings in all of the spooky stuff -- the military, the FBI, the CIA.

But you wouldn't know it from listening to the leaders of the party.

Democrats in Congress have tried to link their passage of the president's health care plan with the protection of black equal rights in 1964. By extension, those who resist what they've done are no better than segregationists.

And when Democrats claimed that ugly racial epithets were hurled at members walking into the Capitol or that one member was spit on, establishment media outlets gobbled up the story.

The video from that walk has been pored over like the Zapruder film. There is some spittle flying from the lips of a shouting protester, but no spitting in disdain. And no one has found any evidence to corroborate the claim that the n-word was flying.

But it appeals to Democrats to think that while what they've done is unpopular, it is morally right. Half of the country may be telling them to stop, but it's only because their minds have been poisoned by racism and intolerance....
 
The individuals who make up the Tea Party movement are largely conservative and get their news from Fox; they're generally old...


Wow, somebody actually paid money to do a survey to come to this conclusion?!

Man, some dude obviously just has walking-around money they can throw around on a whim
 
"they're generally old... "

They should have added a few survey questions on how they'd feel about reducing or eliminating Social Security & Medicare to reduce taxes....
 
It's much more pity than hate. I'd be embarressed to go around and say hey the best I could do is a high school diploma. With our shitty high schools, I'm ashamed of those angry white people.
 
and yet, every high school graduate, save watermark, has shown themselves to be way smarter than you. go figure. I guess that's why they call it 'projection'.
 
I hate/pity stupid NASCAR GED simpletons/teaparty/kkk kites.

Probably cause youse gots yur " deploma " ya was tellin me about....
They gots ta give it to ya after 8 years of high school.right Jethro ?
:yermom: :lol:
 
New Survey Goes Inside Tea Party: Who Are These People?
Sam Stein , April 1, 2010 * 5:53:17 PM (EST)

The individuals who make up the Tea Party movement are largely conservative and get their news from Fox; they're generally old and of moderate to low income; and they're fairly convinced that their taxes are going to rise in the next few years, even though they likely won't.

Those conclusions are part of a new study put together by The Winston Group, a conservative-leaning polling and strategy firm run by the former director of planning for former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. And they provide a telling new window on the political force that has revamped the Republican Party and altered the landscape of the 2010 elections.

In the course of conducting three national surveys of 1,000 registered voters, Winston was able to peg the percentage of the public that identifies itself with the Tea Party at roughly 17 percent. The group pledges that it is independent of any particular party (indeed 28 percent of Tea Party respondents in the Winston survey labeled their affiliation as such). But on pretty much every defining political or demographic issue, the movement lines up with the GOP or conservative alternatives.

Sixty-five percent of Tea Party respondents called themselves "conservative" compared to the 33 percent of all respondents who did the same. Just eight percent of Tea Party respondents said they were "liberal."

Forty-seven percent of Tea Party respondents said that Fox News was either the top or second source of news they turn to, compared with 19 percent of the overall public who said the same thing.

More than 80 percent (81 percent) of Tea Party respondents expressed very little approval of Barack Obama's job as president, which exceeded disapproval levels held even by Republicans (77%) and conservatives (79%).

All these data points suggest that the Tea Party crowd is compromised predominantly of conservatives. And, not surprisingly, the demographics of the movement seemingly align with those who traditionally vote for the conservative candidate as well. Fifty-six percent of Tea Party respondents are male; 22 percent are over the age of 65 (compared with just 14 percent who are between the ages of 18 and 34); and 23 percent fall in the income range of $50,000 and $75,000.

It's the type of group that would likely benefit the most from Democratic governance, with commitments to Social Security, Medicare, and middle-class job creation. But the Tea Party crowd is decidedly sour on the Democratic agenda. Fifty-six percent of Tea Party respondents said they believe cutting spending will create jobs. And while a huge chunk won't see their taxes affected if the Bush tax cuts expire for those making over $250,000, 82 percent think they will, in fact, go up.

These type of surveys, as usual, should be take with a grain of salt as the numbers seem drawn from interviews with roughly 500 Tea Party members (hardly a full sampling of the movement). Still, the results seem reflective of the politics of the movement and illustrate the absurdity of the argument that the Tea Party vote is truly "up-for-grabs."

hmm.... let's see... the biggest complaint brought up by the tea party is the lack of fiscal conservatism in DC. Yet this institution had to do a survey to determine the majority of tea party members were conservative??? Wow.
 
Obviously, Mr. Stein, who wrote the article is a flaming liberal with comments like, "they're fairly convinced that their taxes are going to rise in the next few years, even though they likely won't.", and "It's the type of group that would likely benefit the most from Democratic governance, with commitments to Social Security, Medicare, and middle-class job creation."

Does he think people are stupid enough not to understand that when taxes raise for ANY group that it eventually doesn't trickle down to the consumers?....and thats EVERYONE.

Social Security is going insolvent and Medicare is being cut by hundreds of millions, and he thinks the people should cheer?

Unemployment is out of control and the clowns running the government don't have a clue about what to do about it...

The government is spending money that doesn't exist and we should all just marvel at the job they are doing?
Thats the kind of idiocy liberals believe...

Tea Party folks... "they're generally old and of moderate to low income".....yeah....and they're called "the greatest generation" for a good reason.
They fought 'socialism' all their lives, like their parents and their grand parents and some think they should just roll over and suddenly embrace it?
Ain't gonna happen.

Stein is a far-left reporter.
 
Back
Top