SVB Bailout Straw Poll

Should The government Bail Out Silicon Valley Bank?


  • Total voters
    21
IDK, but I suspect that they will, and that it wont matter......this son of a bitch is going down.....HARD.

should they though?

this is your issue, you're a depressive wanker with so sense of agency.

i guess that's from being old and weak and dependant on past fascist systems.

pleave vote.
 
for real?
For real. And I heard a financial guy on Fox that SVB would be a good buy for someone. They have assets but because they had high risk long term investment they were forced to sell bonds at a loss to cover a run on the bank. Or something like that.

 
Last edited:
arz-2u7om7_t3-jpg.1226040
 
'We will not bail out the bank, but we are looking into how to bail out the depositors" we are told....basically semantec games.
 

There’s something very ugly happening right now: VCs & startup execs who stand to lose their deposits at SVB are going *out of their way* to push a narrative that there’ll be a bank run on Monday if SVB depositors aren’t bailed out by the government. They’re yelling fire in the proverbial theater, hoping that everyone runs and knocks down a candle on their way out - actually starting a fire that may not otherwise have existed. They’re skipping the fact that SVB’s situation is unique: a staggering *89%* of its deposits were uninsured (way higher than normal banks). And they didn’t hedge interest rate risk which is a cardinal sin given the portfolio they held. Their real “hedge” was to spend $$ to become popular in the right influential circles of their own depositors, pledging $5 billion in 2022 to “sustainable finance and carbon neutral operations to support a healthier planet.” Maybe that hedge will pay off for their depositors if the government bails them out, but that should rightly trigger an “Occupy Silicon Valley” of historic proportions.
 
Whatever happens now does not change the fact that the experts either did not understand what was going on, or they failed to prevent disaster.

The death of the West continues apace.
 
Whatever happens now does not change the fact that the experts either did not understand what was going on, or they failed to prevent disaster.

The death of the West continues apace.

Look at who walks away with the most money out of this to determine who is the most guilty of fucking over Americans.
 
For real. And I heard a financial guy on Fox that SVB would be a good buy for someone. They have assets but because they had high risk long term investment they were forced to sell bonds at a loss to cover a run on the bank. Or something like that.


I’d love to see that!
 

There’s something very ugly happening right now: VCs & startup execs who stand to lose their deposits at SVB are going *out of their way* to push a narrative that there’ll be a bank run on Monday if SVB depositors aren’t bailed out by the government. They’re yelling fire in the proverbial theater, hoping that everyone runs and knocks down a candle on their way out - actually starting a fire that may not otherwise have existed. They’re skipping the fact that SVB’s situation is unique: a staggering *89%* of its deposits were uninsured (way higher than normal banks). And they didn’t hedge interest rate risk which is a cardinal sin given the portfolio they held. Their real “hedge” was to spend $$ to become popular in the right influential circles of their own depositors, pledging $5 billion in 2022 to “sustainable finance and carbon neutral operations to support a healthier planet.” Maybe that hedge will pay off for their depositors if the government bails them out, but that should rightly trigger an “Occupy Silicon Valley” of historic proportions.

so bankers dont want to get bailed out, its pesky social media doing it. i see.
 
Back
Top