Study finds battered Wall St. tops Obama inaugural donors

RockX

Banned
Study finds battered Wall St. tops Obama inaugural donors



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Wall Street may be bruised and battered, but it still donated more money than any other U.S. industry to President-elect Barack Obama's inaugural festivities on Tuesday, a study has found.

The Centre for Responsive Politics said executives of finance, insurance and real estate companies and their family members gave $7.1 million (4.8 million) to Obama's inaugural committee.

Top donors from the world of high finance included George Soros, Ronald Perelman and David Shaw, the centre said.

Bankers and hedge fund managers will mingle with Hollywood stars and Silicon Valley high-technology titans at the swearing-in ceremony for the 44th president, the parade down Pennsylvania Avenue and the balls and parties that follow.

Special access and tickets are reportedly available to those who contributed $50,000 to the inaugural committee or who helped "bundle" larger sums from multiple individual donors, the centre said.


The committee refused to accept money from corporations, registered lobbyists, unions or political action committees.

Entertainers such as Halle Berry, Samuel Jackson and Sharon Stone donated heavily, as did behind-the-camera moguls including Steven Spielberg, George Lucas and Jeffrey Katzenberg, the centre said, citing data downloaded from the Presidential Inaugural Committee's Web site.

"While Americans are hoping for real change in Washington, many deep-pocketed donors are hoping money still buys them access and influence," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the non-partisan money-in-politics watchdog group.

"If history is any guide, these wealthy individuals, as well as the corporations and industries they represent, may more than recoup their investment in Obama through presidential appointments, favourable legislation and government contracts," Krumholz said.

People with Wall Street ties -- 118 of them -- gave $3.6 million; lawyers gave $2.5 million; and donors from the TV, movie and music businesses gave $1.7 million, the centre said.


The centre's analysis of inauguration donors was posted on its Web site at www.opensecrets.org.

LOL

For those of you keeping track

Wall Street Ties=Jews
Lawyers=Jews
Entertainment=Jews
 
I've been posting this for several days now.

I've also been posting that Wall street was the biggest donors to his campaign.

Any wonder why Obama wants to get the additional 350 billion in his hands before any real congressional oversight is mandated for the use of that money?
 
And rich people will buy infulence with whichever party is in power.
Why do you think Dem donations blazed past Rep ones for the presidential race last year?
Those with the money knew bush had screwed the pooch for the Republicans.
 
Suddenly the influence of money and Wall Street in politics is a good idea .. and after all, Bush did it.

Amazing.

Let's see the hands of everyone here who believe that Wall Streeet is in the habit of giving away large sums of money to people who aren't going to do their bidding?

Larry Summers

Bailout .. without congressional oversight.

Bush tax cuts.

... get a clue
 
Suddenly the influence of money and Wall Street in politics is a good idea .. and after all, Bush did it.

Amazing.

Let's see the hands of everyone here who believe that Wall Streeet is in the habit of giving away large sums of money to people who aren't going to do their bidding?

Larry Summers

Bailout .. without congressional oversight.

Bush tax cuts.

... get a clue

This is pretty funny BAC. At first I was shocked when I originally read Wall St. gave more to Obama than McCain. Considering how poorly the Republicans did while in power I realized its not that surprising. However you are pretty good at calling out those whose beliefs are closer to yours when they complained about something Bush did but think it ok now when Obama does it. I am/was guilty of the same thing and I think the term is partisanship.
 
This is pretty funny BAC. At first I was shocked when I originally read Wall St. gave more to Obama than McCain. Considering how poorly the Republicans did while in power I realized its not that surprising. However you are pretty good at calling out those whose beliefs are closer to yours when they complained about something Bush did but think it ok now when Obama does it. I am/was guilty of the same thing and I think the term is partisanship.

Thank you brother.

I believe the only benchmark we should be looking for is what is in the best interests of America.
 
Yeah and some even believe in what Obama stands for.

People with money are not all evil.

Yes some do believe in Obama and I hope they are right. I do not "believe" in any politicians, they have to prove themselves to me.

With that said I do believe that Obama offers some hope of positive change.
 
Back
Top