Stimulus Spending Will be outsourced

Sammy Jankis

Was it me?
Wow. Just wow. the talking head fascists on CNBC are attacking the bill because of it's Buy AMerica clause. Our taxpayer money will got to stimulate foreign business.

Americans do not deserve to live, apparently.
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&refer=worldwide&sid=a37pHeTuz_HA
Obama Will Review Buy American Provision in Stimulus (Update1)

Email * Print * A A A


By Roger Runningen and Hans Nichols

Jan. 30 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama’s administration will examine a “buy American” requirement in economic stimulus legislation that has raised concern among U.S. trading partners, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said.

The administration “will review that particular provision,” Gibbs said today at his regular briefing. The president’s advisers understand “all of the concerns that have been heard, not only in this room, but in newspapers produced both up north and down south.”

He refused to say whether the administration supported or opposed keeping that part of the legislation intact. Nor did he say what the president would do if the provision remains once the bill clears the House and the Senate.

The issue may cloud Obama’s trip to Canada on Feb. 19, his first journey outside U.S. borders as president. Officials in Canada, the top U.S. trade partner, are criticizing a part of legislation that passed the U.S. House of Representatives Jan. 28 that requires the use of U.S.-made iron and steel in infrastructure projects.

“U.S. protectionism is about to make Canada’s recession a lot worse,” Ralph Goodale, house leader for the opposition Liberal Party, said today in Parliament.

‘Serious Matter’

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said yesterday that he will complain to U.S. officials over the “buy American” measure. “This is obviously a serious matter,” he said.

The provision also is opposed by U.S. companies with significant sales overseas such as General Electric Co. and Caterpillar Inc., which warn it may spark other countries to retaliate by restricting U.S. products.

The Senate is working on its own version of the stimulus legislation.

The U.S. provision is “clearly against trade agreements,” and Canada would be able to file a complaint under either the North American Free Trade Agreement or with the World Trade Organization, said Simon Potter, an international trade lawyer with McCarthy Tetrault in Montreal.

Harper is proposing a C$40 billion ($32.6 billion) plan to boost Canada’s economy, which like the U.S. is being gripped by a recession. Canada ships about three-quarters of its goods to the U.S. and is being squeezed by plunging demand here.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that trade is going to be on an agenda for a bilateral meeting between the United States and Canada,” Gibbs said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Roger Runningen in Washington at rrunningen@bloomberg.netHans Nichols in Washington at Hnichols2@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: January 30, 2009 15:52 EST
 
Are there enough iron and steel producers left in the US, even IF they begin running at full capacity?
 
Are there enough iron and steel producers left in the US, even IF they begin running at full capacity?

Not sure. But there are other items and services on the table im sure. And even if there are not enough steel manufacturers it would be very stimulating indeed to ramp up a couple more.
 
Not sure. But there are other items and services on the table im sure. And even if there are not enough steel manufacturers it would be very stimulating indeed to ramp up a couple more.

It would.

We need to substitute our imports as well. I'm sure we'll be blocking finished junk and continue to rob the poor provinces of their resources in a regional trade deal near you.
 
So much of our business and GDP depend on foreign sources.
So to bail out the "American" businesses....

Why I say a bottom up approach to our problems is much better in the long run than a top down one propping up the businesses.

We are also bailing out foreign finiancial interests.
 
Of fucking course your not sure. As usual you fucking cry before reading to get informed. You fell off your bike and got outsourced, be a man and get the fuck up.
ps learning doesn't end at college. Had you read more you'd have improved your pissant skill enough to keep a job.
MAN UP
 
Of fucking course your not sure. As usual you fucking cry before reading to get informed. You fell off your bike and got outsourced, be a man and get the fuck up.
ps learning doesn't end at college. Had you read more you'd have improved your pissant skill enough to keep a job.
MAN UP


Oh settle down. So I called you out on your gay father-son sex habits. If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.

And the very notion of a STIMULUS bill being spent overseas is quite ludicrous.
 
Having the foreign exclusion means the people using the bailout money will have to spend more to do less in a lot of instances. It is not a net plus for the United States.
 
Having the foreign exclusion means the people using the bailout money will have to spend more to do less in a lot of instances. It is not a net plus for the United States.

Good. More for american worker. What do you mean by "the united states", american workers, or global corporations?
 
Back
Top