Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'

ExpressLane

Verified User
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'


54 min(s) agoPINNED
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'
Witness and attorney Terrence Bradley answers questions during a hearing in the case of the State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump at the Fulton County Courthouse ( Alyssa Pointer-Pool/Getty Images)

Star witness for the defense team Terrence Bradley revealed late in questioning Friday afternoon that he was accused of sexual assault by someone at the law firm at which he was a parnter, along with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

In questioning by state attorney Anna Cross, Bradley admitted that a large reason he left the law firm was because an employee at the firm accused him of sexual assault, though he denied the allegation.

Bradley indirectly admitted that he paid the employee who accused him.

The admission is key because earlier in his testimony Bradley testified that the reason he left the firm was related to Wade's divorce proceedings, and therefore covered by attorney client privilege, because Bradley served as Wade's divorce lawyer for a time.

Judge Scott McAfee said that Bradley's admission re-opens questions about what Bradley refused to answer about what he knew about Wade and Fani Willis' romantic relationship and when he knew. Bradley refused to answer citing attorney client privilege.

"Mr. Bradley previously testified that the reason he left the firm was totally and completely covered by privilege. When asked by the state, he went into a factual scenario that, to my mind, I don't see how it relates to privilege at all. And so now I'm left wondering if Mr. Bradley has been properly interpreting privilege this entire time," the judge said.

McAfee said he would schedule an in-camera hearing with Bradley to determine matters of privilege in the testimony.
Judge Scott McAfee adjourned the hearing after two days of testimony in the allegations that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis had an "improper" affair with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

The judge said he would hold an in-camera meeting with Terrence Bradley to discuss his testimony, some of which that the state argued was attorney client privileged.

Bradley revealed he was accused of sexual assault by an employee of the firm at which he was once partner at with Nathan Wade.

The state attempted to call a woman to the witness stand they said would testify to the allegations of assault - which Bradley denied - but the judge said that testimony was outside the scope of the rules of evidence for the hearing.

The state said the woman's testimony would impeach Bradley's credibility.

Judge McAfee said he would hold a summation hearing of all the evidence presented in the next week or two....

=========================

So the defense witness lied to the court about the reason he left his firm. Then he refused to say what he knew about Wade's Willis' affair. The Judge will find out if Bradley can claim attorney client privilege or not. These people :palm:
 
This isn't the bombshell you think it is.
Bradley's attorney was the one that objected to claim privilege about what Bradley knew about the relationship.

Information that Bradley learned while from Wade while Wade's divorce attorney would be privileged and won't stop being privileged.
The judge is going to hold an in camera hearing to see why Bradley claimed privilege.

Bradley testified the reason he left the firm was privileged as part of the Wade divorce trial. The state lawyers presented evidence that Bradley left the firm because he was accused of sexually assaulting an employee.
This doesn't help Trump or the other defendants at all since he is the witness that supposedly impeaches the testimony of Willis and Wade as to when their relationship started. If Bradley is proven to be a liar then all of his testimony becomes suspect and the judge can ignore it if he wants to. That means that there is zero evidence of Wade and Willis having a relationship prior to Wade being hired.
 
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'


54 min(s) agoPINNED
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'
Witness and attorney Terrence Bradley answers questions during a hearing in the case of the State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump at the Fulton County Courthouse ( Alyssa Pointer-Pool/Getty Images)

Star witness for the defense team Terrence Bradley revealed late in questioning Friday afternoon that he was accused of sexual assault by someone at the law firm at which he was a parnter, along with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

In questioning by state attorney Anna Cross, Bradley admitted that a large reason he left the law firm was because an employee at the firm accused him of sexual assault, though he denied the allegation.

Bradley indirectly admitted that he paid the employee who accused him.

The admission is key because earlier in his testimony Bradley testified that the reason he left the firm was related to Wade's divorce proceedings, and therefore covered by attorney client privilege, because Bradley served as Wade's divorce lawyer for a time.

Judge Scott McAfee said that Bradley's admission re-opens questions about what Bradley refused to answer about what he knew about Wade and Fani Willis' romantic relationship and when he knew. Bradley refused to answer citing attorney client privilege.

"Mr. Bradley previously testified that the reason he left the firm was totally and completely covered by privilege. When asked by the state, he went into a factual scenario that, to my mind, I don't see how it relates to privilege at all. And so now I'm left wondering if Mr. Bradley has been properly interpreting privilege this entire time," the judge said.

McAfee said he would schedule an in-camera hearing with Bradley to determine matters of privilege in the testimony.
Judge Scott McAfee adjourned the hearing after two days of testimony in the allegations that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis had an "improper" affair with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

The judge said he would hold an in-camera meeting with Terrence Bradley to discuss his testimony, some of which that the state argued was attorney client privileged.

Bradley revealed he was accused of sexual assault by an employee of the firm at which he was once partner at with Nathan Wade.

The state attempted to call a woman to the witness stand they said would testify to the allegations of assault - which Bradley denied - but the judge said that testimony was outside the scope of the rules of evidence for the hearing.

The state said the woman's testimony would impeach Bradley's credibility.

Judge McAfee said he would hold a summation hearing of all the evidence presented in the next week or two....

=========================

So the defense witness lied to the court about the reason he left his firm. Then he refused to say what he knew about Wade's Willis' affair. The Judge will find out if Bradley can claim attorney client privilege or not. These people :palm:

It’s also no bombshell since it’s not credible Willis and Wade would have put their careers in jeopardy by perjuring themselves. They would have withdrawn from the case.
 
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'


54 min(s) agoPINNED
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'
Star witness admits to bombshell that leaves judge 'wondering'
Witness and attorney Terrence Bradley answers questions during a hearing in the case of the State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump at the Fulton County Courthouse ( Alyssa Pointer-Pool/Getty Images)

Star witness for the defense team Terrence Bradley revealed late in questioning Friday afternoon that he was accused of sexual assault by someone at the law firm at which he was a parnter, along with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

In questioning by state attorney Anna Cross, Bradley admitted that a large reason he left the law firm was because an employee at the firm accused him of sexual assault, though he denied the allegation.

Bradley indirectly admitted that he paid the employee who accused him.

The admission is key because earlier in his testimony Bradley testified that the reason he left the firm was related to Wade's divorce proceedings, and therefore covered by attorney client privilege, because Bradley served as Wade's divorce lawyer for a time.

Judge Scott McAfee said that Bradley's admission re-opens questions about what Bradley refused to answer about what he knew about Wade and Fani Willis' romantic relationship and when he knew. Bradley refused to answer citing attorney client privilege.

"Mr. Bradley previously testified that the reason he left the firm was totally and completely covered by privilege. When asked by the state, he went into a factual scenario that, to my mind, I don't see how it relates to privilege at all. And so now I'm left wondering if Mr. Bradley has been properly interpreting privilege this entire time," the judge said.

McAfee said he would schedule an in-camera hearing with Bradley to determine matters of privilege in the testimony.
Judge Scott McAfee adjourned the hearing after two days of testimony in the allegations that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis had an "improper" affair with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

The judge said he would hold an in-camera meeting with Terrence Bradley to discuss his testimony, some of which that the state argued was attorney client privileged.

Bradley revealed he was accused of sexual assault by an employee of the firm at which he was once partner at with Nathan Wade.

The state attempted to call a woman to the witness stand they said would testify to the allegations of assault - which Bradley denied - but the judge said that testimony was outside the scope of the rules of evidence for the hearing.

The state said the woman's testimony would impeach Bradley's credibility.

Judge McAfee said he would hold a summation hearing of all the evidence presented in the next week or two....

=========================

So the defense witness lied to the court about the reason he left his firm. Then he refused to say what he knew about Wade's Willis' affair. The Judge will find out if Bradley can claim attorney client privilege or not. These people :palm:

Fox News=Fake News
 
It’s fox reporting


Trash

The problem is that ExpressLane doesn't realize that Trump is the defendant along with the other people charged in GA. This is about impeaching the one person that claimed Willis and Wade had an affair that started earlier than they admitted and showing they had reason to lie.

So the defense witness lied to the court about the reason he left his firm. Then he refused to say what he knew about Wade's Willis' affair. The Judge will find out if Bradley can claim attorney client privilege or not. These people :palm:
The DEFENSE witness is the one lying. Fanni Willis is the prosecutor, not the defense. Roman and Trump are the defendants.
 
It’s also no bombshell since it’s not credible Willis and Wade would have put their careers in jeopardy by perjuring themselves. They would have withdrawn from the case.
Are you saying a lawyer has never perjured themself
. Stop it you are making my sides hurt from laughing. :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:
 
The problem is that ExpressLane doesn't realize that Trump is the defendant along with the other people charged in GA. This is about impeaching the one person that claimed Willis and Wade had an affair that started earlier than they admitted and showing they had reason to lie.


The DEFENSE witness is the one lying. Fanni Willis is the prosecutor, not the defense. Roman and Trump are the defendants.

BUT TRUMP!!!!

:magagrin:
 
Yeah? Trump has a lawyer in the courtroom asking questions of witnesses.

At this point I can only assume your dementia has gotten so bad you don't even know where Trump is going to trial. Do you remember that you had for breakfast this morning?


Cinnamon and raisin English muffins. They were very good. So who is this hearing about Fani or Trump? You seem very confused :)
 
Cinnamon and raisin English muffins. They were very good. So who is this hearing about Fani or Trump? You seem very confused :)

It's brought by Trump and Roman and other defendants. If they hadn't filed a motion, the hearing would have never happened. Since they have no evidence, as the hearing has shown, it is nothing more than a delay tactic.

The hearing is very much about Trump which is why Trump's lawyer is there asking questions of witnesses. If it was not about Trump then no Trump lawyer would be allowed to be asking questions.
 
It's brought by Trump and Roman and other defendants. If they hadn't filed a motion, the hearing would have never happened. Since they have no evidence, as the hearing has shown, it is nothing more than a delay tactic.

The hearing is very much about Trump which is why Trump's lawyer is there asking questions of witnesses. If it was not about Trump then no Trump lawyer would be allowed to be asking questions.

Nope this is about Fat Fanny and her Sex Toy. The judge is going to rule against them not Trump you moron. :rofl2:
 
Back
Top